Hypertension, Hypertensive Crisis, Hypertensive Emergency
Conditions
Keywords
checklist, emergency department
Brief summary
The investigators hypothesize that the implementation of a checklist in acute severe hypertension would result in improving short and long-term outcomes of patients with acute severe hypertension treated in the emergency department (ED). The investigators hypothesize that in the short-term, a checklist would improve the diagnosis and management of end-organ damage as well as reduce the length of stay of acute severe hypertensive patients in the ED. The investigators hypothesize that the checklist will result in better compliance with anti-hypertensive medications than without the checklist at six-month post-discharge.
Detailed description
Hypertension is a global public health issue and results in over 10 million deaths every year. The disease affects one-third of people living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and contributes to half of all productivity losses in LMICs due to non-communicable diseases. Though hypertension often presents as a chronic asymptomatic illness, hypertension-related emergencies represent a significant burden to the health care system. Acute severe hypertension \[i.e., systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 110 mmHg\] make up to 5% of all emergency admission. One-third of these patients present with end-organ damage; a condition called a hypertensive crisis. More worrisome is the fact that a number of ED visits, as a result, severe acute hypertension and hypertensive crises have almost tripled between 2006 and 2013 in the US. Treatment approaches to managing acute severe hypertension (\ 5% of ED patients) are largely unclear and only 6% of ED patients with acute severe hypertension receive appropriate work-up for the end-organ damage, indicating a huge care gap. One approach, which has been used successfully in managing other complex and critical conditions, is the use of checklists. Checklists are a listing of actions to be performed in a given clinical setting with the aim of improving adherence to standards, reducing errors and thus improving patient outcomes. The investigators hypothesize that the use of a Checklist, if appropriately implemented, can lead to an improvement in the care of patients presenting with hypertensive crisis. During this study, the investigators will measure the prevalence of acute severe hypertension and assess the current quality of care for these patients. This will be followed by the development of a checklist for the management of the hypertensive crises in the ED. The investigators will follow these patients to see the impact of the checklist on the quality of care and long-term outcomes.
Interventions
OTHERchecklist
The checklist will be implemented and healthcare providers use the checklist to manage the patients.
Sponsors
Aga Khan University
Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health
Johns Hopkins University
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Masking description
Participants will be masked. Investigators and care providers are not masked due to the obvious design and logistics challenges.
Intervention model description
This will be a before-after study. Baseline data capturing care and the outcomes of patients presenting with acute severe hypertension will be collected. A checklist will be developed and implemented and a post-implementation data collection will be conducted using the same tool as prior to the intervention.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Adults who visit the Aga Khan University Hospital Emergency Department with acute severe hypertension * able to provide consent to participate * Age \>25 years of age * Meeting the criteria of acute severe hypertension (SBP\>180 and DBP\>110).
Exclusion criteria
* Patients not providing consent or are unconscious are excluded from participation.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in frequency of diagnosis of hypertensive emergency | Baseline and 6 months after checklist implementation | The frequency of correct diagnosis of hypertensive emergency in patients with severe hypertension with evidence of end-organ damage in the ED before and after the implementation of the checklist. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the use of appropriate medications for treatment of hypertensive emergency | Baseline and 6 months after checklist implementation | We will measure the compliance with the hypertensive emergency treatment protocol before and after implementation of the checklist. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance with chronic treatment of hypertension as assessed through a phone call | Up to 6 months post discharge from the emergency department | We will follow up our patients on phone to assess their compliance with the use of antihypertensive medications. |
Countries
Pakistan
Outcome results
None listed