Motivational Interviewing
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of training with a virtual standardized patient on the acquisition and maintenance of motivational interviewing skills compared with traditional academic study.
Detailed description
Motivational interviewing is an evidence-based counseling approach that aims to increase a patient's motivation to make positive health changes in their lives. A common training method for medical professionals is the use of human standardized patients, who are actors who pretend to be patients for educational interviews. Standardized patients are expensive and it is challenging to maintain an adequate pool of patient actors. Accordingly, after licensure or medical boards, health professionals typically adopt new evidence-based practices, like motivational interviewing, without human standardized patient training experiences. Given the established importance of post-training coaching and feedback to the acquisition of motivational interviewing, innovative training methods are needed. Computer virtual patients may provide a cost-effective alternative that is scalable and supports dissemination of evidence-based practices. This study will evaluate the efficacy of a virtual standardized patient, relative to academic study, for training motivational interviewing among health care professionals from the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense.
Interventions
OTHERVirtual Standardized Patient
Computer program that presented a virtual human patient
OTHERAcademic Study
Study of a summary of motivational interviewing concepts and techniques.
Sponsors
VA Puget Sound Health Care System
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
Motivational interviewing skill is coded by assessors blind to training condition and assessment time point.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* All health care staff (e.g., physicians, nurses, social workers, psychologists) from supporting service lines are eligible to participate in the study.
Exclusion criteria
* 8 hours or more of formal training in MI in the year prior to baseline assessment. * Successfully completed participation in the VA Evidence Based Practice roll-out of MI. * Served as MI trainers or have conducted research on MI at any time * Do not anticipate being available for the full duration of the training study (according to their verbal self-report)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity 4.2.1 between the conditions | Change in Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity 4.2.1 from Baseline to post-training [approximately 2-weeks after baseline] | The Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity 4.2.1 is a behavioral coding system for motivational interviewing (MI) skill that involves observer ratings of 4 items on a 5-point Likert-type scale and behavior counts. The 5-point scores for Cultivating Change Talk and Softening Sustain Talk are averaged for a Technical Global summary score, and 5-point scores for Partnership and Empathy are averaged for a Relational Global summary score. Behavior counts include simple reflections, complex reflections and questions posed to patients. These behavior counts generate 2 summary scores; the percentage of reflections that are complex reflections and the ratio of reflections to questions. Participants are also categorized as meeting 'fair' and 'good' MI skill proficiency cut points for each of the 4 summary scores. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in Motivational Interviewing Self-efficacy Scale between the conditions | Change in Motivational Interviewing Self-efficacy Scale from Baseline to post-training [approximately 2-weeks after baseline] | 14-item self-report measure of motivational interviewing self-efficacy |
| Difference in Provider Knowledge, Skills, and Confidence Survey between the conditions | Change in Provider Knowledge, Skills, and Confidence Survey from baseline to post-training [approximately 2-weeks after baseline] | Self-reported 3-item measure of MI working knowledge, skills and confidence |
| Difference in Helpful Responses Questionnaire between the conditions | Change in Helpful Responses Questionnaire from Baseline to post-training [approximately 2-weeks after baseline] | Open-response questionnaire measuring reflective listening skills. Six paragraphs representing discrete things people with a problem might say are presented and participants are asked to write the next thing they would say if they wanted to be helpful. Written responses are coded for the complexity of reflective listening. |
| Difference in Motivational Knowledge Test-Revised between the conditions | Change in Motivational Knowledge Test-Revised from baseline to post-training [approximately 2-weeks after baseline] | Objective, 18-item multiple choice test of motivational interviewing knowledge |
| Difference in Provider Training Satisfaction Survey between the conditions | Post-training [approximately 2-weeks after baseline] | An 11-item satisfaction survey that assesses participants' satisfaction with the training provided and the degree to which the training enhanced their abilities and preparedness to use MI. |
| Difference in Motivational Interviewing Knowledge and Attitudes Test between the conditions | Change in Motivational Interviewing Knowledge and Attitudes Test from baseline to post-training [approximately 2-weeks after baseline] | Objective, 14-item test of motivational interviewing knowledge. The measure concludes with a list of MI consistent, inconsistent, or neutral statements and the participant is asked to identify the correct MI principles. |
Outcome results
None listed