Skip to content

Comparison of Quality of Vision After Bifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation

Comparison of Quality of Vision After Bifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04557579
Enrollment
97
Registered
2020-09-21
Start date
2018-12-24
Completion date
2020-01-22
Last updated
2020-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intraocular Lens

Brief summary

To compare the visual performance of the extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) to bifocal and spherical monofocal IOL

Detailed description

This study was conducted from 2018 to 2020. This study included patients who were with presence of cataract in both eyes, age between 50 and 80 years, and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of both eyes under 20/40. Phacoemulsification cataract surgery was arranged for both eyes for all patients. The study groups of IOL models include EDOF Symfony IOL (AMO, Santa Ana, CA, USA), bifocal Restor +2.5D IOL (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA), and monofocal Sensar AR40e IOL (AMO, Santa Ana, CA, USA). The patients were routinely examined preoperatively as well as 1 month after surgery for far and near visual acuity (in LogMAR unit). Contrast sensitivity, wavefront aberration and quality of vision questionnaire was measured at the 1-month postoperative visit. These aforementioned outcomes were recorded and compared between groups.

Interventions

PROCEDUREClear corneal phacoemulsification and IOL implantation

Clear corneal phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were performed by 2 surgeons (Chao-Kai Chang and Hung-Yuan Lin) by using an identical technique to minimize differences in surgically induced aberrations between groups. The surgical process involved topical anesthesia, a 3-step clear corneal incision (2.75 mm) at 180° (temporal in both eyes), a 5.0-mm continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification using the stop-and-chop technique, IOL implantation with an injector, IOL centration, and a sutureless incision. The study IOL models include EDOF Symfony IOL (AMO, Santa Ana, CA, USA), bifocal Restor +2.5D IOL (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA), and monofocal Sensar AR40e IOL (AMO, Santa Ana, CA, USA).

Sponsors

Taipei Nobel Eye Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* presence of cataract in both eyes * age between 50 and 80 years * CDVA of both eyes under 20/40 * Phacoemulsification cataract surgery was arranged for both eyes

Exclusion criteria

* complicated cataract * corneal opacities or irregularities * corneal astigmatism \> 1.5 diopter * dry eye (Schirmer's test I ≤ 5mm) * amblyopia * anisometropia * surgical complications such as posterior capsular bag rupture or vitreous loss * IOL tilt or decentration * coexisting ocular pathologies * glaucoma * non-dilating pupil * history of intraocular surgery, laser therapy, or retinopathy * optic nerve or macular diseases * refusal or unable to maintain follow-up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ophthalmic examinations1 month after surgery.far uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), near UCVA in LogMAR unit
Wavefront examinationat the 1-month postoperative visitWavefront analysis was performed only at the 1-month postoperative visit with an AMO WaveScan Hartmann-Shack sensor (Santa Clara, CA, USA). The wavefront maps were analyzed using a 6-mm pupil diameter and a Zernike polynomial expansion up to the sixth-order of Zernike coefficients. Higher order aberrations including RMS errors of horizontal coma aberration (Z 3,1), spherical aberration (4,0), trefoil aberration and the higher order aberrations were assessed.
Contrast sensitivityat the 1-month postoperative visitCS was also measured at the 1-month postoperative visit using the Vector Vision CSV-1000 (Greenville, OH, USA) chart. All subjects were tested at the recommended distance of 8 feet. The CSV-1000 consists of a series of circular achromatic sine-wave patches having a 1.5-in. diameter and comprising 4 rows, each corresponding to one of 4 spatial frequencies: 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (cpd). We selected 3, 6 and 12 cpd for analysis.
Questionnaireat the 1-month postoperative visitSubjective QoV was evaluated using a questionnaire adopted from a near-activity 19-item questionnaire and the NEI-RQL-42. Our questionnaire contains 11 questions and the subscales include far vision, diurnal fluctuation, glare and halos, spectacle dependence, near vision, and intermediate vision. In general, questionnaires were completed without assistance; however, on the patient's request, explanations of the questions were provided.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026