Skip to content

Enhanced Secondary Intention Healing vs. Standard Secondary Intention Healing in Mohs Surgical Defects on the Head and Distal Lower Extremities

Novel Biomaterial Containing Gelatin, Manuka Honey, and Hydroxyapatite Enhanced Secondary Intention Healing vs. Standard Secondary Intention Healing in Mohs Surgical Defects on the Head and Distal Lower Extremities - A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04545476
Enrollment
37
Registered
2020-09-11
Start date
2020-10-08
Completion date
2022-03-08
Last updated
2023-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Wound Heal

Keywords

Mohs surgery, Manuka honey, Secondary intention wound healing

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to elucidate if a novel biomaterial containing gelatin, manuka honey, and hydroxyapatite enhances secondary intention healing when compared to conventional secondary intention healing for surgical defects after Mohs micrographic surgery on the head and distal lower extremities (below the knee). This novel biomaterial has already been FDA cleared for surgical wounds.

Detailed description

Secondary intention healing (SIH) is often underutilized and has several advantages compared to primary surgical repair. Wound care is minimal, bleeding and infection are rare, and risks associated with primary closure (e.g. hematoma, suture granuloma, graft or flap failure) are non-existent. Importantly, SIH facilitates surveillance of tumor recurrence, whereas flaps and grafts may bury residual tumor. When used in appropriate anatomical locations, SIH leads to high patient satisfaction. However, SIH requires regular wound care that can be cumbersome to patients. Prior studies utilizing biologic dressings have shown patients report better quality of life during the post-operative period related to less pain, decreased dressing changes, and faster healing times. Biologic dressings provide an alternative to surgical autografts and eliminate the risks associated with graft harvesting (e.g. pain, infection, and scarring). For many patients, the cosmetic outcome following healing is important. However, cosmetic outcome with SIH is variable and depends on many factors, namely location (e.g. concavities favorable), skin laxity, and underlying musculature. Exuberant granulation tissue, hypopigmented and telangiectatic scars are the most frequent adverse cosmetic outcomes with SIH. The novel biomaterial APIS® (SweetBio, Inc. Memphis, TN) is an advanced synthesis of gelatin, manuka honey, and hydroxyapatite bioengineered to protect wounds, manage exudate, and maintain a moist environment. It is FDA cleared (FDA number K1827250) for wound management across 9 indications including surgical wounds. It has been used successfully in a small case series of 8 patients for post-operative Mohs surgical wounds on the head and distal lower extremities. Time to complete re-epithelialization was 6 weeks (42 days), suggesting a reduction in healing time compared to standard SIH times for the leg and head of 127 and 57 days, respectively. Use of this novel biomaterial to enhance SIH is hypothesized to reduce healing times when compared to standard SIH wound care. This provides a useful option to aid SIH in sites like the lower legs, where healing can be prolonged due to intrinsic factors (e.g., cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes) or extrinsic factors (e.g., increased risk of surgical site infection following dermatologic surgery at sites below the knee). Randomized, comparative studies evaluating augmented SIH compared to conventional SIH in dermatologic surgery are limited. This study aims to evaluate whether use of a novel biomaterial enhances SIH, particularly in shortening time to complete re-epithelialization. Patients undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery amenable to SIH on the head and distal lower extremities will be randomized into one of four groups (standard SIH or biomaterial APIS® enhanced SIH on the head or distal lower extremities). Patients will have regularly scheduled follow-up with questionnaires at each visit. The investigators aim to evaluate whether use of this novel biomaterial decreases complete re-epithelialization times, reduces infection rates, and improves cosmetic outcomes.

Interventions

DEVICEParticipants in this group will receive the experimental APIS Biomaterial on the Head.

One layer of APIS® will be applied to the post-operative wound on the head covered by petrolatum impregnated gauze, a non-stick Telfa pad, gauze, and Opsite tape.

DEVICEParticipants in this group will receive the experimental APIS Biomaterial on the Lower Extremities.

One layer of APIS® will be applied to the post-operative wound on the lower extremities covered by petrolatum impregnated gauze, a non-stick Telfa pad, gauze, and Opsite tape.

OTHERStandard Secondary Intention Healing on the Head

Participants in this group will receive standard secondary intention wound healing post-operative care on the Head. Post-operative wound will heal via conventional secondary intention. Application of petrolatum impregnated gauze, a non-stick Telfa pad, gauze, and Opsite tape.

OTHERStandard Secondary Intention Healing on the Lower Extremities

Participants in this group will receive standard secondary intention wound healing post-operative care on the Lower Extremities. Post-operative wound will heal via conventional secondary intention. Application of petrolatum impregnated gauze, a non-stick Telfa pad, gauze, and Opsite tape.

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older * Post-operative wounds following Mohs surgery on the head or distal lower extremities * Single Mohs post-operative defect * Post-operative wounds greater than 1cm in width * Depth of defect at least to subcutaneous tissue * Patients have the ability to provide their own wound care * Agreeable to regularly scheduled follow-up visits and transmission of photos via HIPAA compliant Vanderbilt University Medical Center Box * Patients are able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Under 18 years of age * Unable to provide informed consent * Unable to understand oral and written English * Post-operative wounds not appropriate for secondary intention healing * Sensitivity or allergy to APIS® biomaterial including collagen and its derivatives, porcine-derived materials or honey * Immunosuppressed and organ transplant patients * Post-operative wounds superficial to subcutaneous tissue

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Complete Wound Re-epithelialization on the Head14 days post-operative until complete re-epithelialization, approximately 5 monthsComplete wound re-epithelialization is defined by epidermal regrowth covering entire post-operative defect. Patients will be seen in office 14 days post-operative, then every 14 days thereafter until complete re-epithelialization is achieved. Patients will also submit photos via Vanderbilt HIPAA compliant Box at regular follow-up intervals (post-operative day 7 then every 14 days thereafter until complete re-epithelialization is achieved). Time elapsed from surgery date to complete re-epithelialization will be noted in days. Time will be measured in days. Increased days indicates slower wound healing.
Time to Complete Wound Re-epithelialization on the Lower Extremities14 days post-operative until complete re-epithelialization, approximately 5 monthsComplete wound re-epithelialization is defined by epidermal regrowth covering entire post-operative defect. Patients will be seen in office 14 days post-operative, then every 14 days thereafter until complete re-epithelialization is achieved. Patients will also submit photos via Vanderbilt HIPAA compliant Box at regular follow-up intervals (post-operative day 7 then every 14 days thereafter until complete re-epithelialization is achieved). Time elapsed from surgery date to complete re-epithelialization will be noted in days. Time will be measured in days. Increased days indicates slower wound healing.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Self Reported Pain ScoreBaseline to complete wound re-epithelialization, approximately 5 monthsPatients self-reported their surgical site/wound pain during each 2-week follow-up visit via a questionnaire. Scores were collected from participants until complete wound re-epithelialization, which was approximately 5 months for each participant. Pain scale will range from 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). These pain scores were then averaged amongst the participants included in each arm.
Number of Participants With at Least One Post-Operative Wound InfectionBaseline to complete re-epithelialization, approximately 5 monthsPost-operative wounds will be assessed for infection at regularly scheduled follow-ups. Any clinically suspected infection (e.g. erythema, purulence, malodor) will be reported.
Number of Participants With at Least One Report of Post-operative BleedingBaseline to complete re-epithelialization, approximately 5 monthsPatients will report any bleeding (yes/no) via questionnaires at regularly scheduled follow-up appointments.
Skin ThicknessBaseline to complete wound re-epithelialization, approximately 5 monthsParticipants were given a questionnaire at the final visit when complete wound re-epithelialization had been achieved (which was approximately 5 months for each participant) and asked, Is the thickness of the scar different from your normal skin at present? Participants reported on a scale of 1 (no, as normal skin) to 10 (yes, very different). These skin thickness scores were then averaged amongst the participants included in each arm.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled from 10/8/2020-1/27/2022 at Vanderbilt University Medical Center within the Department of Dermatology Mohs Surgical Unit.

Pre-assignment details

Thirty-seven participants were enrolled in total: 16 to the lower extremity group and 21 to the head group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
APIS Biomaterial on the Head (Intervention Group)
Participants received the experimental APIS biomaterial on the head. One layer of APIS biomaterial will be applied to the post-operative wound covered by petrolatum impregnated gauze, a non-stick Telfa pad, gauze, and Opsite tape. The biomaterial will be reapplied if it is completely absorbed at follow up and the wound depth below the epithelial level.
11
Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Head (Control Group)
Participants in this group received standard secondary intention wound healing post-operative care on the head. Post-operative wound will heal via conventional secondary intention. Application of petrolatum impregnated gauze, a non-stick Telfa pad, gauze, and Opsite tape.
10
APIS Biomaterial on the Lower Extremities (Intervention Group)
Participants received the experimental APIS biomaterial on the distal lower extremities. One layer of APIS biomaterial will be applied to the post-operative wound covered by petrolatum impregnated gauze, a non-stick Telfa pad, gauze, and Opsite tape. The biomaterial will be reapplied if it is completely absorbed at follow up and the wound depth below the epithelial level.
8
Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Lower Extremities (Control Group)
Participants in this group received standard secondary intention wound healing post-operative care on the distal lower extremities. Post-operative wound will heal via conventional secondary intention. Application of petrolatum impregnated gauze, a non-stick Telfa pad, gauze, and Opsite tape.
8
Total37

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard Secondary Intention Healing on the Head (Control Group)APIS Biomaterial on the Lower Extremities (Intervention Group)Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Lower Extremities (Control Group)TotalAPIS Biomaterial on the Head (Intervention Group)
Age, Continuous74.6 years67.7 years71.2 years70.6 years68.5 years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 Participants8 Participants8 Participants37 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants6 Participants5 Participants14 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants2 Participants3 Participants23 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Complete Wound Re-epithelialization on the Head

Complete wound re-epithelialization is defined by epidermal regrowth covering entire post-operative defect. Patients will be seen in office 14 days post-operative, then every 14 days thereafter until complete re-epithelialization is achieved. Patients will also submit photos via Vanderbilt HIPAA compliant Box at regular follow-up intervals (post-operative day 7 then every 14 days thereafter until complete re-epithelialization is achieved). Time elapsed from surgery date to complete re-epithelialization will be noted in days. Time will be measured in days. Increased days indicates slower wound healing.

Time frame: 14 days post-operative until complete re-epithelialization, approximately 5 months

Population: Of the 21 randomized in the head group, 11 were randomized to the intervention group and 10 to the control group. One participant from the intervention group, and one participant from the control group were lost to follow up before complete re-epithelialization was achieved.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
APIS Biomaterial on Head (Intervention Group)Time to Complete Wound Re-epithelialization on the Head41.6 daysStandard Deviation 14.7
Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Head (Control Group)Time to Complete Wound Re-epithelialization on the Head43 daysStandard Deviation 12.3
Primary

Time to Complete Wound Re-epithelialization on the Lower Extremities

Complete wound re-epithelialization is defined by epidermal regrowth covering entire post-operative defect. Patients will be seen in office 14 days post-operative, then every 14 days thereafter until complete re-epithelialization is achieved. Patients will also submit photos via Vanderbilt HIPAA compliant Box at regular follow-up intervals (post-operative day 7 then every 14 days thereafter until complete re-epithelialization is achieved). Time elapsed from surgery date to complete re-epithelialization will be noted in days. Time will be measured in days. Increased days indicates slower wound healing.

Time frame: 14 days post-operative until complete re-epithelialization, approximately 5 months

Population: Analysis of re-epithelialization of wounds of the lower extremities with standard secondary intention healing versus APIS biomaterial.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
APIS Biomaterial on Head (Intervention Group)Time to Complete Wound Re-epithelialization on the Lower Extremities49.5 daysStandard Deviation 19.1
Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Head (Control Group)Time to Complete Wound Re-epithelialization on the Lower Extremities52.7 daysStandard Deviation 20.1
Secondary

Number of Participants With at Least One Post-Operative Wound Infection

Post-operative wounds will be assessed for infection at regularly scheduled follow-ups. Any clinically suspected infection (e.g. erythema, purulence, malodor) will be reported.

Time frame: Baseline to complete re-epithelialization, approximately 5 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
APIS Biomaterial on Head (Intervention Group)Number of Participants With at Least One Post-Operative Wound Infection0 Participants
Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Head (Control Group)Number of Participants With at Least One Post-Operative Wound Infection0 Participants
APIS Biomaterial on the Lower Extremities (Intervention Group)Number of Participants With at Least One Post-Operative Wound Infection0 Participants
Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Lower Extremities (Control Group)Number of Participants With at Least One Post-Operative Wound Infection0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With at Least One Report of Post-operative Bleeding

Patients will report any bleeding (yes/no) via questionnaires at regularly scheduled follow-up appointments.

Time frame: Baseline to complete re-epithelialization, approximately 5 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
APIS Biomaterial on Head (Intervention Group)Number of Participants With at Least One Report of Post-operative Bleeding1 Participants
Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Head (Control Group)Number of Participants With at Least One Report of Post-operative Bleeding2 Participants
APIS Biomaterial on the Lower Extremities (Intervention Group)Number of Participants With at Least One Report of Post-operative Bleeding0 Participants
Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Lower Extremities (Control Group)Number of Participants With at Least One Report of Post-operative Bleeding0 Participants
Secondary

Patient Self Reported Pain Score

Patients self-reported their surgical site/wound pain during each 2-week follow-up visit via a questionnaire. Scores were collected from participants until complete wound re-epithelialization, which was approximately 5 months for each participant. Pain scale will range from 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). These pain scores were then averaged amongst the participants included in each arm.

Time frame: Baseline to complete wound re-epithelialization, approximately 5 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
APIS Biomaterial on Head (Intervention Group)Patient Self Reported Pain Score1.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Head (Control Group)Patient Self Reported Pain Score2.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41
APIS Biomaterial on the Lower Extremities (Intervention Group)Patient Self Reported Pain Score1.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Lower Extremities (Control Group)Patient Self Reported Pain Score1.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Secondary

Skin Thickness

Participants were given a questionnaire at the final visit when complete wound re-epithelialization had been achieved (which was approximately 5 months for each participant) and asked, Is the thickness of the scar different from your normal skin at present? Participants reported on a scale of 1 (no, as normal skin) to 10 (yes, very different). These skin thickness scores were then averaged amongst the participants included in each arm.

Time frame: Baseline to complete wound re-epithelialization, approximately 5 months

Population: Two patients in the intervention group for the head, 2 patients in control group for the head, 1 patient in intervention group for lower extremities and 1 patient in control group for lower extremities failed to complete a final questionnaire on scar assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
APIS Biomaterial on Head (Intervention Group)Skin Thickness2.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Head (Control Group)Skin Thickness6.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.77
APIS Biomaterial on the Lower Extremities (Intervention Group)Skin Thickness4.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.81
Standard Secondary Intention Healing on the Lower Extremities (Control Group)Skin Thickness3.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026