Skip to content

Comparison of NOSES and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer

Comparison of NOSES and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04559087
Enrollment
200
Registered
2020-09-22
Start date
2018-01-01
Completion date
2022-04-30
Last updated
2020-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

Minimally invasive surgery, natural orififice specimen, radical resectiong of rectal cancer, laparoscopic surgery

Brief summary

Radical surgery for rectal cancer has evolved from the initial concept of total mesorctal excision (TME) to the wide application of laparoscopic surgery in the radical treatment of rectal cancer. After 30 years' rapid development, nowdays laparoscopic TME surgery for rectal cancer has become the first choice for those patients with rectal cancer. However, the auxiliary incision of the abdominal wall which is used to remove tumor specimens is contrary to the current concept of minimally invasive surgery. Avoiding abdominal wall incisions has become a common appeal of gastrointestinal surgeons and patients with rectal cancer. Natural orififice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) can solve the problem of abdominal wall auxiliary incision, which complete rectal cancer radical resection and gastrointestinal reconstruction under the full laparoscopic. The specimens are taken out through the natural orifice (rectum or vagina) without an auxiliary incision, which is more in line with minimally invasive practice and easier to operate. Researching on the progress of laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer in NOSES aims to provide a certain reference for this operation.

Interventions

PROCEDURELaparoscopic Surgery

NOSES:Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) is the opening of a hollow viscus that already communicates with the outside world, such as the vagina or distal gastrointestinal tract, in order to remove a specimen. The premise of this technique is to reduce the trauma required to remove the specimen with the expectation that this may improve outcomes. Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery:Surgical specimens were taken out through abdominal wall.

Sponsors

Zunyi Medical College
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients aged between 18 and 80 years; (2) histopathology confirmed as colorectal adenocarcinoma; (3) preoperative imaging (CT and MR) assessments showed that colorectal cancer did not penetrate the serosa (≤T3); (4) tumor circumference \<5 cm; (5) enhanced chest and abdominal pelvic CT scans before operation excluded liver metastasis, lung metastasis, and other distant organ metastases.

Exclusion criteria

* The preoperative

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative complicationsOne month after operationpulmonary infection,Urinary tract infection,anal function,intestinal obstruction,Anastomotic bleeding,etc.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
survival3-year and 5-year after operation3-year and 5-year Overall survival rate

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactFujian Xu, Master
911583440@qq.com+8615895864837
Backup ContactMing Xie, MD
2581303091@qq.com+8615519202000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026