Skip to content

Mindful After Cancer: A Mindfulness-based Therapy Intervention for Sexual Health After Cancer

Mindful After Cancer Study: Fostering Positive Body Image, Sexual Health, and Well-being

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04559854
Acronym
MAC
Enrollment
22
Registered
2020-09-23
Start date
2019-07-01
Completion date
2020-10-05
Last updated
2025-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Gynecologic Cancer

Brief summary

The objectives of this study are to: 1) adapt a mindfulness-based therapy program designed to help women manage their sexual and body image concerns after cancer (Mindful After Cancer, MAC) to a videoconference format and 2) assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of the program among breast and gynecologic cancer survivors.

Detailed description

The specific aims are: 1) Assess the feasibility of the MAC program when delivered via videoconference and 2) Assess preliminary effects of the the program.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMindful After Cancer

The intervention includes eight weekly sessions (1.5-2 hours each), plus participant educational materials and audio recorded meditations, and is delivered to women in their homes via group videoconference led by a trained facilitator. Participants are asked to complete activities and mindfulness practice between sessions.

Sponsors

OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Oregon State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of breast or gynecologic cancer at least one year prior to enrollment * Completed primary cancer treatment * English speaking * Have access to a computer, smart phone, or tablet with internet access * Ability to spend 15-30 minutes per day on program activities

Exclusion criteria

\- Stage 0 (carcinoma in situ)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility/ Enrollment in the StudyBaseline (T1)Percentage of participants enrolled of those eligible
Feasibility/ Retention in the Study1 month post-intervention (T2)Number and percentage of participants completing all assessments
Feasibility/ Retention in the Intervention1 month post-intervention (T2)Number and percentage attending at least 6 of 8 sessions
Acceptability of the Intervention1 month post-intervention (T2)Endorsement of 10 items characterizing acceptability of the intervention (e.g., the program met my expectations). Range 10-100. Higher score indicates better acceptability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline Body Appreciation at 1 MonthBaseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)Body Appreciation Scale. 13 items. Range 13-65. Higher score indicates more positive body appreciation.
Change From Baseline Anxiety at 1 MonthBaseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)PROMIS Emotional Distress Anxiety Short Form 6a. 6 items. Range 6-30. Higher score indicates greater anxiety symptoms.
Change From Baseline Depression at 1 MonthBaseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). 20 items. Range 0-60. Higher score indicates greater depressive symptoms
Change From Baseline Interest in Sexual Activity at 1 MonthBaseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction 2.0. 2 items. Range 2-10. Higher score indicates more interest in sexual activity.
Change From Baseline Self-compassion at 1 MonthBaseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)Self-Compassion Scale short form. 12 items. Total score is calculated based on mean of item responses (each item ranges 1-5). Higher mean score indicates greater self-compassion.
Change From Baseline Relationship Quality at 1 MonthBaseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)Dyadic Adjustment Scale short form (DAS-7). Range 0-36. Higher score indicates more positive relationship quality
Change in Facets of Baseline Mindfulness at 1 MonthBaseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-15). 15 items with 5 sub-scales: Observe, Describe; Act with Awareness; Non-Judgement, Non-Reactivity. Sub-scale score range 3-15. Higher score indicates greater mindfulness.
Change From Baseline Satisfaction With Sex Life at 1 MonthBaseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)New Sexual Satisfaction Scale- Short Form (NSSS-S). 12 items. Range 12-60. Higher score indicates more sexual satisfaction.
Change From Baseline Self-efficacy at 1 MonthBaseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)Self-efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease Scale (adapted). 6 items. Range 6-60. Higher score indicates better self-efficacy for managing sexual health after cancer.
Change From Baseline Body Image at 1 MonthBaseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)Body Image Scale. 10 items. Range 0-30. Higher score indicates poorer body image.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Mindful After Cancer
Participants will be asked to attend 8 weekly sessions via videoconference, and to complete home activities and mindfulness practice between sessions. Mindful After Cancer: The intervention includes eight weekly sessions (1.5-2 hours each), plus participant educational materials and audio recorded meditations, and is delivered to women in their homes via group videoconference led by a trained facilitator. Participants are asked to complete activities and mindfulness practice between sessions.
22
Total22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMindful After Cancer
Age at Cancer Diagnosis47.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
Age, Continuous53.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
Cancer Type
Breast
21 Participants
Cancer Type
Ovarian
1 Participants
Current Contraception Use2 Participants
Education
College graduate
20 Participants
Education
Did not graduate from college
2 Participants
Employment Status
Employed
15 Participants
Employment Status
Unemployed
7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Has Biological Child(ren)15 Participants
Health Insurance Coverage
No
0 Participants
Health Insurance Coverage
Yes
22 Participants
Income
< $50,000 annual income
8 Participants
Income
> $50,000 annual income
14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
22 Participants
Relationship status
Not Partnered
7 Participants
Relationship status
Partnered
15 Participants
Self-Reported Cancer Stage
I
12 Participants
Self-Reported Cancer Stage
II
5 Participants
Self-Reported Cancer Stage
III
3 Participants
Self-Reported Cancer Stage
IV
1 Participants
Self-Reported Cancer Stage
Unknown
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
Sexually Active13 Participants
Sexual Orientation
Bisexual
4 Participants
Sexual Orientation
Heterosexual
18 Participants
Time Since Cancer Diagnosis6.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Acceptability of the Intervention

Endorsement of 10 items characterizing acceptability of the intervention (e.g., the program met my expectations). Range 10-100. Higher score indicates better acceptability.

Time frame: 1 month post-intervention (T2)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindful After CancerAcceptability of the Intervention75.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.9
Primary

Feasibility/ Enrollment in the Study

Percentage of participants enrolled of those eligible

Time frame: Baseline (T1)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Mindful After CancerFeasibility/ Enrollment in the Study78.6 Percentage enrolled of eligible
Primary

Feasibility/ Retention in the Intervention

Number and percentage attending at least 6 of 8 sessions

Time frame: 1 month post-intervention (T2)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Mindful After CancerFeasibility/ Retention in the Intervention18 Participants
Primary

Feasibility/ Retention in the Study

Number and percentage of participants completing all assessments

Time frame: 1 month post-intervention (T2)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Mindful After CancerFeasibility/ Retention in the Study22 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline Anxiety at 1 Month

PROMIS Emotional Distress Anxiety Short Form 6a. 6 items. Range 6-30. Higher score indicates greater anxiety symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindful After CancerChange From Baseline Anxiety at 1 MonthT1 Mean, SD15.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Mindful After CancerChange From Baseline Anxiety at 1 MonthT2 Mean, SD12.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline Body Appreciation at 1 Month

Body Appreciation Scale. 13 items. Range 13-65. Higher score indicates more positive body appreciation.

Time frame: Baseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindful After CancerChange From Baseline Body Appreciation at 1 MonthT1 Mean, SD3.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Mindful After CancerChange From Baseline Body Appreciation at 1 MonthT2 Mean, SD3.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline Body Image at 1 Month

Body Image Scale. 10 items. Range 0-30. Higher score indicates poorer body image.

Time frame: Baseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindful After CancerChange From Baseline Body Image at 1 MonthT1 Mean, SD15.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Mindful After CancerChange From Baseline Body Image at 1 MonthT2 Mean, SD13.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline Depression at 1 Month

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). 20 items. Range 0-60. Higher score indicates greater depressive symptoms

Time frame: Baseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindful After CancerChange From Baseline Depression at 1 MonthT1 Mean, SD16.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Mindful After CancerChange From Baseline Depression at 1 MonthT2 Mean, SD13.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline Interest in Sexual Activity at 1 Month

PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction 2.0. 2 items. Range 2-10. Higher score indicates more interest in sexual activity.

Time frame: Baseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindful After CancerChange From Baseline Interest in Sexual Activity at 1 MonthT1 Mean, SD4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Mindful After CancerChange From Baseline Interest in Sexual Activity at 1 MonthT2 Mean, SD5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline Relationship Quality at 1 Month

Dyadic Adjustment Scale short form (DAS-7). Range 0-36. Higher score indicates more positive relationship quality

Time frame: Baseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindful After CancerChange From Baseline Relationship Quality at 1 MonthT1 Mean, SD24.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Mindful After CancerChange From Baseline Relationship Quality at 1 MonthT2 Mean, SD25.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline Satisfaction With Sex Life at 1 Month

New Sexual Satisfaction Scale- Short Form (NSSS-S). 12 items. Range 12-60. Higher score indicates more sexual satisfaction.

Time frame: Baseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindful After CancerChange From Baseline Satisfaction With Sex Life at 1 MonthT1 Mean, SD35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
Mindful After CancerChange From Baseline Satisfaction With Sex Life at 1 MonthT2 Mean, SD37.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline Self-compassion at 1 Month

Self-Compassion Scale short form. 12 items. Total score is calculated based on mean of item responses (each item ranges 1-5). Higher mean score indicates greater self-compassion.

Time frame: Baseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindful After CancerChange From Baseline Self-compassion at 1 MonthT2 Mean, SD2.9 mean score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Mindful After CancerChange From Baseline Self-compassion at 1 MonthT1 Mean, SD3.0 mean score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline Self-efficacy at 1 Month

Self-efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease Scale (adapted). 6 items. Range 6-60. Higher score indicates better self-efficacy for managing sexual health after cancer.

Time frame: Baseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Mindful After CancerChange From Baseline Self-efficacy at 1 Month0.06 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Facets of Baseline Mindfulness at 1 Month

Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-15). 15 items with 5 sub-scales: Observe, Describe; Act with Awareness; Non-Judgement, Non-Reactivity. Sub-scale score range 3-15. Higher score indicates greater mindfulness.

Time frame: Baseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindful After CancerChange in Facets of Baseline Mindfulness at 1 MonthObserve subscale T1 Mean, SD10.8 score on a subscaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Mindful After CancerChange in Facets of Baseline Mindfulness at 1 MonthObserve subscale T2 Mean, SD9.6 score on a subscaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Mindful After CancerChange in Facets of Baseline Mindfulness at 1 MonthActing with Awareness subscale T1 Mean, SD9.3 score on a subscaleStandard Deviation 2
Mindful After CancerChange in Facets of Baseline Mindfulness at 1 MonthActing with Awareness subscale T2 Mean, SD10.8 score on a subscaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Mindful After CancerChange in Facets of Baseline Mindfulness at 1 MonthNon-reactivity subscale T1 Mean, SD9.7 score on a subscaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Mindful After CancerChange in Facets of Baseline Mindfulness at 1 MonthNon-reactivity subscale T2 Mean, SD8.9 score on a subscaleStandard Deviation 1
Mindful After CancerChange in Facets of Baseline Mindfulness at 1 MonthNon-judging subscale T1 Mean, SD10.7 score on a subscaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Mindful After CancerChange in Facets of Baseline Mindfulness at 1 MonthNon-judging subscale T2 Mean, SD8.8 score on a subscaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Mindful After CancerChange in Facets of Baseline Mindfulness at 1 MonthDescribing subscale T1 Mean, SD10.3 score on a subscaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Mindful After CancerChange in Facets of Baseline Mindfulness at 1 MonthDescribing subscale T2 Mean, SD10.0 score on a subscaleStandard Deviation 1.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026