Skip to content

Fluid Challenges and Microcirculation

Impact of Intraoperative Fluid Challenges Administration on Macro and Microcirculation in Patients Undergoing High-risk Abdominal Surgery and Situated in the Gray Zone of Pulse Pressure Variation

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04559178
Acronym
FC
Enrollment
10
Registered
2020-09-22
Start date
2021-01-25
Completion date
2021-08-30
Last updated
2022-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgery

Brief summary

The goal of this prospective observational study is to assess the impact of fluid challenge administration on macro and microcirculation in patients situated in the gray zone during a high risk abdominal surgery

Detailed description

Fluid optimization is a key goal in anesthesia. It allows to titrate fluid bolus based on flow variables or dynamic parameters of fluid responsiveness (pulse pressure variation (PPV) or stroke volume variation (SVV)). When PPV or SVV is above 13%, the patient will usually respond to a bolus of fluid while when PPV or SVV is below 9%, the patient will normally not respond to it. Between 9% and 13%, it is a gray zone where the effect of a fluid bolus is uncertain. The overall goal of fluid bolus administration is of course to optimize macrocirculation (stroke volume and cardiac output) but also (and probably more importantly) end organ tissue perfusion. However, regional tissue perfusion is not widely monitored during surgery. However, we do have some monitoring tools to assess microcirculation at the bedside. Investigation of microcirculation in addition to macro circulation may allow clinicians to know if a patient situated in the gray zone may or not increase microcirculation variables while macrocirculation variables are well known to be of little value to predict fluid responsiveness. The goal of this study is to assess microcirculation variables in patients situated in the gray zone (PPV between 9%-13%), and to assess macro and microcirculation responses to a standardized fluid challenge of 4 ml/kg of a balanced crystalloid solution.

Interventions

OTHERFluid challenge

fluid challenge administration when patient is in the gray zone

Sponsors

Erasme University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing a high-risk abdominal surgery * Patients equipped with a minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring device in order to optimize fluid administration

Exclusion criteria

* Atrial fibrillation * Ejection fraction \<40%

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Microvascular flow indexday 0Comparison of this index before and after the fluid challenge

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026