Skip to content

Usefulness of Biomarkers in the Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults (Biotraumap)

Usefulness of Biomarkers in the Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04543162
Acronym
Biotraumap
Enrollment
1025
Registered
2020-09-10
Start date
2019-10-02
Completion date
2024-08-28
Last updated
2024-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intracranial Injury, Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15, S100B, Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Brain biomarkers, Cerebral biomarkers, Intracranial lesions

Brief summary

The indication of cranial computed tomography (CCT) is difficult to define for patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). For mTBI patients with a medium risk of intracranial complications, CCT scans are indicated although 90% of them are normal. The interest of the S100B protein has been widely demonstrated in the management of mTBI in adults. Its serum concentration (for blood sampling drawn less than 3 hours after trauma) can accurately predict a normal CCT scan for mTBI patients with a medium risk of intracranial complications. That's why, serum assay of the S100B protein is routinely used in the Emergency Department of Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital for the treatment of patients with mTBI. The objective of the study is to optimize the management strategy for mTBI patients by blood testing of new brain biomarkers. These biomarkers are synthesized by brain cells and are released into the blood in case of intracranial lesions.

Detailed description

Other biomarkers of brain damage, involved in the pathophysiology of head trauma, are also known. These are, for example, GFAP (Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein), UCH-L1 (Ubiquitine Carboxy Terminal Hydrolase L1), NSE (Neurone Specific Enolase), Tau, SBDP (Spectrin Breakdown Products) or NFL (Neurofilament) protein. To date, the too limited number of studies doesn't enable the use of these biomarkers routinely. Therefore we will study the interest of these biomarkers in the management of adult patients' mTBI. We wish to set a collection of biological samples drawn from 1500 patients consulting for mTBI (with a medium risk of intracranial complications) at the Emergency Department of Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, and requiring an assay of the S100B protein. The study will take place over a period of 36 months at Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital. Patients cared for mTBI when they come to the Emergency Department will be recruited according to the inclusion criteria. In case of no opposition, when having their blood drawn, one more tube will be drawn per patient. Then, the obtained serum will be frozen at -80 ° C for the next assays of the cerebral biomarkers such as: GFAP, UCH-L1, NSE, Tau, SBDP, NFL, etc. A later 2-weeks' telephone call after the head trauma will be made by a member of the staff of the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female patient, major * Patient admitted to the Emergency Department for mTBI, with a medium risk of intracranial lesions according to the SFMU (French Emergency Medicine Society) criteria, for which an S100B protein assay is indicated: * GCS score of 15 with at least one associated risk factor: amnesia facts more than 30 minutes before the mTBI loss of consciousness, anti platelet aggregating agent * Time between mTBI and blood draw (for the S100B protein assay) less than 3 hours. * Patient covered by a Social Security scheme.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient classified in the high risk group of intracranial lesions according to SFMU criteria : * GCS score less than 15, 2 hours after the trauma * Focused neurological deficit * Post-traumatic convulsion * Suspicion of open fracture of the skull or embarrassment * Any sign of fracture of the base of the skull (hemotympanum, bilateral periorbital bruise, otorrhea or rhinorrhea of cerebrospinal fluid) * Treatment with anticoagulants * More than one episode of vomiting. * Patient classified in the group at low risk of intracranial lesions according to the SFMU criteria, presenting a GCS score of 15 without any criteria for moderate or high risk groups of intracranial lesions. * Patient consulting for moderate or severe head trauma (GCS score less than 13). * Refusal of the patient (signature of the opposition form).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic value of cerebral biomarkers NFLDay 0Evaluate the diagnostic value of cerebral biomarkers NFL (ng/L)
Diagnostic value of cerebral biomarkers UCH-L1Day 0Evaluate the diagnostic value of cerebral biomarkers UCH-L1 (ng/L)
Diagnostic value of cerebral biomarkers NSEDay 0Evaluate the diagnostic value of cerebral biomarkers NSE (µg/L)
Diagnostic value of cerebral biomarkers TauDay 0Evaluate the diagnostic value of cerebral biomarkers TAU (ng/L)
Diagnostic value of cerebral biomarkers SBDPDay 0Evaluate the diagnostic value of cerebral biomarkers SBDP (µg/L)
Diagnostic value of cerebral biomarkers GFAPDay 0Evaluate the diagnostic value of cerebral biomarkers GFAP (ng/L)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Risk factors (antiplatelet agent) on biomarker resultsDay 0Collect information from medical records and assess the impact on biomarker results from statistical tests
risk factors (loss of consciousness) on biomarker resultsDay 0Collect information from medical records and assess the impact on biomarker results from statistical tests
risk factors (amnesia) on biomarker resultsDay 0Collect information from medical records and assess the impact on biomarker results from statistical tests
Utility of serum biomarker measurement with respect to reduction of the cost of managementDay 0Calculate this cost reduction compared to the cost of a cerebral tomodensitometry

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026