Skip to content

Assessing Mental Health Providers' Clinical Knowledge and Skills Via an Online Training on LGBTQ-affirmative Cognitive-behavioral Therapy

Assessing Mental Health Providers' Clinical Knowledge and Skills Via an Online Training on LGBTQ-affirmative Cognitive-behavioral Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04559698
Enrollment
121
Registered
2020-09-23
Start date
2020-10-01
Completion date
2021-06-26
Last updated
2022-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

LGBTQ

Brief summary

The purpose of the proposed study is to train mental health providers (MHPs) at lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) community centers across the United States in evidence-based, LGBTQ-affirmative cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT).

Detailed description

The purpose of the proposed study is to train mental health providers (MHPs) at LGBTQ community centers across the United States in evidence-based, LGBTQ-affirmative cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the LGBTQ-affirmative CBT training increases LGBTQ and CBT knowledge, clinical skills, and cultural humility among a sample of MHPs from LGBTQ community centers in the U.S. The proposed prospective study will follow a 2-arm waitlist randomized-controlled trial design where one group of MHPs will be randomized to receive the intervention training (i.e., the immediate training group) in LGBTQ-affirmative CBT, and the second group of MHPs will be randomized to a waitlist control group. The proposed mixed-methods study will consist of predominantly quantitative self-report measures, as well as a qualitative self-assessment of participants' LGBTQ-affirmative CBT clinical skills. All study measures will be administered online at three time points-- baseline, 4-months post-baseline, and 8-months post-baseline (changed prior to randomization from 3-months and 6-months, respectively)-- via the secure Yale Qualtrics survey software.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALLGBTQ-affirmative CBT training

Participants will take part in 11-week LGBTQ-affirmative CBT training via Zoom for 1-hour per week.

Sponsors

David R. Kessler, M.D. '55 Fund for LGBTQ Mental Health Research at Yale
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Yale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18+ years old * Fluent in English * Mental health provider (including, but not limited to licensed practicing counselors, licensed clinical social workers, licensed marital and family therapists, clinical/counseling psychologists, pre-doctoral psychology interns, third-year or greater graduate practicum students/externs) * Currently practicing in an LGBTQ community center that is coordinated by CenterLink, the coordinating hub for LGBTQ community centers in the U.S.

Exclusion criteria

* • Individuals unwilling or unable to give informed consent at the time of participation and/or not fitting the eligibility criteria outlined above

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Familiarity With LGBTQ-Affirmative CBT SkillsFour-month Pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Immediate Post-intervention, Four-month Post-interventionFamiliarity with LGBTQ-affirmative CBT skills will be measured using a self-developed questionnaire by the researchers for the purpose of this study. This questionnaire consists of 7 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale for each item. An overall score of 35 (sum of all items) would be the highest possible score on the questionnaire and would indicate a high level of familiarity with LGBTQ-affirmative CBT skills.
Use of LGBTQ-Affirmative CBT SkillsFour-month Pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Immediate Post-intervention, Four-month Post-interventionUse LGBTQ-affirmative CBT skills will be measured using a self-developed questionnaire by the researchers for the purpose of this study. This questionnaire consists of 7 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale for each item. An overall score of 35 (sum of all items) would be the highest possible score on the questionnaire and would indicate a high level of use of LGBTQ-affirmative CBT skills.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Applied CBT Clinical Skills CompetencyFour-month Pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Immediate Post-intervention, Four-month Post-interventionCompetency in general CBT clinical skills will be measured by asking participants to provide responses to videos of fictional LGBTQ clients. Participants will watch 2 brief video clips (90 seconds each) of fictional clients presenting concerns they would like to address in psychotherapy. Participants will then be asked to write a brief paragraph describing what clinical approaches they would use in clinical treatment in order to address the challenges discussed by the fictional client. These written responses will be rated based on 22 items on a 2-point scale of 0 (did not mention at all), 1 (briefly discussed), and 2 (discussed in detail) to determine participants' LGBTQ-affirmative and general CBT skills. Items coded related to LGBTQ-affirmative CBT skills will not be double coded in the comparable items related to general CBT skills. Average scores will be taken such that 2 would be the highest possible score and would indicate a high level of competence in CBT clinical skills.
LGBTQ Cultural HumilityFour-month Pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Immediate Post-intervention, Four-month Post-interventionLGBTQ cultural humility will be measured using the Multidimensional Cultural Humility Scale (MCHS). This questionnaire is a 15-item self-report psychometrically validated measure assessing the extent to which respondents endorse an ability to maintain an other-oriented, interpersonal stance in relation to cultural identities most salient to clients. For the present study, items were adapted to specifically assess cultural humility as related to working with LGBTQ clients. An overall score of 90 (sum of all items) would be the highest possible score on the questionnaire and would indicate a high level of LGBTQ cultural humility.
Self-Reported LGBTQ Clinical Skills CompetencyFour-month Pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Immediate Post-intervention, Four-month Post-interventionCompetency in LGBTQ clinical skills will be measured using the Sexual Orientation Counselor Competency Scale (SOCCS) - Clinical Skills subscale. This subscale consists of 11-items from a psychometrically validated measure, based on a 7-point Likert scale assessing the extent to which respondents endorse clinical competence as related to their skills in working with clients of diverse sexual identities. For the present study, items have been adapted to specifically assess competence in clinical skills based on an LGBTQ-affirmative CBT framework. An overall score of 7 (arithmetic mean of all 11 items) would be the highest possible score and would indicate a high level of competence in LGBTQ clinical skills.
Content Knowledge of CBT/LGBTQ-Affirmative CBTFour-month Pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Immediate Post-intervention, Four-month Post-interventionContent knowledge of CBT/LGBTQ-affirmative CBT will be measured using a self-developed, 10-item multiple-choice measure by the researchers for the purpose of this study based on past interventional studies of LGBTQ-affirmative CBT. An overall score of 10 (i.e., answering all 10-items correctly) would be the highest possible score on the measure and would indicate a high level of content knowledge of CBT/LGBTQ-affirmative CBT.
Acceptability of LGBTQ-affirmative CBT TrainingImmediate Post-interventionAcceptability of LGBTQ-affirmative CBT will measured using a self-developed questionnaire by the researchers based on past research on training acceptability. Participants will be asked to report how many of the 11 training sessions they attended. Participants will then be asked 2 qualitative questions in regard to which of the 11 training sessions they found most and least helpful. Participants will also be asked 7 questions based on a 5-point Likert scale regarding their interest and perceived benefit from the training. An overall score of 35 (sum of all items) on the Likert scale items would be the highest possible score on the measure and would indicate a high level of perceived acceptability of the LGBTQ-affirmative CBT training.
Content Knowledge of Minority StressFour-month Pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Immediate Post-intervention, Four-month Post-InterventionContent knowledge of minority stress will be measured using a self-developed, 10-item multiple-choice measure by the researchers for the purpose of this study and based on past minority stress research. An overall score of 10 (i.e., answering all 10-items correctly) would be the highest possible score on the measure and would indicate a high level of content knowledge of minority stress.
Applied LGBTQ Clinical Skills CompetencyFour-month Pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Immediate Post-intervention, Four-month Post-interventionCompetency in LGBTQ clinical skills will be measured by asking participants to provide responses to videos of fictional LGBTQ clients. Participants will watch 2 brief video clips (90 seconds each) of fictional clients presenting concerns they would like to address in psychotherapy. Participants will then be asked to write a brief paragraph describing what clinical approaches they would use in clinical treatment in order to address the challenges discussed by the fictional client. These written responses will be rated based on 22 items on a 2-point scale of 0 (did not mention at all), 1 (briefly discussed), and 2 (discussed in detail) to determine participants' LGBTQ-affirmative and general CBT skills. Items coded related to LGBTQ-affirmative CBT skills will not be double coded in the comparable items related to general CBT skills. Average scores will be taken such that 2 would be the highest possible score and would indicate a high level of competence in LGBTQ clinical skills.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment was conducted through an online flyer emailed to listservs of mental health providers at CenterLink LGBTQ community centers. An informal webinar was also held in October 2020 for mental health providers at CenterLink LGBTQ community centers to learn more about the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Immediate Training Group
Participants will take part in 11-week LGBTQ-affirmative CBT training via Zoom for 1-hour per week. The participants in the immediate training group will take part in the first 11-week course. LGBTQ-affirmative CBT training: Participants will take part in 11-week LGBTQ-affirmative CBT training via Zoom for 1-hour per week.
61
Waitlist Control Group
Participants will take part in 11-week LGBTQ-affirmative CBT training via Zoom for 1-hour per week. The participants in the waitlist control group will take part in the second 11-week course. LGBTQ-affirmative CBT training: Participants will take part in 11-week LGBTQ-affirmative CBT training via Zoom for 1-hour per week.
60
Total121

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1415
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicImmediate Training GroupTotalWaitlist Control Group
Age, Continuous39.74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.36
37.74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.55
35.72 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.33
Age of Clients
13-17
5 Participants12 Participants7 Participants
Age of Clients
18-30
29 Participants58 Participants29 Participants
Age of Clients
31-50
23 Participants42 Participants19 Participants
Age of Clients
<5-12
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Age of Clients
51-65+
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Education Degree
Bachelor's Degree
6 Participants20 Participants14 Participants
Education Degree
Doctoral Degree
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Education Degree
High School/GED or Associate's Degree
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Education Degree
Master's Degree
50 Participants95 Participants45 Participants
Employment Status
Full-Time (40 Hours Per Week)
37 Participants66 Participants29 Participants
Employment Status
Other
2 Participants8 Participants6 Participants
Employment Status
Part-Time (Less Than 40 Hours Per Week)
19 Participants31 Participants12 Participants
Employment Status
Practicum Student/Intern
3 Participants16 Participants13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants24 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
46 Participants97 Participants51 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Number of Years Working in Mental Health6.85 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.42
6.13 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.11
5.40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.77
Number of Years Working with LGBTQ Clients4.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.37
3.58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.39
2.82 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.95
Primary Mode of Psychotherapy
Family Therapy
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Primary Mode of Psychotherapy
Group Therapy
7 Participants16 Participants9 Participants
Primary Mode of Psychotherapy
Individual Therapy
52 Participants98 Participants46 Participants
Primary Mode of Psychotherapy
Other
1 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants13 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
11 Participants22 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
43 Participants81 Participants38 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
1 participants1 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Uganda
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
60 participants119 participants59 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender Identity : Cisgender Man
14 Participants25 Participants11 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender Identity : Cisgender Woman
29 Participants66 Participants37 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender Identity : Gender Non-Binary
4 Participants12 Participants8 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender Identity : Gender Non-Conforming
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender Identity : Genderqueer
6 Participants7 Participants1 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender Identity : Other
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender Identity : Transgender Man
6 Participants6 Participants0 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender Identity : Transgender Woman
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Sexual Orientation
Asexual
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Sexual Orientation
Bisexual
6 Participants13 Participants7 Participants
Sexual Orientation
Gay
13 Participants22 Participants9 Participants
Sexual Orientation
Heterosexual/Straight
14 Participants28 Participants14 Participants
Sexual Orientation
Lesbian
9 Participants18 Participants9 Participants
Sexual Orientation
Other
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sexual Orientation
Pansexual
7 Participants13 Participants6 Participants
Sexual Orientation
Queer
11 Participants24 Participants13 Participants
Theoretical Orientation
Cognitive Behavioral (CBT)
10 Participants27 Participants17 Participants
Theoretical Orientation
Eclectic or Integrative
23 Participants44 Participants21 Participants
Theoretical Orientation
Existential
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Theoretical Orientation
Humanistic/Person-Centered
15 Participants29 Participants14 Participants
Theoretical Orientation
Missing
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Theoretical Orientation
Psychodynamic/Psychoanalytic
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Theoretical Orientation
Solution-Focused
9 Participants13 Participants4 Participants
Theoretical Orientation
Third-Wave CBT
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 610 / 60
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 610 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 610 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Familiarity With LGBTQ-Affirmative CBT Skills

Familiarity with LGBTQ-affirmative CBT skills will be measured using a self-developed questionnaire by the researchers for the purpose of this study. This questionnaire consists of 7 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale for each item. An overall score of 35 (sum of all items) would be the highest possible score on the questionnaire and would indicate a high level of familiarity with LGBTQ-affirmative CBT skills.

Time frame: Four-month Pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Immediate Post-intervention, Four-month Post-intervention

Population: Participants in the Immediate training group started training immediately after randomization, and therefore, have no data for the four-month waiting period prior to receiving the intervention. Participants in the Waitlist control group started training four months after randomization and therefore, were not assessed at the four-month follow-up time point due to completion of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate Training GroupFamiliarity With LGBTQ-Affirmative CBT SkillsImmediate Post-intervention24.34 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
Immediate Training GroupFamiliarity With LGBTQ-Affirmative CBT SkillsImmediate Pre-intervention18.30 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.76
Immediate Training GroupFamiliarity With LGBTQ-Affirmative CBT SkillsFour-month Post-intervention25.57 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
Waitlist Control GroupFamiliarity With LGBTQ-Affirmative CBT SkillsImmediate Post-intervention25.46 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.79
Waitlist Control GroupFamiliarity With LGBTQ-Affirmative CBT SkillsFour-month Pre-intervention19.00 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
Waitlist Control GroupFamiliarity With LGBTQ-Affirmative CBT SkillsImmediate Pre-intervention19.70 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.76
Primary

Use of LGBTQ-Affirmative CBT Skills

Use LGBTQ-affirmative CBT skills will be measured using a self-developed questionnaire by the researchers for the purpose of this study. This questionnaire consists of 7 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale for each item. An overall score of 35 (sum of all items) would be the highest possible score on the questionnaire and would indicate a high level of use of LGBTQ-affirmative CBT skills.

Time frame: Four-month Pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Immediate Post-intervention, Four-month Post-intervention

Population: Participants in the Immediate training group started training immediately after randomization, and therefore, have no data for the four-month waiting period prior to receiving the intervention. Participants in the Waitlist control group started training four months after randomization and therefore, were not assessed at the four-month follow-up time point due to completion of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate Training GroupUse of LGBTQ-Affirmative CBT SkillsImmediate Pre-intervention16.77 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.67
Immediate Training GroupUse of LGBTQ-Affirmative CBT SkillsImmediate Post-intervention22.93 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
Immediate Training GroupUse of LGBTQ-Affirmative CBT SkillsFour-month Post-intervention24.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.69
Waitlist Control GroupUse of LGBTQ-Affirmative CBT SkillsImmediate Pre-intervention18.46 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
Waitlist Control GroupUse of LGBTQ-Affirmative CBT SkillsFour-month Pre-intervention17.53 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
Waitlist Control GroupUse of LGBTQ-Affirmative CBT SkillsImmediate Post-intervention23.61 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
Secondary

Acceptability of LGBTQ-affirmative CBT Training

Acceptability of LGBTQ-affirmative CBT will measured using a self-developed questionnaire by the researchers based on past research on training acceptability. Participants will be asked to report how many of the 11 training sessions they attended. Participants will then be asked 2 qualitative questions in regard to which of the 11 training sessions they found most and least helpful. Participants will also be asked 7 questions based on a 5-point Likert scale regarding their interest and perceived benefit from the training. An overall score of 35 (sum of all items) on the Likert scale items would be the highest possible score on the measure and would indicate a high level of perceived acceptability of the LGBTQ-affirmative CBT training.

Time frame: Immediate Post-intervention

Population: This outcome was collected only during the assessment immediately following the intervention for each group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate Training GroupAcceptability of LGBTQ-affirmative CBT Training31.10 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.17
Waitlist Control GroupAcceptability of LGBTQ-affirmative CBT Training30.57 score on a scaleStandard Error 5.16
Secondary

Applied CBT Clinical Skills Competency

Competency in general CBT clinical skills will be measured by asking participants to provide responses to videos of fictional LGBTQ clients. Participants will watch 2 brief video clips (90 seconds each) of fictional clients presenting concerns they would like to address in psychotherapy. Participants will then be asked to write a brief paragraph describing what clinical approaches they would use in clinical treatment in order to address the challenges discussed by the fictional client. These written responses will be rated based on 22 items on a 2-point scale of 0 (did not mention at all), 1 (briefly discussed), and 2 (discussed in detail) to determine participants' LGBTQ-affirmative and general CBT skills. Items coded related to LGBTQ-affirmative CBT skills will not be double coded in the comparable items related to general CBT skills. Average scores will be taken such that 2 would be the highest possible score and would indicate a high level of competence in CBT clinical skills.

Time frame: Four-month Pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Immediate Post-intervention, Four-month Post-intervention

Population: Participants in the Immediate training group started training immediately after randomization, and therefore, have no data for the four-month waiting period prior to receiving the intervention. Participants in the Waitlist control group started training four months after randomization and therefore, were not assessed at the four-month follow-up time point due to completion of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate Training GroupApplied CBT Clinical Skills CompetencyImmediate Pre-intervention0.10 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.01
Immediate Training GroupApplied CBT Clinical Skills CompetencyImmediate Post-intervention0.17 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Immediate Training GroupApplied CBT Clinical Skills CompetencyFour-month Post-intervention0.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
Waitlist Control GroupApplied CBT Clinical Skills CompetencyFour-month Pre-intervention0.12 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.01
Waitlist Control GroupApplied CBT Clinical Skills CompetencyImmediate Pre-intervention0.12 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.01
Waitlist Control GroupApplied CBT Clinical Skills CompetencyImmediate Post-intervention0.11 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
Secondary

Applied LGBTQ Clinical Skills Competency

Competency in LGBTQ clinical skills will be measured by asking participants to provide responses to videos of fictional LGBTQ clients. Participants will watch 2 brief video clips (90 seconds each) of fictional clients presenting concerns they would like to address in psychotherapy. Participants will then be asked to write a brief paragraph describing what clinical approaches they would use in clinical treatment in order to address the challenges discussed by the fictional client. These written responses will be rated based on 22 items on a 2-point scale of 0 (did not mention at all), 1 (briefly discussed), and 2 (discussed in detail) to determine participants' LGBTQ-affirmative and general CBT skills. Items coded related to LGBTQ-affirmative CBT skills will not be double coded in the comparable items related to general CBT skills. Average scores will be taken such that 2 would be the highest possible score and would indicate a high level of competence in LGBTQ clinical skills.

Time frame: Four-month Pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Immediate Post-intervention, Four-month Post-intervention

Population: Participants in the Immediate training group started training immediately after randomization, and therefore, have no data for the four-month waiting period prior to receiving the intervention. Participants in the Waitlist control group started training four months after randomization and therefore, were not assessed at the four-month follow-up time point due to completion of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate Training GroupApplied LGBTQ Clinical Skills CompetencyImmediate Pre-intervention0.11 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
Immediate Training GroupApplied LGBTQ Clinical Skills CompetencyImmediate Post-intervention0.24 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Immediate Training GroupApplied LGBTQ Clinical Skills CompetencyFour-month Post-intervention0.22 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Waitlist Control GroupApplied LGBTQ Clinical Skills CompetencyImmediate Pre-intervention0.14 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
Waitlist Control GroupApplied LGBTQ Clinical Skills CompetencyImmediate Post-intervention0.31 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Waitlist Control GroupApplied LGBTQ Clinical Skills CompetencyFour-month Pre-intervention0.12 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
Secondary

Content Knowledge of CBT/LGBTQ-Affirmative CBT

Content knowledge of CBT/LGBTQ-affirmative CBT will be measured using a self-developed, 10-item multiple-choice measure by the researchers for the purpose of this study based on past interventional studies of LGBTQ-affirmative CBT. An overall score of 10 (i.e., answering all 10-items correctly) would be the highest possible score on the measure and would indicate a high level of content knowledge of CBT/LGBTQ-affirmative CBT.

Time frame: Four-month Pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Immediate Post-intervention, Four-month Post-intervention

Population: Participants in the Immediate training group started training immediately after randomization, and therefore, have no data for the four-month waiting period prior to receiving the intervention. Participants in the Waitlist control group started training four months after randomization and therefore, were not assessed at the four-month follow-up time point due to completion of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate Training GroupContent Knowledge of CBT/LGBTQ-Affirmative CBTImmediate Pre-intervention5.36 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Immediate Training GroupContent Knowledge of CBT/LGBTQ-Affirmative CBTFour-month Post-intervention6.48 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Immediate Training GroupContent Knowledge of CBT/LGBTQ-Affirmative CBTImmediate Post-intervention6.77 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Waitlist Control GroupContent Knowledge of CBT/LGBTQ-Affirmative CBTFour-month Pre-intervention5.48 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Waitlist Control GroupContent Knowledge of CBT/LGBTQ-Affirmative CBTImmediate Pre-intervention5.46 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Waitlist Control GroupContent Knowledge of CBT/LGBTQ-Affirmative CBTImmediate Post-intervention6.80 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Secondary

Content Knowledge of Minority Stress

Content knowledge of minority stress will be measured using a self-developed, 10-item multiple-choice measure by the researchers for the purpose of this study and based on past minority stress research. An overall score of 10 (i.e., answering all 10-items correctly) would be the highest possible score on the measure and would indicate a high level of content knowledge of minority stress.

Time frame: Four-month Pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Immediate Post-intervention, Four-month Post-Intervention

Population: Participants in the Immediate training group started training immediately after randomization, and therefore, have no data for the four-month waiting period prior to receiving the intervention. Participants in the Waitlist control group started training four months after randomization and therefore, were not assessed at the four-month follow-up time point due to completion of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate Training GroupContent Knowledge of Minority StressImmediate Post-intervention8.05 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Immediate Training GroupContent Knowledge of Minority StressImmediate Pre-intervention7.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Immediate Training GroupContent Knowledge of Minority StressFour-month Post-intervention7.82 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Waitlist Control GroupContent Knowledge of Minority StressImmediate Pre-intervention7.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Waitlist Control GroupContent Knowledge of Minority StressFour-month Pre-intervention7.15 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Waitlist Control GroupContent Knowledge of Minority StressImmediate Post-intervention7.63 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Secondary

LGBTQ Cultural Humility

LGBTQ cultural humility will be measured using the Multidimensional Cultural Humility Scale (MCHS). This questionnaire is a 15-item self-report psychometrically validated measure assessing the extent to which respondents endorse an ability to maintain an other-oriented, interpersonal stance in relation to cultural identities most salient to clients. For the present study, items were adapted to specifically assess cultural humility as related to working with LGBTQ clients. An overall score of 90 (sum of all items) would be the highest possible score on the questionnaire and would indicate a high level of LGBTQ cultural humility.

Time frame: Four-month Pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Immediate Post-intervention, Four-month Post-intervention

Population: Participants in the Immediate training group started training immediately after randomization, and therefore, have no data for the four-month waiting period prior to receiving the intervention. Participants in the Waitlist control group started training four months after randomization and therefore, were not assessed at the four-month follow-up time point due to completion of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate Training GroupLGBTQ Cultural HumilityImmediate pre-intervention76.48 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Immediate Training GroupLGBTQ Cultural HumilityImmediate post-intervention77.34 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.88
Immediate Training GroupLGBTQ Cultural HumilityFour-month Post-intervention78.55 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.74
Waitlist Control GroupLGBTQ Cultural HumilityImmediate post-intervention77.27 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.27
Waitlist Control GroupLGBTQ Cultural HumilityFour-month pre-intervention75.28 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
Waitlist Control GroupLGBTQ Cultural HumilityImmediate pre-intervention75.76 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.03
Secondary

Self-Reported LGBTQ Clinical Skills Competency

Competency in LGBTQ clinical skills will be measured using the Sexual Orientation Counselor Competency Scale (SOCCS) - Clinical Skills subscale. This subscale consists of 11-items from a psychometrically validated measure, based on a 7-point Likert scale assessing the extent to which respondents endorse clinical competence as related to their skills in working with clients of diverse sexual identities. For the present study, items have been adapted to specifically assess competence in clinical skills based on an LGBTQ-affirmative CBT framework. An overall score of 7 (arithmetic mean of all 11 items) would be the highest possible score and would indicate a high level of competence in LGBTQ clinical skills.

Time frame: Four-month Pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Immediate Post-intervention, Four-month Post-intervention

Population: Participants in the Immediate training group started training immediately after randomization, and therefore, have no data for the four-month waiting period prior to receiving the intervention. Participants in the Waitlist control group started training four months after randomization and therefore, were not assessed at the four-month follow-up time point due to completion of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Immediate Training GroupSelf-Reported LGBTQ Clinical Skills CompetencyImmediate Pre-intervention3.31 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Immediate Training GroupSelf-Reported LGBTQ Clinical Skills CompetencyImmediate Post-intervention5.05 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Immediate Training GroupSelf-Reported LGBTQ Clinical Skills CompetencyFour-month Post-intervention5.33 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Waitlist Control GroupSelf-Reported LGBTQ Clinical Skills CompetencyFour-month Pre-intervention3.30 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Waitlist Control GroupSelf-Reported LGBTQ Clinical Skills CompetencyImmediate Pre-intervention3.14 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Waitlist Control GroupSelf-Reported LGBTQ Clinical Skills CompetencyImmediate Post-intervention5.03 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026