Skip to content

Mental Practice on Balance

Effects of Motor Imagery and Action Observation on Static and Dynamic Balance: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04548336
Enrollment
45
Registered
2020-09-14
Start date
2020-11-01
Completion date
2021-06-30
Last updated
2020-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Movement, Involuntary

Keywords

Motor imagery

Brief summary

The main objective of this research is to see the effect of two mental practice techniques on static and dynamic balance.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMotor Imagery

Motor imagery group will have to imagine motor gestures of static and dynamic balance

BEHAVIORALAction observation

Action observation group will have to observe static and dynamic equilibrium motor gestures

BEHAVIORALPlacebo group

This group will watch a video of nature without a human component.

Sponsors

Centro Universitario La Salle
CollaboratorOTHER
Universidad Autonoma de Madrid
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 60 * Healthy and with no pain subjects

Exclusion criteria

* Any cognitive impairment that hindered viewing of audiovisual material. * Difficulty understanding or communicating. * Presence of systemic pathology, Central Nervous System or rheumatic disease. * Inadequate understanding of the Spanish language to follow instructions for measuring and treatment. * Collaboration of pregnant women. * Underage subjects * Subjects with pain at the time of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PosturographyChange in immediately at the end of the intervention.The device is a robotic device that evaluates motor function and consists of wirelessly sensed electromechanical platforms. This allows the evaluation of static and dynamic balance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual and Kinesthetic Motor Imagery AbilityImmediately before the interventionThe degree of physical activity was objectified through the The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) questionnaire, which allows the subjects to be divided into three groups according to their level of activity, which can be high, moderate, and low or inactive. The IPAQ consists of 7 questions about the frequency, duration and intensity of activity (moderate and intense) performed in the last seven days, as well as walking and sitting time on a workday. The IPAQ scoring protocol assigns the following MET values to walking, moderate, and vigorous intensity activity: 3.3 METs, 4.0 METs, and 8.0 METs, respectively.
The degree of physical activityImmediately before the interventionThe degree of physical activity was objectified through the The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) questionnaire, which allows the subjects to be divided into three groups according to their level of activity, which can be high, moderate, and low or inactive. The IPAQ consists of 7 questions about the frequency, duration and intensity of activity (moderate and intense) performed in the last seven days, as well as walking and sitting time on a workday. The IPAQ scoring protocol assigns the following MET values to walking, moderate, and vigorous intensity activity: 3.3 METs, 4.0 METs, and 8.0 METs, respectively.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactRoy A La Tocuhe, physiotherapist PhD
roylatouche@lasallecampus.es917401980

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026