Skip to content

Comparison of Dimensional Changes After Tooth Extractions Between Xenograft and Allograft

A Pilot RCT Study Comparing Dimensional Alterations After Socket Grafting With Xenograft Versus Allograft

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04550689
Acronym
PilotXenAllo
Enrollment
12
Registered
2020-09-16
Start date
2020-10-01
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2023-11-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth Loss

Keywords

dental, socket grafting, bone graft, alveolar, xenograft, allograft, implant, ridge preservation, CBCT

Brief summary

To compare dimensional changes in extraction socket of single rooted teeth, 6 months post extraction, when grafted with xenograft versus allograft.

Detailed description

AIM To compare dimensional changes in extraction socket of single rooted teeth, 6 months post extraction, when grafted with xenograft versus allograft. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE Horizontal and vertical dimensional changes of extraction sockets as evaluated in a CBCT scan immediately post extraction and 6 months post extraction when grafted with xenograft versus allograft. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE 1. Difference in horizontal dimensional changes in xenograft and allograft groups as measured intra-operatively after extraction and at re- entry 6 months post extraction. 2. Difference in vertical dimensional changes in xenograft and allograft groups as measured intra-operatively after extraction and at re- entry 6 months post extraction. 3. Difference in histologic analysis of bone biopsy cores taken in xenograft and allograft groups at 6 months re-entry from osteotomy site. Difference in newly regenerated supracrestal bone height and volume will be measured directly from the segmented images from MicroCT. NULL HYPOTHESIS There is no difference between the two groups for any of the parameters evaluated.

Interventions

DEVICEBone graft

Bone grafts produced by Straumann LLC

Sponsors

Institut Straumann AG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
UConn Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The participant, surgeon and assessors of the CBCT will be blinded to the treatment arm. The bone graft will be chosen at random from an envelope with a list generated by Sealed Envelope Ltd

Intervention model description

Parallel arm with subjects randomly receiving allograft or xenograft for ridge preservation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Males or females ≥ 21 years of age 2. Able to provide informed consent 3. Good general oral health (no active periodontal disease, absence of hopeless teeth, absence of active caries, absence of acute infections) 4. Single rooted non molar teeth needing extraction for miscellaneous reasons (since histological analysis is being done, it is essential to harvest bone core biopsies without inclusion of native bone16) 5. Presence of natural teeth adjacent to the tooth planned for extraction 6. Absence of acute signs of infection such as pus discharge, fistulous tract and / or abscess in relation to tooth being extracted 7. Dehiscence type defects of the sockets limited to 2/3rd length of the root

Exclusion criteria

Systemic conditions 1. Conditions and circumstances as evaluated by investigator that would prevent completion of study participation 2. Conditions requiring chronic routine use of antibiotics or steroids 3. History of leukocyte dysfunction or deficiencies, bleeding disorders, neoplastic disease requiring radiation or chemotherapy, metabolic bone disorder, uncontrolled endocrine disorders, HIV infections 4. Alcoholism or drug abuse and heavy smokers \>10 cigarettes a day 5. Simultaneous participation in other studies 6. Pregnancy - Patients pregnant before the start of the study or patients who become pregnant during the course of the study Local conditions 1. Untreated periodontitis, caries or presence of hopeless teeth (other than the one planned for extraction) 2. Multi rooted teeth 3. Irradiation therapy 4. Osseous lesions 5. Missing teeth adjacent to the tooth being extracted 6. Implant restorations adjacent to the tooth being extracted 7. Multiple socket walls missing following extraction or buccal dehiscence defect extending to the apex of the root

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Horizontal and vertical dimensional changes noted on Cone Beam Computed Tomography6 monthsDimensional changes measured from a Cone Beam Computed Tomography immediately post extraction and grafting and 6 months post extraction

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Horizontal dimensional changes measured intra-operatively using a Periodontal Probe6 monthsDimensional changes of the crest measured intra-operatively immediately post extraction and grafting and compared to 6 months post extraction. Measurements will be made using a periodontal probe from the Mid-buccal to the mid-palatal/mid-lingual aspect of the ridge using a surgical stent
Vertical dimensional changes measured intra-operatively using a periodontal probe and stent6 monthsDimensional changes of the crest measured intra-operatively immediately post extraction and grafting and compared to 6 months post extraction. Vertical measurements will be made using a periodontal probe and a patient specific stent. The probe will help measure changes in height of buccal and palatal / lingual plate at the center of the ridge.
Histologic analysis of bone biopsy cores6 monthsHistologic analysis of the bone biopsy cores taken from the xenograft or allograft grafted extraction sockets

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026