Skip to content

Toxins Removal and Inflammatory State modulAtion During Online Hemodiafiltration: Comparison of Two Different Dialyzers

Toxins Removal and Inflammatory State modulAtion During Online Hemodiafiltration: Comparison of Two Different Dialyzers

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04554498
Acronym
TRIAD2
Enrollment
16
Registered
2020-09-18
Start date
2022-01-01
Completion date
2024-05-01
Last updated
2021-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemodialysis Complication, Inflammation, Uremic; Toxemia

Brief summary

The primary goal of the study is to evaluate in patients on three times a week on-line HDF the efficacy, in terms of toxin removal and modulation of the inflammatory state, of two different dialyzers: Helixone versus Asimmetric cellulose triacetate (ATA).

Detailed description

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have a significantly increased cardiovascular mortality rate compared to the general population. According to the USRDS (United States Renal Data System), in 2017 the prevalence of cardiovascular disease in the United States was 65.8% in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), compared to 31.9% of the subjects with stable renal function (https://www.usrds.org/2017/view/v1\_04.aspx). In the natural history of nephropathy, besides the traditional cardiovascular risk factors, an increasingly important role is played by the nontraditional factors related to uremia and dialysis treatment, namely anemia, hyperhomocysteinemia, malnutrition, hyperparathyroidism, electrolyte imbalance, and above all chronic inflammatory state and oxidative stress. The main components of dialysis-related inflammatory response include neutrophil and monocyte activation, cytokine release, oxidative stress with production of free radicals, lipid and protein oxidation, and alterations in blood redox state. There is much evidence to indicate that ESRD patients, especially those on dialysis, are exposed to increased oxidative and carbonyl stress, that cause chemical modifications of proteins and accumulation of AGEs (advanced glycation end products). The formation of AGEs occurs through Maillard reaction, a non-enzymatic glycation of peptide amino groups, resulting in protein structural and functional alteration and production of reactive carbonyl species . Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between the levels of tissue AGEs and the development of various complications, since the accumulation of AGEs constitutes an index of hyperglycemia, oxidative stress and inflammation. The activation and up-regulation of the AGE receptors, including the main one RAGE (AGE Receptor), leads to the initiation of inflammatory cascades involved in the formation of atherosclerotic plaques and endothelial dysfunction, and lastly in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. AGEs are also related to the thickening of the intima-media tunica of the carotid arteries, considered a marker of arteriosclerosis, as clinically confirmed by the close relationship between coronary artery disease and atherosclerotic complications in diabetes and renal failure. Besides AGEs, a huge pattern of protein-bound toxins and of middle molecular weight uremic toxins are known to contribute to the uremic syndrome in terms of cardiovascular complications, inflammation and fibrosis . Concerning protein-bound uremic toxins, p-cresyl sulfate and indoxyl sulfate have received considerable attention recently. Among middle molecules, B2M, free light chains and FGF23 have been identified as markers of disease progression and mortality in CKD and hemodialysis. Furthermore, the activation of leukocytes, both in response to the exposure to dialysis membranes and as a consequence of the retrotransportation of substances that promote the expression of cytokines from the dialysate, increases the release of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6. The biocompatibility and flow properties of the different filters can influence the inflammatory and oxidative response to dialysis and the levels of oxidized molecules. In general, short-term dialysis with high-flow membranes has been shown to decrease plasma levels of oxidized low-density lipoproteins, regardless of the filter material. Nonetheless, the introduction of high-flux membranes, which increased clearance of middle molecules, appears to be inadequate to improve patient survival, as reported by two major randomized trials, the HEMO study \[24\] and the MPO study. The use of on-line HDF, that combines convective and diffusive solute removal, can counterbalance the rapid decrease of middle molecule diffusion obtained with high flux hemodialysis. The integration of diffusion with convection allows a more modest sieving coefficient decrease for middle molecular weight solutes. To date, evidence from four randomized controlled trials on HDF suggests, although not definitely, that HDF with convection volumes \>20 L results in better patient outcomes . Moreover, a correlation of the membrane typology with inflammation and oxidative stress in the medium-long term was found in patients undergoing chronic dialysis treatment. A prospective study in a cohort of 50 patients who started hemodialysis with a high-flux polysulfone membrane (HF80 series, Fresenius Medical Care, St. Wendel, Germany) evaluated the variation of the inflammation and oxidative stress biomarkers. The results showed significantly increased circulating levels of IL-6, C-reactive protein (CRP) and higher carbonylation rate in dialysis patients compared to healthy controls in the first year of observation, and this trend was maintained in the following 12 months. Successive studies investigated the long-term effects on inflammation and oxidative stress of dialysis with Helixone (Fresenius Medical Care), another type of high-flux polysulfone membrane designed to maximize the clearance of uremic toxins of average molecular weight (\> 500 Daltons, Da) compared to conventional high-flux membranes. The introduction of changes as reduced hollow fiber wall thickness (≈35 μm), smaller inner diameter (≈185 μm) and higher average pore size (≈3.3 nm) has improved the clearance of medium molecular weight molecules, including β2-microglobulin (B2M), limiting the passage of larger molecules like albumin, without significant effects on inflammatory parameters . The features of synthetic membranes related their chemical composition and the asymmetric structure of the fibers make them preferable for new highly-convective therapies, such as high-volume hemodiafiltration (HDF), only partially allowed with cellulose. However, cellulose triacetate (CTA) and modified cellulose membranes remain the best option for the patients with hypersensitivity reactions to synthetic fibers. Although synthetic membranes, including those based on polysulfone, have a lower risk of hypersensitization than non-biocompatible ones (such as Cuprophane), in some cases adverse reactions have been reported, plausibly due to the contact between the dialyzer itself with plasma proteins and platelets. Moreover, the choice of polysulfone membranes has been proven to affect the intracellular and serum levels of bisphenol A (BPA, molecular weight 228.3 kDa), a ubiquitous environmental toxicant found in plastic food and beverage containers, as well as in some dialyzers, with several detrimental effects. BPA is considered an endocrine-disrupting chemical that acts mainly as a female hormone: it is associated with reproductive dysfunction, immune abnormality and increased incidence of cancer. Patients on hemodialysis are a high-risk population for BPA overload, because the normal urinary elimination of the conjugated molecule decreases with low renal function. For these reasons, BPA can be thought as a uremic toxin, similarly to p-cresol, and a particular attention should be given to BPA-containing medical devices, including dialysis membranes. Mas et al. compared BPA-free and BPA-containing dialyzers in 72 patients under on-line HDF, using a prospective 9-month, crossover study design. BPA-free dialyzers determined a greater long-term decrease in BPA levels compared to BPA-containing dialyzers, although at three months the difference was not significant. This may be due to the use of the on-line HDF technique that has been related to lower BPA levels than conventional hemodialysis. Recently, a new generation filter in asymmetric triacetate (ATA) has been introduced, born from a technology that combines the requirements of synthetic membranes for the possibility of being used with high-volume HDF and the advantages of natural fibers (cellulose) in terms of reduced allergic reactions. These novel ATA membranes have been demonstrated to achieve satisfactory Kt and convection volume, with good biocompatibility and inflammatory profiles, indicating them as a valuable option for patients allergic to synthetic membranes under HDF treatment.

Interventions

DEVICE1) high flux hemodiafiltration thrice -weekly during a 24 month follow-up

1. the comparison of the effects of the two membranes on the serum levels of albumin, B2M, CRP, myoglobin, light chains, retinol binding protein, homocysteine, p-cresol, indoxyl sulfate, BPA, alpha-1-microglobulin (A1M), FGF23 (fibroblast growth factor 23), and inflammatory cytokines; 2. the evaluation of the changes induced by the two filters on lymphocyte subsets, monocyte activation and senescence, and apoptosis rate; 3. the definition of the impact of the two membranes on the accumulation of AGEs as an index of metabolic and oxidative stress, determined by a non-invasive method based on the measurement of skin autofluorescence through a dedicated device (AGE Reader, DiagnOptics Technologies BV, Groningen, Netherlands).

Sponsors

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of Bologna
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with chronic renal failure under periodic standard bicarbonate hemodialysis; * Three times a week dialysis session; * Residual diuresis \<200 mL/day; * Age \>18 years; * Vascular access for hemodialysis with blood flow \>250 mL/minute; * Need of on-line hemodiafiltration (HDF) for signs of middle molecules intoxication (e.g. B2M \>30 mg/L, peripheral neuropathy, cardiovascular comorbidities) or for intradialytic hypotension.

Exclusion criteria

* Acute coronary syndrome; * Acute hemorrage; * Enrollment in another study protocol; * Active infection; * Malignancy; * Inability to provide written signed consent to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurement of uremic toxins24 months. Blood samples will be drawn at Time 0 (on starting the study when the patients starts HDF treatment), after 1 month, after 3 months, after 6 months, after 12 months, and after 24 months (study end)Beta 2 microglobulin (B2M), C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, myoglobin, light chains, retinol binding protein, homocysteine, p-cresol, indoxyl sulfate, BPA, alpha-2-macroglobulin (A2M), FGF23 (fibroblast growth factor 23)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patients survival24 monthsthe mortality rate of the patients will be recorded
Body impedance analysis24 months.Body impedance analysis will be carried out monthly through Electro fluid graph machine
AGEs measurements24 monthsAGEs measurements will be carried out monthly through skin autofluorescence
Measurement of endothelial cells metabolism24 months. Blood samples will be drawn at Time 0 (on starting the study when the patients starts HDF treatment), after 1 month, after 3 months, after 6 months, after 12 months, and after 24 months (study end)The patients' sera will be incubated with Human Coronary Artery Endothelial Cells (HCAECs), a human cell line isolated from normal coronary arteries. HCAECs are the ideal candidates for the study of endothelial cell functions and metabolism, proving an excellent model system to study all aspects of cardiovascular function and disease
Measurement of inflammatory cell activation24 months. Blood samples will be drawn at Time 0 (on starting the study when the patients starts HDF treatment), after 1 month, after 3 months, after 6 months, after 12 months, and after 24 months (study end)Measurement of lymphocyte subsets, monocyte activation and senescence, and apoptosis rate
Infection rate24 monthsThe number of infections that affected the patients and the rate of hospitalization for infections will be recorded
Cardiovascular diseases24 monthsThe number of cardiovascular disease that affected the patients and the rate of hospitalization for cardiovascular disease will be recorded
Measurement of inflammatory cytokines24 months. Blood samples will be drawn at Time 0 (on starting the study when the patients starts HDF treatment), after 1 month, after 3 months, after 6 months, after 12 months, and after 24 months (study end)measurement of interleukin 1 beta (IL-1 β), interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 10 (IL-10),interleukin 12 p 70 (IL-12 (p70)), interleukin 17 (IL -17), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interferon gamma (IFN-γ)

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactGaetano La Manna
gaetano.lamanna@unibo.it+390512144577

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026