Skip to content

Self-regulation of Prefrontal Cortex During Emotional Cognitive Control

Self-regulation of Prefrontal Cortex During Emotional Cognitive Control

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04543500
Acronym
SPrC
Enrollment
70
Registered
2020-09-10
Start date
2020-10-28
Completion date
2022-04-16
Last updated
2022-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cognitive Function, Healthy Volunteers

Brief summary

Deficits in emotional cognitive control are present in a number of clinical psychiatric populations including depression, anxiety, and PTSD. Deficits in this domain of function limit one's ability to focus attention on goal directed activities while inhibiting reactions to irrelevant emotional stimuli, and this contributes to the symptoms of these disorders and makes individuals less likely to be successful in existing treatments. The left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPFC) and its connectivity with other regions (i.e., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, insula, amygdala) is thought to play a central role in facilitating emotional cognitive control. However, past research has primarily utilized correlational approaches that limit conclusions about the directionality of these relationships. Enhancing our understanding of the neural underpinnings of emotional cognitive control could be valuable for informing treatment for populations with deficits in these processes. The current study utilizes a neuromodulatory approach called real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (rtfMRI-nf) whereby participants observe their own neural activity in the moment and are taught to self-regulate this activity. Healthy adult participants will be trained to increase neural activity in LDLPFC while involved in mental tasks involving emotional cognitive control processes. The mental tasks will include counting, remembering words, or planning events while viewing negatively-valenced emotional words (e.g., kill, death, threat). This study will use an experimental approach with participants being randomized to either LDLPFC rtfMRI-nf or control rtfMRI-nf where participants receive neural feedback from a region not involved with emotional cognitive control processes. Resting-state fMRI scans and behavioral testing sessions will take place before and after rtfMRI-nf. The specific aims are to examine the impact of LDLPFC rtfMRI-nf on: (1) LDLPFC activity during emotional cognitive control and (2) LDLPFC functional connectivity with other brain regions during rest. Additionally, this study will examine the neural correlates of emotional cognitive control independent of rtfMRI-nf. Thus, the final specific aim is to (3) Investigate relationships between individual differences in LDLPFC engagement, cognitive control performance, trauma history, and sleep quality. To facilitate the relevance of these findings to clinical populations, trauma exposure and sleep quality will be explored as moderators of neural change across time for those in the rtfMRI-nf group. To these ends, this study will use rtfMRI-nf to experimentally investigate the relationship between LDLPFC activity and emotional cognitive control as well as investigate these neural mechanisms independent of rtfMRI-nf. This research will improve our understanding of emotional cognitive control and demonstrate whether this is a modifiable target for intervention in populations with deficits in this domain of function.

Interventions

Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (rtfMRI-nf) is a procedure using an MRI scanner that allows participants to observe their own neural activity in the moment. They are taught to self-regulate this activity during a task.

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* able to provide informed consent * sufficient English proficiency to complete procedures * absence of any DSM-5 psychiatric disorder

Exclusion criteria

* meeting criteria for any DSM-5 psychiatric disorder * current prescription of psychiatric medication * history of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury * diagnosis of neurologic disorders * current alcohol/drug abuse * MRI contra-indications (e.g., metal in body) * uncorrected vision/hearing problems

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activity during emotional cognitive control (pre- to post-neurofeedback)Approximately 2 hours after baseline assessmentIndividual ability to regulate left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activity during an emotional cognitive control task will be assessed before and after neurofeedback for both active and sham conditions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex functional connectivity with other brain regions during rest (pre- to post-neurofeedback)Approximately 2 hours after baseline assessmentIndividual functional connectivity values between left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and other brain regions during rest will be assessed before and after neurofeedback for both active and sham conditions.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Flanker Task Average Reaction TimeApproximately 1 day after baseline assessment.Average reaction time on the incongruent condition of the Flanker task.
Emotional Stroop Reaction Time DifferenceApproximately 1 day after baseline assessment.Difference in reaction time for emotional versus neutral conditions of the emotional Stroop task.
Emotional Stroop Average Reaction TimeApproximately 1 day after baseline assessment.Average reaction time on the emotion condition of the emotional Stroop task.
Flanker task Reaction Time DifferenceApproximately 1 day after baseline assessment.Difference in reaction time for incongruent versus congruent conditions of the Flanker task.
Color Word Stroop Reaction Time DifferenceApproximately 1 day after baseline assessment.Difference in reaction time for inhibition versus reading conditions of the emotional Stroop task.
Color Word Stroop Average Reaction TimeApproximately 1 day after baseline assessment.Average reaction time on the inhibition condition of the color word Stroop task.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026