Skip to content

Concordance of Pelvic Organ Mobility Measurements Between the Finite Element Model and the Dynamic Pelvic Floor MRI in Patients Undergoing a Sacrospinofixation Surgery

Concordance of Pelvic Organ Mobility Measurements Between the Finite Element Model and the Dynamic Pelvic Floor MRI in Patients Undergoing a Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation Surgery

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04551859
Acronym
BiomécaRichter
Enrollment
41
Registered
2020-09-16
Start date
2020-10-31
Completion date
2021-11-30
Last updated
2020-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Apical Prolapse, Sacrospinofixation

Keywords

Sacrospinofixation, Prolapse, Richter, Vaginal vault, Sacrospinous ligament fixation

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of using a Finite Element model of pelvic organs by evaluating the concordance of pelvic organ mobility measurements performed by this mechanical model compared to the observations on the post-operative pelvic MRI in patients undergoing a sacrospinofixation surgery

Interventions

OTHERDynamic Pelvic Floor MRI

6 months after surgery, a Dynamic Pelvic Floor MRI is performed

Sponsors

University Hospital, Lille
CollaboratorOTHER
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women aged 18 to 80 * With at least a grade II apical prolapse according to the POP-Q classification * Treated with a sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSF) by the vaginal route

Exclusion criteria

* History of abdominal, pelvic, vaginal or vulvar surgery except hysterectomy * Association of another POP or urinary incontinence surgery (subvesical plication, levator myorrhaphy, plication of anterior rectal wall, perineorrhaphy ...) * MRI contraindication * Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity * Subject unlikely to cooperate with the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Concordance of mobility measurements of points C, Ba and Bp between the FE model and the dynamic MRI after SSF6 months after surgeryConcordance of mobility measurements of the 3 points C, Ba, Bp during the defecation sequence, between the Finite Elements (FE) model and the dynamic pelvic floor MRI after sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSF)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Concordance of mobility measurements of points Aa and Ap between the FE model and the dynamic MRI after SSF6 months after surgeryConcordance of mobility measurements of points Aa and Ap during the defecation sequence, between the Finite Elements (FE) model and the dynamic pelvic floor MRI after sacrospinous ligament fixation SSF)
Comparison of the pelvic organ mobility before and after surgery6 months after surgeryComparison of the mobility of the different points of the POP-Q classification (C, Ba, Bp, Aa, Ap) before and after surgery
Elasticity study of the vaginal tissue (Lille)after surgery (day 0)Elasticity study of the vaginal tissue removed during surgery (for patients operated in Lille only)
Concordance of mobility measurements between FE model enhanced by the vaginal tissue analysis and the dynamic MRI after SSF6 months after surgeryConcordance of mobility measurements of the POP-Q points (C, Ba, Bp, Aa, Ba) during the defecation sequence, between the Finite Elements (FE) model enhanced by the analysis of the vaginal tissue sampling and the dynamic pelvic floor MRI after sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSF)

Contacts

Primary ContactMarine Lallemant, Dr
mlallemant@chu-besancon.fr+33 3 81 21 94 38
Backup ContactMichel Cosson, Pr
michel.cosson@chru-lille.fr

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026