Skip to content

Evaluation of Marginal Integrity Using Bioactive Cement Incementation of Indirect Composite Blocks

Evaluation of Marginal Integrity Using Modified USPHS Criteria of a Bioactive Cement in Comparison to Resin Cement in Cementation of Indirect Composite Blocks: A Randomized Clinical Trial 12 Month Follow up

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04557657
Enrollment
40
Registered
2020-09-21
Start date
2019-09-01
Completion date
2021-03-31
Last updated
2021-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Resin Cement

Keywords

Composite blocks, Cad/Cam, Cerec

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate of marginal integrity of indirect composite restoration after cementation by a bioactive cement in comparison to dual cure resin cement using Modified USPHS criteria

Detailed description

The study will be conducted in Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, The operator in charge will be: Mohamed Sherif . The researcher will bear ultimate responsibility for all activities associated with the conduct of a research project including recruitment of patients, explaining and performing the procedures to them,A total of 36 volunteer patients with Patients with badly broken vital teeth with minimum of two remaining walls. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups according to type of cement (S) where in group S1, Restoration will be cemented with resin cement ; while group S2,Restoration will be cemented with active cement. Each restoration will be assessed after three, six months and one year using modified USPH Criteria Marginal Discoloration, Recurrent Caries and Marginal Chipping with scale of Alpha and non alpha

Interventions

DRUGActive bio Activa

Cement that release fluoride

Resin Cement Convinonal

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

36 volunteer assigned randomly into 2 equal groups of 18

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with badly broken vital teeth with minimum of two remaining walls * Adult Males or female 16- 65 years old * Good oral hygiene measures with a good gingival condition * Cooperative patients approving to participate in the study * Free of any medical condition that interfere with procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a compromised medical history. * Severe or active periodontal disease * Endodontically treated teeth * Severe medical complications Lack of compliance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Marginal Discoloration12 MonthsCheck Marginal Discoloration Using Modified USPH criteria

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026