Bone Resorption
Conditions
Brief summary
comparing bony changes around implants that will be joined by ametal framework either with electric weiling or with the conventional casting metal
Detailed description
joining multiple implants together in the edentulous arches is considered agood solution, using the conventional casting technique has many disadvantages due to lab errors and time and cost consuming on ,the other hand the study aims to owercome these disadvantages using electric welding metal framework.
Interventions
DEVICEelectric intraoral weilding
weilding metal framework to the implants in completely edentulous maxilla using electric weilding device intraorally
DEVICEcasting
casting metal framework
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Age range from 30 to 65 years old. * Absence of any medical disorder that could complicate the Surgical phase or affect osseointegration. * The patients must be completely edentulous. * The patient must have enough bone height for implants minimum length of 10mm and a minimum diameter of 5 mm. * Patients with good oral hygiene. * Complete denture wearer. * Adequate inter arch space for screw retained prosthesis. * Absence of any intra-oral pathological condition.
Exclusion criteria
Patients with recent extraction(less than three months). * Patients with inflamed ridge or candida infection. * Patients with flappyridge. * Parafunctional habits.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| bony changes assessment | 12 months | assessment of bone height changes around implants using digital periapical paralling imaging technique and the unit will be meagured in mm. |
Countries
Egypt
Contacts
Primary Contactfaculty of dentistry cairo university
Outcome results
None listed