Skip to content

Auricular VNS Following Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Following Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04557618
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-09-21
Start date
2021-01-05
Completion date
2028-12-31
Last updated
2025-12-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Keywords

Vagal nerve stimulation

Brief summary

This study will evaluate whether non-invasive auricular vagal nerve stimulation lowers inflammatory markers, and improves outcomes following spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Detailed description

Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) has been studied in several inflammatory conditions, and has been implemented in animal models of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) with promising results. The purpose of the proposed study is to determine how applying auricular VNS in patients presenting with spontaneous SAH impacts their expression of inflammatory markers in their blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and how it impacts their clinical course and outcomes. This study will involve randomizing patients to stimulation with VNS, or sham stimulation. Blood and CSF will be collected on admission, and serially throughout the patient's admission. Clinical events tracked during the hospital stay include development of cerebral vasospasm, need for CSF diversion via a shunt, stress-induced cardiomyopathy, and development of stroke or global cerebral ischemia. Outcomes following admission will include functional scores at discharge, and at follow-up visits for up to 2 years after discharge.

Interventions

Transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation

Transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve ear clip applied without current

Sponsors

Anna Huguenard
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

All participants will be fitted with an auricular stimulator, but blinded to whether they are receiving stimulation or not. Outcome scores will be assessed and recorded by clinicians blinded to treatment arm.

Intervention model description

Participants are assigned to either stimulation or sham stimulation arms

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage

Exclusion criteria

* Trauma-induced subarachnoid hemorrhage * Ongoing chemotherapy * Taking immunosuppressive medications for other medical illnesses * Presence of a pacemaker * Prolonged bradycardia at time of admission

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inflammatory markers in the serum on admissionOn hospital day 1TNF alpha from blood draw
Change in inflammatory markers in the serumThrough hospital admission, average of 4 weeksTNF alpha from blood draws
Inflammatory markers in the CSF on admissionOn hospital day 1TNF alpha from cerebrospinal fluid
Change in inflammatory markers in the CSFThrough hospital admission, average of 4 weeksTNF alpha from cerebrospinal fluid
Cerebral vasospasmThrough hospital admission, average of 4 weeksPresence of moderate/severe radiographic vasospasm
HydrocephalusThrough hospital admission, average of 4 weeksNeed for permanent CSF diversion via a ventricular shunt

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in inflammatory markers in the CSFThrough hospital admission, average of 4 weeksIL-12, GM-CSF, IFN gamma, IL-1b, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, from cerebrospinal fluid
Clinical outcome2 yearsModified Rankin Scale for Neurological Disability (minimum score 0, maximum score 6, better outcomes have lower scores)
Cerebral vasospasmThrough hospital admission, average of 4 weeksAdditional features of vasospasm: 1) Number of vascular studies obtained, 2) Need for blood pressure augmentation or hypervolemia, 3) Need for intraarterial or intrathecal vasodilator, 4) Need for angioplasty
Cerebral ischemiaThrough hospital admission, average of 4 weeksPresence of cerebral ischemia based on the following criteria: Radiographic evidence of a new infarct or stroke
HydrocephalusThrough hospital admission, average of 4 weeksDuration of temporary CSF diversion via an external ventricular drain
Inflammatory markers in the serum on admissionOn hospital day 1IL-12, GM-CSF, IFN gamma, IL-1b, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8from blood draws
Change in inflammatory markers in the serumThrough hospital admission, average of 4 weeksIL-12, GM-CSF, IFN gamma, IL-1b, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8 from blood draws
Inflammatory markers in the CSF on admissionOn hospital day 1IL-12, GM-CSF, IFN gamma, IL-1b, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, from cerebrospinal fluid
Stressed-induced cardiomyopathyThrough hospital admission, average of 4 weeksPresence of stressed-induced cardiomyopathy based on any of the following criteria: 1) New troponin elevation, 2) New EKG changes (specifically ST segment elevation, ST segment depression, left bundle branch block, prolonged QT interval), 3) New findings of cardiomyopathy on echocardiogram

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactAnna L Huguenard, MD
ahuguenard@wustl.edu3144506698

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026