Skip to content

Prophylactic Laparoscopic Suspension After McCall

Prophylactic Laparoscopic Suspension After McCall - Benefit and Longterm Outcome

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04560543
Acronym
LAPCALL
Enrollment
114
Registered
2020-09-23
Start date
2021-05-15
Completion date
2032-12-31
Last updated
2026-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prolapse Pelvic

Brief summary

There is prove of prolapse prevention in vaginal hysterectomy using the McCall suture. Poor and especially no long-term data exists for a standardized laparoscopic approach, but the few studies could show good anatomic results. The aim is to test the effectiveness of the laparoscopic McCall suture compared to usual vaginal cuff closure in a randomized controlled double-blinded trial.

Detailed description

182 patients will be enrolled in the study. We randomize the patient before surgery and information about the procedure will be transmitted to the theatre in a sealed envelope. The surgeon will open the envelope just before surgery. For randomization we apply a 1:1 allocation (standard vaginal cuff closure VS standard vaginal cuff closure with McCall sutures). The McCall suture is standardized: we apply a purse-string suture including both USL and the peritoneum. Follow-up visits measuring POP-Q are planned after 6 weeks and yearly until 5 years.

Interventions

PROCEDUREStandard cuff closure

Standard laparoscopic barbed suture of the vaginal cuff

PROCEDUREMcCall suture

Laparoscopic suture including the uterosacral ligaments and the peritoneum

Sponsors

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* LSC simple hysterectomy, * Neg. SS test if premenopausal * \>18j, * Consent to participate in the study * Understanding of the German language

Exclusion criteria

* Prolapse as indication for surgery * Known or suspected non-compliance * Additional incontinence procedures * Patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis * Irradiation pre- or postoperative * Pregnancy and lactation. * Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy * Inability to understand the study protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prolapse of the apical compartment. Primary Quantification by the Pelvic organ prolapse Scoring system (POP-Q) Depending on vaginal length, it could vary between +10 and -10cm.5 yearsPrimary Quantification by the Pelvic organ prolapse Scoring system (POP-Q), ranges from -10 (low) to +10 (high), better outcome with higher score endpoint is the prolapse of the apical compartment (point D in the POP-Q score, vaginal dome in relation to the hymen) after 5 years. Point D is a value measured in centimeters. Depending on vaginal length, it could vary between +10 and -10cm. Reference point of all measurements is the hymen.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sexual function5 yearsQuantification by the Female Sexual Function Index, Score 0 - 5, better outcome with higher score

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

CONTACTDiana Höhn, MD
diana.hoehn@insel.ch0316321010
STUDY_DIRECTORMichel D Mueller, Prof.

Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital, Berne

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 20, 2026