Skip to content

Erector Spinae vs TAP in Lower Abdominal Surgery

Comparison Between Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Postoperative Analgesia for Lower Abdominal Cancer Surgery. Randomised Double Blinded Control Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04555993
Enrollment
62
Registered
2020-09-21
Start date
2020-02-28
Completion date
2020-10-15
Last updated
2020-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Pain

Keywords

erector spinae block, TAP Block, abdominal surgery

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the analgesic effect and safety profile of erector spinae plane block with transverses abdominis plane block in controlling peri-operative pain for lower abdominal cancer surgery.

Detailed description

Pain triggers a complex biochemical and physiological stress response leading to impairment of pulmonary, immunological and metabolic functions. Opioids are the current gold standard drug for postoperative pain relief, however exposure to large doses lead to multiple side effects of varying significance such as nausea, vomiting, dizziness, constipation, respiratory depression, hypoventilation and sleep breathing disorders. Therefore strategies other than opioids are recommended without sacrificing proper and effective analgesia. Especially in cancer patients who are more susceptible to tolerance and addiction. The Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block, is a regional anaesthesia technique used effectively in laparotomies. Unilateral analgesia to the skin, muscles, and parietal peritoneum of the anterior abdominal wall will be achieved without affecting visceral pain, when the anterior rami of the lower six thoracic nerves (T7-T12) and the first lumbar nerve (L1) are blocked. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) was shown to be an effective analgesic option for different types of surgeries. It's relatively a simple block, drug is injected in the plane between the erector spinae muscle and the vertebral transverse process. Blocking the ventral and dorsal rami of spinal nerves on the paravertebral area distributed from T2-T4 to L1-L2 and gives good coverage to visceral pain. Owing to the lower risk of blood vessel damage and neural damage compared to the epidural or the paravertebral block. Both blocks haven't been compared to each other in this type of surgery before.

Interventions

PROCEDURElower abdominal surgery

Patients will undergo lower abdominal surgery under general anesthesia.

OTHERErector spinae plane block

patients will receive erector spinae plane block using 20 mL levobupivacaine (0.25%).

OTHERTransversus abdominis plane block

patients will receive transversus abdominis plane block using 20 mL levobupivacaine (0.25%).

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute, Egypt
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Physical status ASA II. * Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 Years. * Cancer patients undergoing laparotomies for radical cystectomy or radical hysterectomy or low anterior resection (lower abdominal procedures). * Patient is able to provide a written informed consent. * Body mass index (BMI): \> 20 kg/m2 and \< 40 kg/m2.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \<18 years or \>65 years. * BMI \<20 kg/m2 and \>40 kg/m2. * Known sensitivity to local anaesthetics and morphine. * History of psychological disorders and/or chronic pain. * Significant liver or renal insufficiency. * Contraindication to regional anaesthesia e.g. local sepsis, preexisting peripheral neuropathies and coagulopathy. * Patient refusal. * Severe respiratory or cardiac disorders. * Pregnancy. * ASA III-IV.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total morphine consumption24 hoursThe total amount of morphine which was consumed post-operatively measured in milligrams

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraoperative fentanyl consumption.intraoperativeThe total amount of fentanyl which was consumed during the surgery measured in milligrams

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart rate24 hoursthe number of heart beats in one minute
Postoperative nausea and vomiting24 hours postoperativethe number of patients who had nausea and vomiting
mean arterial blood pressure24 hoursthe mean arteiral blood pressure measurend in mmHg
Numerical rating scale for pain assessment.24 hoursThis is a numerical rating scale for pain assessment which ranges from 0 to 10 with the least pain at scale 0 and the worst pain at scale 10
Time for first rescue analgesia.24 hours postoperativethe time at which the patient will request an analgesic

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary Contactahmed hasanin, Professor
ahmedmohamedhasanin@gmail.com+201095076954
Backup Contactahmed zaghloul, Professor
a_zaghloul2000@yahoo.com00201001839591

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026