Clinical Evaluation of Stability of Implants Placed in Partially Edentulous Maxilla With Poor Bone Quality Via New Reverse Drilling Technique Versus Osteotome Technique.

Clinical Evaluation of Stability of Implants Placed in Partially Edentulous Maxilla With Poor Bone Quality Via New Reverse Drilling Technique Versus Osteotome Technique: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT04541641

Enrollment

Registered

2020-09-09

Start date

2020-10-01

Completion date

2023-08-01

Last updated

2020-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Implant

Brief summary

The study will compare between osteotome technique and New Reverse Drilling Technique in the placement of dental implant in posterior maxilla , primary outcome will be Implant stability that will be measured by Periotest device . follow up for 6 month. secondary outcomes will be crestal bone loss , pain and swelling.

Interventions

PROCEDURENew Reverse Drilling technique

a new technique of dental implant drilling that promote osseodensification by rotating the drills anti-clockwise rather than clockwise to promote bone condensation rather than bone cutting

PROCEDUREosteotome technique

a technique for dental implant placement by using the osteotome to condense the bone and create an osteotome rather than cutting the bone

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

21 Years to 50 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Partially edentulous patients in the maxillary posterior region. 2. Systemically healthy patient. 3. Presence of proper inter-arch space for placement of the implant prosthetic part. 4. Sufficient bone height and width for implant placement (bone height ≥10mm and bone width ≥6mm). 5. Non-smoker. 6. Patients who are ≥ 20 years old. 7. Good oral hygiene. 8. Acceptance of a one year follow-up period. 9. Informed consent is provided by the patient.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with systemic conditions that may interfere with implant stability, 2. Patients with local pathological defects related to the area of interest. 3. Unmotivated, uncooperative patients with poor oral hygiene. 4. Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as alcoholism or parafunctional habits. 5. Inadequate inter-arch space for implant prosthetic part

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
implant stability	6 months	the stability of the dental implant when placed in the maxilla of the patient and it will be measured by periotest

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
crestal bone loss	6 monthz	amount of bone loss around the implant . measured in MM with CBVT radiograph

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026