Skip to content

Analysis of the Influence of Desensitizing Treatments on the Pulp Inflammatory Response in Bleached Teeth

Effect of Different Desensitizing Protocols on the Pulp Inflammatory Response in Bleached Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04548674
Enrollment
18
Registered
2020-09-14
Start date
2018-08-20
Completion date
2019-06-30
Last updated
2020-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulp Inflammation

Keywords

Therapies, Caspase 3, Immunohistochemistry

Brief summary

This randomized, controlled, blinded clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of different desensitizing protocols in preventing pulp inflammation after bleaching treatment with 35% hydrogen peroxide (PH) (Whiteness PH 35%).

Detailed description

Thirty healthy third human molars extracted by orthodontic indication were randomized and allocated into five groups (n = 6): CN (negative control): without intervention; CP (Positive control): PH; PMB: PH + photobiomodulation with low power laser; CPP: PH + casein phosphopeptide phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACPF); NANO: PH + nanohydroxyapatite. The office whitening was performed in two sessions with a single application of 45 min and an interval of 48 hours between them. Pulp tissues were removed for immunohistochemical analysis. Immunostaining was performed for Caspase 3 using an Axio Scope.A1 microscope.

Interventions

Single application of 45 minutes on the buccal surfaces of third molars, with an average thickness of 1 mm

DEVICEWhiteness HP 35% + LASER

A dose of LASER (60 J / cm2, for 16 seconds) was applied at two points, one point in the cervical region and another in the center of the buccal surface of the third molars, using visible infrared LASER therapy (Photon III / DMC, São Carlos, SP, Brazil), with a wavelength of 808 nm, and AsGaAl, as an active medium.

OTHERWhiteness HP 35% + CPP

Topical application of casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride CPP-ACPF (My Paste Plus, Recaldent, GC, USA) with the aid of a microbrush (KG Sorensen, SP, Brazil) in a passive way for 5 minutes.

OTHERWhiteness HP 35% + NANO

A topical application of nanohydroxyapatite (Nano P FGM, SC, Brazil) was performed with the aid of a microbrush (KG Sorensen, SP, Brazil) in a passive way for 5 minutes after teeth whitening.

Sponsors

Universidade Federal do Para
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 26 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Lower third molars class I position A * Maxillary third molars horizontal position A * Absence of caries and enamel fracture * Absence of periodontal disease * Extraction of third molars for orthodontic reasons * No allergy to the anesthetic and positive pulp sensitivity test

Exclusion criteria

* Calcification in the middle third of the root * Drug users or smokers * Patients who have already done whitening * Root apex with incomplete formation and patients with systemic problems that would make surgery impossible

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pulp inflammation3 days After extraction of third molarsEvaluation of pulp inflammation through immunohistochemistry of the third molar whitening or not

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026