Skip to content

My Health Day by Day (Mi Salud Dia a Dia)

Multilevel and Ecologically Grounded Assessments of Personality, Emotions and Self- Regulation as Determinants of Psychological and Physiological Adaptation in Latino Prostate Cancer Survivors Undergoing Stress Management Training

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04545021
Enrollment
200
Registered
2020-09-10
Start date
2019-10-11
Completion date
2024-08-01
Last updated
2024-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stress, Emotional

Keywords

Prostate Cancer Survivors, Cognitive Stress Management, Hispanic/Latino

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to is to evaluate how Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM) targets (e.g., anxiety reduction, cognitive reappraisal, coping, emotional expression, communication skills, social support) operate through Science of Behavior Change (SOBC) measures and influence dyadic adjustment and Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in Prostate Cancer (PC) survivors and spouses/partners, in addition to physiologic adaptation and symptom burden in PC survivors.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Miami
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Prostate Cancer Survivor 1. ≥18 years of age 2. Hispanic/Latino self- identification 3. Spanish speakers (including bilinguals who agree to participate in a Spanish intervention) 4. primary diagnosis of localized PC (T1-T3, N0, M0) 5. surgical or radiation treatment in the past 4-months 6. no history of non-skin cancer for the past 2 years 7. no psychiatric treatment or overt signs of severe psychopathology (e.g., psychosis, substance dependence) 8. owning a smartphone device with an Android or iPhone Operating System (iOS), which is necessary to collect the proposed Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) data or a valid email address. (I) willingness to wear the E4 wristband at 5 time points, over the course of 4 days (J) has a spouse/partner that is willing to participate or is willing to participate in the study alone Spouses/Partners: 1. female or male ≥18 years of age 2. have no history of inpatient psychiatric treatment for severe mental illness or overt signs of severe psychopathology (e.g., psychosis, substance dep., dementia) 3. willingness to be assessed and followed for 6 months 4. no life-threatening illness with a life expectancy \< 12 months 5. identifies as a spouse/partner and is willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Not meeting all of the inclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in emotion regulationBaseline to month 4, baseline to month 6Change in emotion regulation will be measured using the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ). ERQ is a 10-item questionnaire with a total score ranging from 0-70 with the higher score indicating greater use of emotional regulation strategy.
Change in self regulationBaseline to month 4, baseline to month 6Change in self-regulation will be measured using the Short Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SSRQ). The SSRQ is a 31-item self-report questionnaire with a total score ranging from 30-150 with the higher score indicating greater self-regulation.
Change in mindfulness attention awarenessBaseline to month 4, baseline to month 6Change in mindfulness attention awareness is measured using the Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). MAAS has 15 questions with a total score ranging from 15-90 with the higher score indicating higher levels of dispositional mindfulness
Change in couple coercionBaseline to month 4, baseline to month 6Change in couple coercion is measured using the Couple Coercion Questionnaire (CCQ). The CCQ is a 12 item questionnaire with the total score ranging from 12-72, with the higher score indicating increased perception of how coercion exemplifies his/her relationship with his/her partner.
Change in behavioral inhibitionBaseline to month 4, baseline to month 6Behavioral Inhibition is measured using the Behavioral Inhibition and Activation Scale (BIS/BAS). BIS/BAS scale is a 24-item questionnaire with the BIS composing of items 2, 8, 13, 16, 19, 22 and 24. The total score for BIS has a range of 7-28 with the higher score indicating increase avoidance of aversive outcomes.
Change in behavioral activationBaseline to month 4, baseline to month 6Behavioral Activation is measured using the Behavioral Inhibition and Activation Scale (BIS/BAS). BIS/BAS scale is a 24-item questionnaire with the BAS composing of a subset of questions with a total score ranging from of 13-52 with the higher score indicating increased motivation to approach goal-oriented outcomes.
Change in relationship satisfactionBaseline to month 4, baseline to month 6Changes in relationship satisfaction as assessed by the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS). RDAS is a 14-item measure with total scores ranging from 0-69 with the higher scores indicate greater relationship satisfaction.
Heart rate variabilityUp to Month 6Heart rate variability collected via the Empatica wrist watch
Electrodermal activityUp to Month 6Electrodermal activity collected via the Empatica wrist watch
Life satisfaction as measured by the Affective Balance Scale (ABS)Up to Month 6ABS is 10 item questionnaire with a total score ranging from 0-5, with the higher score indicating higher life satisfaction.
Measure of Current Status (MOCS)Up to Month 6The MOCS questionnaire has a total score ranging from 0-52 with the higher score indicating increased likelihood of having the ability to relax at will.
Level of stressUp to Month 6Level of stress will be measured using a Likert Scale question ranging from 1-4 with the higher value indicating greater stress.
Frequency of Text messagesMonth 6The frequency of text messages will be reported as total amount of text messages sent and received per month, collected via Short Messaging Service (SMS) extraction software.
Length of Text messagesMonth 6The length of text messages will be reported as average number of lines per text message collected via SMS extraction software

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026