Healthy People
Conditions
Keywords
Neurofeedback, Electroencephalography (EEG), Alpha rhythm, Relaxation, Melomind device, Longitudinal analysis
Brief summary
This longitudinal study deals with the characterization of the electrophysiological and behavioral effects of alpha-based neurofeedback training on the brain networks involved in the relaxation process of healthy people.
Detailed description
Despite a growing number of studies dedicated to neurofeedback, the underlying cerebral mechanisms (plasticity phenomena underlying neurofeedback training or learning) are very poorly known. In most of the work on stress and anxiety reduction, the neural parameters on which neurofeedback is performed are low frequency waves like alpha waves. But the effects that an alpha-based neurofeedback has on these waves and more generally on the oscillatory behaviour of the networks involved after the neurofeedback sessions, are very little studied. Thus, the NEURORELAX study aims to clarify the effects on neurofeedback training at the (electro)physiological level (changes in brain responses in terms of frequency of oscillations, power and location of the cerebral sources of these activities) and/or behavioural level (relaxation and reduced susceptibility to anxiety). It will use the Melomind neurofeedback device as built by myBrain Technologies company, which will make it additionally possible to assess feasibility of neurofeedback training with this reduced mobile device comprising of 2 dry electrodes. For these purposes, the investigators will propose a series of auditory neurofeedback training sessions to the participants, accompanied by electrophysiological (EEG) and clinical measures. The level of relaxation of the subjects will be characterized by self-reported questionnaires and by electrophysiological signal measurement.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALAlpha-based neurofeedback
Twelve 21-minute sessions (minimum of 1 session and maximum of 3 sessions per week) of auditory alpha-based neurofeedback with the Melomind device developed by myBrain Technologies (France). Recording of felt relaxation, perceived stress level, anxiety level pre-post sessions. Electrophysiological: Recording of EEG signals on 32 electrodes every two sessions.
BEHAVIORALSham neurofeedback
Twelve 21-minute sessions (minimum of 1 session and maximum of 3 sessions per week) of an auditory sham neurofeedback with the Melomind device developed by myBrain Technologies (France). Sham feedback is based on the real feedback of the participants in the Experimental arm. Recording of felt relaxation, perceived stress level, anxiety level pre-post sessions. Electrophysiological: Recording of EEG signals on 32 electrodes every two sessions.
Sponsors
Sorbonne University
Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière
myBrain Technologies
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
All the persons who may interact with the participants and/or implied in the analyses.
Intervention model description
There are two groups : one receives the real neurofeedback task and the second receives a sham neurofeedback. This study is double-blind randomized.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Voluntary adult subjects, aged 18 to 60 * No known neurological history * Having an anxiety level higher than 35 on the STAI-YA scale * Insured under the French social security system * Signature of the informed consent * Absence of visual, hearing, sensory or motor deficits incompatible with participation in the study
Exclusion criteria
* recreational use of psychotropic drugs * ongoing anxiolytic / benzodiazepine treatment * current depressive episode and/or generalized anxiety troubles * person under guardianship, curatorship or safeguarding of justice or any other measure * administrative or judicial deprivation of rights or liberty * pregnant or breastfeeding * unable to give consent * person subject to a period of exclusion from further research
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in alpha frequency band power at the end of the 12 neurofeedback training sessions relative to the initial, pre-training, alpha power level. | From the 1st training session until the end of the 12th training session, the time frame of the assessment is 22 days minimum and 96 days maximum, with a minimum of 1 training session and a maximum of 3 training sessions per week. | Individual EEG power measures in alpha band (between 7 and 13 Hz), performed over several minutes at rest, pre- and post-training, on every session. |
| Change in alpha frequency band power at post-training relative to pre-training across every training session. | From the 1st training session until the end of the 12th training session, the time frame of the assessment is 22 days minimum and 96 days maximum, with a minimum of 1 training session and a maximum of 3 training sessions per week. | Individual EEG power measures in alpha band (between 7 and 13 Hz), performed over several minutes at rest, pre- and post-training, on every session. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in anxiety trait after the 12 neurofeedback training sessions relative to before the first training session. | Assessments are performed before the 1st training session (at day 1) and after the 12th training session (at day 22 up to 96, depending on the number of training sessions per week (1 minimum, 3 maximum)). | Anxiety trait level measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Trait evaluation, STAI-YA), before the 1st neurofeedback training session and after the last neurofeedback training session. |
| Change in affective state after the 12 neurofeedback training sessions relative to before the first training session. | Assessments are performed before the 1st training session (at day 1) and after the 12th training session (at day 22 up to 96, depending on the number of training sessions per week (1 minimum, 3 maximum)). | Affective state measured by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), before the 1st neurofeedback training session and after the last neurofeedback training session. |
| Change in stress level after the 12 neurofeedback training sessions relative to before the first training session. | Assessments are performed before the 1st training session (at day 1) and after the 12th training session (at day 22 up to 96, depending on the number of training sessions per week (1 minimum, 3 maximum)). | Subjective stress level measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), before the 1st neurofeedback training session and after the last neurofeedback training session. |
| Change in the EEG power spectrum at the end of the 12 neurofeedback training sessions relative to the initial, pre-training, EEG spectral content. | From the 1st training session until the end of the 12th training session, the time frame of the assessment is 22 days minimum and 96 days maximum, with a minimum of 1 training session and a maximum of 3 training sessions per week. | EEG signal measurement performed over several minutes at rest, pre- and post-training, on every session; EEG power spectrum analysis between 0.5 and 45 Hz. |
| Change in relaxation state at post-training relative to pre-training across every training session. | Assessments are performed before and after every training session; the estimated period of time of assessment is 22 days minimum and 96 days maximum, with a minimum of 1 training session and a maximum of 3 training sessions per week. | Subjective relaxation state measured by a visual analog scale before and after every training session. |
| Correlation between the changes in electrophysiological measurements and the changes in behavioral measures. | From the 1st training session until the 12th training session (minimum of 22 days and maximum of 96 days, with a minimum of 1 training session and a maximum of 3 training sessions per week). | Correlation between EEG power spectrum features and scores at behavioral questionnaires and scales, across training sessions. |
| Changes in EEG power spectrum during the training sessions from the 1st until the 12th sessions. | From the 1st training session until the 12th training session (minimum of 22 days and maximum of 96 days, with a minimum of 1 training session and a maximum of 3 training sessions per week). | EEG signal measured continuously during the 21 minutes of neurofeedback training, on every session; EEG power spectrum analysis between 0.5 and 45 Hz. |
| Changes in anxiety state at post-training relative to pre-training across every training session. | Assessments are performed before and after every training session; the estimated period of time of assessment is 22 days minimum and 96 days maximum, with a minimum of 1 training session and a maximum of 3 training sessions per week. | Anxiety state level measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (State evaluation, STAI-YB) before and after every training session. |
| Change in the EEG power spectrum at post-training relative to pre-training across every training session. | From the 1st training session until the end of the 12th training session, the time frame of the assessment is 22 days minimum and 96 days maximum, with a minimum of 1 training session and a maximum of 3 training sessions per week. | EEG signal measurement performed over several minutes at rest, pre- and post-training, on every session; EEG power spectrum analysis between 0.5 and 45 Hz. |
Countries
France
Contacts
Primary ContactPhilippe Fossati, Pr
Outcome results
None listed