Wound Heal
Conditions
Keywords
Mohs surgery, Manuka honey, Secondary intention wound healing
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to elucidate if a novel biomaterial containing gelatin, manuka honey, and hydroxyapatite enhances secondary intention healing when compared to conventional secondary intention healing for surgical defects after Mohs micrographic surgery on the head and distal lower extremities (below the knee). This novel biomaterial has already been FDA cleared for surgical wounds.
Detailed description
Secondary intention healing (SIH) is often underutilized and has several advantages compared to primary surgical repair. Wound care is minimal, bleeding and infection are rare, and risks associated with primary closure (e.g. hematoma, suture granuloma, graft or flap failure) are non-existent. Importantly, SIH facilitates surveillance of tumor recurrence, whereas flaps and grafts may bury residual tumor. When used in appropriate anatomical locations, SIH leads to high patient satisfaction. However, SIH requires regular wound care that can be cumbersome to patients. Prior studies utilizing biologic dressings have shown patients report better quality of life during the post-operative period related to less pain, decreased dressing changes, and faster healing times. Biologic dressings provide an alternative to surgical autografts and eliminate the risks associated with graft harvesting (e.g. pain, infection, and scarring). For many patients, the cosmetic outcome following healing is important. However, cosmetic outcome with SIH is variable and depends on many factors, namely location (e.g. concavities favorable), skin laxity, and underlying musculature. Exuberant granulation tissue, hypopigmented and telangiectatic scars are the most frequent adverse cosmetic outcomes with SIH. The novel biomaterial APIS® (SweetBio, Inc. Memphis, TN) is an advanced synthesis of gelatin, manuka honey, and hydroxyapatite bioengineered to protect wounds, manage exudate, and maintain a moist environment. It is FDA cleared (FDA number K1827250) for wound management across 9 indications including surgical wounds. It has been used successfully in a small case series of 8 patients for post-operative Mohs surgical wounds on the head and distal lower extremities. Time to complete re-epithelialization was 6 weeks (42 days), suggesting a reduction in healing time compared to standard SIH times for the leg and head of 127 and 57 days, respectively. Use of this novel biomaterial to enhance SIH is hypothesized to reduce healing times when compared to standard SIH wound care. This provides a useful option to aid SIH in sites like the lower legs, where healing can be prolonged due to intrinsic factors (e.g., cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes) or extrinsic factors (e.g., increased risk of surgical site infection following dermatologic surgery at sites below the knee). Randomized, comparative studies evaluating augmented SIH compared to conventional SIH in dermatologic surgery are limited. This study aims to evaluate whether use of a novel biomaterial enhances SIH, particularly in shortening time to complete re-epithelialization. Patients undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery amenable to SIH on the head and distal lower extremities will be randomized into one of four groups (standard SIH or biomaterial APIS® enhanced SIH on the head or distal lower extremities). Patients will have regularly scheduled follow-up with questionnaires at each visit. The investigators aim to evaluate whether use of this novel biomaterial decreases complete re-epithelialization times, reduces infection rates, and improves cosmetic outcomes.
Interventions
One layer of APIS® will be applied to the post-operative wound on the head covered by petrolatum impregnated gauze, a non-stick Telfa pad, gauze, and Opsite tape.
One layer of APIS® will be applied to the post-operative wound on the lower extremities covered by petrolatum impregnated gauze, a non-stick Telfa pad, gauze, and Opsite tape.
Participants in this group will receive standard secondary intention wound healing post-operative care on the Head. Post-operative wound will heal via conventional secondary intention. Application of petrolatum impregnated gauze, a non-stick Telfa pad, gauze, and Opsite tape.
Participants in this group will receive standard secondary intention wound healing post-operative care on the Lower Extremities. Post-operative wound will heal via conventional secondary intention. Application of petrolatum impregnated gauze, a non-stick Telfa pad, gauze, and Opsite tape.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* 18 years of age or older * Post-operative wounds following Mohs surgery on the head or distal lower extremities * Single Mohs post-operative defect * Post-operative wounds greater than 1cm in width * Depth of defect at least to subcutaneous tissue * Patients have the ability to provide their own wound care * Agreeable to regularly scheduled follow-up visits and transmission of photos via HIPAA compliant Vanderbilt University Medical Center Box * Patients are able to provide informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Under 18 years of age * Unable to provide informed consent * Unable to understand oral and written English * Post-operative wounds not appropriate for secondary intention healing * Sensitivity or allergy to APIS® biomaterial including collagen and its derivatives, porcine-derived materials or honey * Immunosuppressed and organ transplant patients * Post-operative wounds superficial to subcutaneous tissue
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Complete Wound Re-epithelialization on the Head | 14 days post-operative until complete re-epithelialization, approximately 5 months | Complete wound re-epithelialization is defined by epidermal regrowth covering entire post-operative defect. Patients will be seen in office 14 days post-operative, then every 14 days thereafter until complete re-epithelialization is achieved. Patients will also submit photos via Vanderbilt HIPAA compliant Box at regular follow-up intervals (post-operative day 7 then every 14 days thereafter until complete re-epithelialization is achieved). Time elapsed from surgery date to complete re-epithelialization will be noted in days. Time will be measured in days. Increased days indicates slower wound healing. |
| Time to Complete Wound Re-epithelialization on the Lower Extremities | 14 days post-operative until complete re-epithelialization, approximately 5 months | Complete wound re-epithelialization is defined by epidermal regrowth covering entire post-operative defect. Patients will be seen in office 14 days post-operative, then every 14 days thereafter until complete re-epithelialization is achieved. Patients will also submit photos via Vanderbilt HIPAA compliant Box at regular follow-up intervals (post-operative day 7 then every 14 days thereafter until complete re-epithelialization is achieved). Time elapsed from surgery date to complete re-epithelialization will be noted in days. Time will be measured in days. Increased days indicates slower wound healing. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Self Reported Pain Score | Baseline to complete wound re-epithelialization, approximately 5 months | Patients self-reported their surgical site/wound pain during each 2-week follow-up visit via a questionnaire. Scores were collected from participants until complete wound re-epithelialization, which was approximately 5 months for each participant. Pain scale will range from 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). These pain scores were then averaged amongst the participants included in each arm. |
| Number of Participants With at Least One Post-Operative Wound Infection | Baseline to complete re-epithelialization, approximately 5 months | Post-operative wounds will be assessed for infection at regularly scheduled follow-ups. Any clinically suspected infection (e.g. erythema, purulence, malodor) will be reported. |
| Number of Participants With at Least One Report of Post-operative Bleeding | Baseline to complete re-epithelialization, approximately 5 months | Patients will report any bleeding (yes/no) via questionnaires at regularly scheduled follow-up appointments. |
| Skin Thickness | Baseline to complete wound re-epithelialization, approximately 5 months | Participants were given a questionnaire at the final visit when complete wound re-epithelialization had been achieved (which was approximately 5 months for each participant) and asked, Is the thickness of the scar different from your normal skin at present? Participants reported on a scale of 1 (no, as normal skin) to 10 (yes, very different). These skin thickness scores were then averaged amongst the participants included in each arm. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were enrolled from 10/8/2020-1/27/2022 at Vanderbilt University Medical Center within the Department of Dermatology Mohs Surgical Unit.
Pre-assignment details
Thirty-seven participants were enrolled in total: 16 to the lower extremity group and 21 to the head group.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| APIS Biomaterial on the Head (Intervention Group) Participants received the experimental APIS biomaterial on the head. One layer of APIS biomaterial will be applied to the post-operative wound covered by petrolatum impregnated gauze, a non-stick Telfa pad, gauze, and Opsite tape. The biomaterial will be reapplied if it is completely absorbed at follow up and the wound depth below the epithelial level. | 11 |
| Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Head (Control Group) Participants in this group received standard secondary intention wound healing post-operative care on the head. Post-operative wound will heal via conventional secondary intention. Application of petrolatum impregnated gauze, a non-stick Telfa pad, gauze, and Opsite tape. | 10 |
| APIS Biomaterial on the Lower Extremities (Intervention Group) Participants received the experimental APIS biomaterial on the distal lower extremities. One layer of APIS biomaterial will be applied to the post-operative wound covered by petrolatum impregnated gauze, a non-stick Telfa pad, gauze, and Opsite tape. The biomaterial will be reapplied if it is completely absorbed at follow up and the wound depth below the epithelial level. | 8 |
| Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Lower Extremities (Control Group) Participants in this group received standard secondary intention wound healing post-operative care on the distal lower extremities. Post-operative wound will heal via conventional secondary intention. Application of petrolatum impregnated gauze, a non-stick Telfa pad, gauze, and Opsite tape. | 8 |
| Total | 37 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Head (Control Group) | APIS Biomaterial on the Lower Extremities (Intervention Group) | Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Lower Extremities (Control Group) | Total | APIS Biomaterial on the Head (Intervention Group) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 74.6 years | 67.7 years | 71.2 years | 70.6 years | 68.5 years |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | — | 0 Participants | — |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 10 Participants | 8 Participants | 8 Participants | 37 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 6 Participants | 5 Participants | 14 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 10 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 23 Participants | 8 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
Outcome results
Time to Complete Wound Re-epithelialization on the Head
Complete wound re-epithelialization is defined by epidermal regrowth covering entire post-operative defect. Patients will be seen in office 14 days post-operative, then every 14 days thereafter until complete re-epithelialization is achieved. Patients will also submit photos via Vanderbilt HIPAA compliant Box at regular follow-up intervals (post-operative day 7 then every 14 days thereafter until complete re-epithelialization is achieved). Time elapsed from surgery date to complete re-epithelialization will be noted in days. Time will be measured in days. Increased days indicates slower wound healing.
Time frame: 14 days post-operative until complete re-epithelialization, approximately 5 months
Population: Of the 21 randomized in the head group, 11 were randomized to the intervention group and 10 to the control group. One participant from the intervention group, and one participant from the control group were lost to follow up before complete re-epithelialization was achieved.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| APIS Biomaterial on Head (Intervention Group) | Time to Complete Wound Re-epithelialization on the Head | 41.6 days | Standard Deviation 14.7 |
| Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Head (Control Group) | Time to Complete Wound Re-epithelialization on the Head | 43 days | Standard Deviation 12.3 |
Time to Complete Wound Re-epithelialization on the Lower Extremities
Complete wound re-epithelialization is defined by epidermal regrowth covering entire post-operative defect. Patients will be seen in office 14 days post-operative, then every 14 days thereafter until complete re-epithelialization is achieved. Patients will also submit photos via Vanderbilt HIPAA compliant Box at regular follow-up intervals (post-operative day 7 then every 14 days thereafter until complete re-epithelialization is achieved). Time elapsed from surgery date to complete re-epithelialization will be noted in days. Time will be measured in days. Increased days indicates slower wound healing.
Time frame: 14 days post-operative until complete re-epithelialization, approximately 5 months
Population: Analysis of re-epithelialization of wounds of the lower extremities with standard secondary intention healing versus APIS biomaterial.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| APIS Biomaterial on Head (Intervention Group) | Time to Complete Wound Re-epithelialization on the Lower Extremities | 49.5 days | Standard Deviation 19.1 |
| Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Head (Control Group) | Time to Complete Wound Re-epithelialization on the Lower Extremities | 52.7 days | Standard Deviation 20.1 |
Number of Participants With at Least One Post-Operative Wound Infection
Post-operative wounds will be assessed for infection at regularly scheduled follow-ups. Any clinically suspected infection (e.g. erythema, purulence, malodor) will be reported.
Time frame: Baseline to complete re-epithelialization, approximately 5 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| APIS Biomaterial on Head (Intervention Group) | Number of Participants With at Least One Post-Operative Wound Infection | 0 Participants |
| Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Head (Control Group) | Number of Participants With at Least One Post-Operative Wound Infection | 0 Participants |
| APIS Biomaterial on the Lower Extremities (Intervention Group) | Number of Participants With at Least One Post-Operative Wound Infection | 0 Participants |
| Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Lower Extremities (Control Group) | Number of Participants With at Least One Post-Operative Wound Infection | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With at Least One Report of Post-operative Bleeding
Patients will report any bleeding (yes/no) via questionnaires at regularly scheduled follow-up appointments.
Time frame: Baseline to complete re-epithelialization, approximately 5 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| APIS Biomaterial on Head (Intervention Group) | Number of Participants With at Least One Report of Post-operative Bleeding | 1 Participants |
| Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Head (Control Group) | Number of Participants With at Least One Report of Post-operative Bleeding | 2 Participants |
| APIS Biomaterial on the Lower Extremities (Intervention Group) | Number of Participants With at Least One Report of Post-operative Bleeding | 0 Participants |
| Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Lower Extremities (Control Group) | Number of Participants With at Least One Report of Post-operative Bleeding | 0 Participants |
Patient Self Reported Pain Score
Patients self-reported their surgical site/wound pain during each 2-week follow-up visit via a questionnaire. Scores were collected from participants until complete wound re-epithelialization, which was approximately 5 months for each participant. Pain scale will range from 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). These pain scores were then averaged amongst the participants included in each arm.
Time frame: Baseline to complete wound re-epithelialization, approximately 5 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| APIS Biomaterial on Head (Intervention Group) | Patient Self Reported Pain Score | 1.25 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Head (Control Group) | Patient Self Reported Pain Score | 2.62 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.41 |
| APIS Biomaterial on the Lower Extremities (Intervention Group) | Patient Self Reported Pain Score | 1.14 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
| Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Lower Extremities (Control Group) | Patient Self Reported Pain Score | 1.29 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
Skin Thickness
Participants were given a questionnaire at the final visit when complete wound re-epithelialization had been achieved (which was approximately 5 months for each participant) and asked, Is the thickness of the scar different from your normal skin at present? Participants reported on a scale of 1 (no, as normal skin) to 10 (yes, very different). These skin thickness scores were then averaged amongst the participants included in each arm.
Time frame: Baseline to complete wound re-epithelialization, approximately 5 months
Population: Two patients in the intervention group for the head, 2 patients in control group for the head, 1 patient in intervention group for lower extremities and 1 patient in control group for lower extremities failed to complete a final questionnaire on scar assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| APIS Biomaterial on Head (Intervention Group) | Skin Thickness | 2.38 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.74 |
| Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Head (Control Group) | Skin Thickness | 6.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.77 |
| APIS Biomaterial on the Lower Extremities (Intervention Group) | Skin Thickness | 4.43 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.81 |
| Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Lower Extremities (Control Group) | Skin Thickness | 3.29 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.6 |