Skip to content

Study to Explore the Efficacy and Safety of BIO89-100 (Pegozafermin) in Participants With Severe Hypertriglyceridemia

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Explore the Efficacy and Safety of BIO89-100 in Subjects With Severe Hypertriglyceridemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04541186
Enrollment
86
Registered
2020-09-09
Start date
2020-09-01
Completion date
2022-05-31
Last updated
2024-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Severe Hypertriglyceridemia

Keywords

Hypertriglyceridemia, Dyslipidemia, Lipid disorder, FGF21

Brief summary

This study is designed to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of different doses and dose regimens (once weekly \[QW\] or every 2 weeks \[Q2W\]), subcutaneous (SC) dosing of BIO89-100 (pegozafermin) compared to placebo in participants with severe hypertriglyceridemia (SHTG).

Interventions

Subcutaneous injection

DRUGPlacebo

Matching placebo

Sponsors

89bio, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female age ≥21 to ≤75 years. 2. Screening fasting triglyceride ≥500 milligrams (mg)/deciliters (dL) and ≤2000 mg/dL. 3. Willing to maintain current eating and exercise habits from time of signing the informed consent and for the duration of the study. 4. Participants could be taking statins and/or prescription fish oil as background therapy or not be taking any background therapy. 5. Magnetic resonance imaging - whole liver proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) of ≥6% for participants screened for the Fibrate Expansion cohort.

Exclusion criteria

1. Uncontrolled or newly diagnosed hypertension. 2. Body mass index \>45 kilograms (kg)/meters squared (m\^2). 3. Receiving niacin, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, or supplements that could lower lipid levels. 4. Type 1 diabetes mellitus. 5. Diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus \<6 months prior to screening. 6. History of malignancy within 5 years prior to screening. 7. Participants with known lipoprotein lipase impairment or deficiency (Fredrickson Type 1), apolipoprotein C-II deficiency, or familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (Fredrickson Type 3). 8. Clinically or otherwise documented cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease. 9. Weight change ≥5% in 3 months prior to first screening visit or weight change ≥5% during screening or planning to try to lose weight during conduct of study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Serum Triglyceride (TG)Baseline, Week 8

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B100 (ApoB), Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), and High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)Baseline, Week 8Least Squares Means were calculated using mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM).
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Very Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) and VLDL-TGBaseline, Week 8
Percent Change in Baseline to Week 8 in Fasting Plasma Glucose, Adiponectin, and Body WeightBaseline, Week 8Least Squares Mean was calculated using MMRM.
Number of Participants Who Achieved TG <500 mg/dL at Week 8Week 8
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)Baseline, Week 8
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)Baseline, Week 8Least Squares Mean was calculated using MMRM.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Liver Fat as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Whole Liver Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF)Baseline, Week 8Least Squares Mean was calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).

Countries

Czechia, Hungary, Poland, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

As per the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), since a low number of participants enrolled in the fibrate cohort (3 on placebo and 3 on active treatment \[pegozafermin\]), participants in the pegozafermin 27 mg QW fibrate cohort were combined with the pegozafermin 27 mg QW main cohort, forming a pooled pegozafermin 27 mg QW group for analyses. Similarly, the placebo participants in the fibrate cohort were combined with the main placebo group (pooled) for analyses.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pegozafermin 9 mg QW
Pegozafermin 9 mg QW was administered as a SC injection.
12
Pegozafermin 18 mg QW
Pegozafermin 18 mg QW was administered as an SC injection.
21
Pegozafermin 27 mg QW
Pegozafermin 27 mg QW was administered as an SC injection. The Main Study cohort and Fibrate Expansion cohort for pegozafermin 27 mg were pooled together due to low sample size in the expansion cohort.
18
Pegozafermin 36 mg Q2W
Pegozafermin 36 mg Q2W was administered as an SC injection.
16
Placebo
Matching placebo was injected at matching frequency per assigned cohort. Main Study cohort and Fibrate Expansion cohort for placebo were pooled together due to low sample size in the expansion cohort.
18
Total85

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Fibrate Expansion StudyOther than Specified00001
Main StudyAdverse Event00400
Main StudyCOVID-19-related Dose Interruption00001
Main StudyInvestigator Decision00110
Main StudyRandomized in Error Not Treated00100
Main StudyWithdrawal by Subject11000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPegozafermin 9 mg QWPegozafermin 18 mg QWPegozafermin 27 mg QWPegozafermin 36 mg Q2WPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous52.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.12
51.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.81
53.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.18
53.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.36
57.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
53.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.86
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants2 Participants4 Participants5 Participants3 Participants17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants19 Participants14 Participants11 Participants15 Participants68 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Unknown
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
11 Participants21 Participants18 Participants14 Participants17 Participants81 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants4 Participants5 Participants2 Participants6 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants17 Participants13 Participants14 Participants12 Participants64 Participants
Triglyceride (TG) Level
<750 mg/dL
9 Participants14 Participants12 Participants9 Participants13 Participants57 Participants
Triglyceride (TG) Level
≥750 mg/dL
3 Participants7 Participants6 Participants7 Participants5 Participants28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 210 / 180 / 160 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 1213 / 2113 / 187 / 169 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 211 / 180 / 160 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Serum Triglyceride (TG)

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: FAS: Participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline TG measurement not including EOS visit. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in the SAP, the sample size in each arm (by dose group) was insufficient (under powered) to effectively evaluate differences in efficacy by dose, therefore, efficacy analysis was performed using total pegozafermin and placebo groups.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PegozaferminPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Serum Triglyceride (TG)-57.33 percent change from Baseline
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Serum Triglyceride (TG)-11.85 percent change from Baseline
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-57.08, -30.31]van Elteren test
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Achieved TG <500 mg/dL at Week 8

Time frame: Week 8

Population: FAS: Participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline TG measurement not including EOS visit. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in the SAP, the sample size in each arm (by dose group) was insufficient (under powered) to effectively evaluate differences in efficacy by dose, therefore, efficacy analysis was performed using total pegozafermin and placebo groups.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PegozaferminNumber of Participants Who Achieved TG <500 mg/dL at Week 851 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Achieved TG <500 mg/dL at Week 85 Participants
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

Least Squares Mean was calculated using MMRM.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: FAS: Participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline TG measurement not including EOS visit. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in the SAP, the sample size in each arm (by dose group) was insufficient (under powered) to effectively evaluate differences in efficacy by dose, therefore, efficacy analysis was performed using total pegozafermin and placebo groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PegozaferminPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)ALT-4.28 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 4.549
PegozaferminPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)AST-11.50 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 3.341
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)ALT0.43 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 8.881
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)AST0.51 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 6.597
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: FAS: Participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline TG measurement not including EOS visit. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in the SAP, the sample size in each arm (by dose group) was insufficient (under powered) to effectively evaluate differences in efficacy by dose, therefore, efficacy analysis was performed using total pegozafermin and placebo groups.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PegozaferminPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)-21.43 percent change from Baseline
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)-1.10 percent change from Baseline
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Liver Fat as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Whole Liver Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF)

Least Squares Mean was calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: All participants in the FAS who had baseline and a follow-up MRI-PDFF assessment. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in the SAP, the sample size in each arm (by dose group) was insufficient (under powered) to effectively evaluate differences in efficacy by dose, therefore, efficacy analysis was performed using total pegozafermin and placebo groups.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PegozaferminPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Liver Fat as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Whole Liver Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF)-42.18 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 6.207
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Liver Fat as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Whole Liver Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF)-8.26 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 11.214
p-value: 0.012ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B100 (ApoB), Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), and High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)

Least Squares Means were calculated using mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: FAS: Participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline TG measurement not including EOS visit. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in the SAP, the sample size in each arm (by dose group) was insufficient (under powered) to effectively evaluate differences in efficacy by dose, therefore, efficacy analysis was performed using total pegozafermin and placebo groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PegozaferminPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B100 (ApoB), Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), and High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)Non-HDL-C-18.29 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 2.943
PegozaferminPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B100 (ApoB), Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), and High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)ApoB-10.51 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 2.238
PegozaferminPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B100 (ApoB), Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), and High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)LDL-C10.44 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 4.654
PegozaferminPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B100 (ApoB), Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), and High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)HDL-C24.65 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 3.752
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B100 (ApoB), Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), and High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)HDL-C9.67 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 7.045
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B100 (ApoB), Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), and High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)Non-HDL-C-0.57 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 5.586
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B100 (ApoB), Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), and High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)LDL-C8.72 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 9.018
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Apolipoprotein B100 (ApoB), Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), and High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)ApoB1.07 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 4.309
Comparison: MMRM analysis of non-HDL-C comparison between pegozafermin pooled versus placebo pooled group.p-value: 0.00795% CI: [-30.67, -5.07]MMRM
Comparison: MMRM analysis of ApoB comparison between pegozafermin pooled versus placebo pooled group.p-value: 0.01995% CI: [-21.48, -2.01]MMRM
Comparison: MMRM analysis of LDL-C comparison between pegozafermin pooled versus placebo pooled group.p-value: 0.8795% CI: [-19.21, 22.68]MMRM
Comparison: MMRM analysis of HDL-C comparison between pegozafermin pooled versus placebo pooled group.p-value: 0.06495% CI: [-0.89, 31.7]MMRM
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Very Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) and VLDL-TG

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: FAS: Participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline TG measurement not including EOS visit. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in the SAP, the sample size in each arm (by dose group) was insufficient (under powered) to effectively evaluate differences in efficacy by dose, therefore, efficacy analysis was performed using total pegozafermin and placebo groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PegozaferminPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Very Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) and VLDL-TGVLDL-C-47.96 percent change from Baseline
PegozaferminPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Very Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) and VLDL-TGVLDL-TG-58.50 percent change from Baseline
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Very Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) and VLDL-TGVLDL-C-0.41 percent change from Baseline
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Very Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) and VLDL-TGVLDL-TG-0.85 percent change from Baseline
Comparison: Nonparametric analysis of VLDL-C comparison between pegozafermin pooled versus placebo pooled group.p-value: 0.006van Elteren Test
Comparison: Nonparametric analysis of VLDL-TG comparison between pegozafermin pooled versus placebo pooled group.p-value: 0.002van Elteren test
Secondary

Percent Change in Baseline to Week 8 in Fasting Plasma Glucose, Adiponectin, and Body Weight

Least Squares Mean was calculated using MMRM.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: FAS: Participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline TG measurement not including EOS visit. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. As pre-specified in the SAP, the sample size in each arm (by dose group) was insufficient (under powered) to effectively evaluate differences in efficacy by dose, therefore, efficacy analysis was performed using total pegozafermin and placebo groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PegozaferminPercent Change in Baseline to Week 8 in Fasting Plasma Glucose, Adiponectin, and Body WeightFasting Plasma Glucose-3.90 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 2.681
PegozaferminPercent Change in Baseline to Week 8 in Fasting Plasma Glucose, Adiponectin, and Body WeightAdiponectin69.53 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 7.383
PegozaferminPercent Change in Baseline to Week 8 in Fasting Plasma Glucose, Adiponectin, and Body WeightBody Weight-0.15 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 0.339
PlaceboPercent Change in Baseline to Week 8 in Fasting Plasma Glucose, Adiponectin, and Body WeightFasting Plasma Glucose-2.67 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 5.23
PlaceboPercent Change in Baseline to Week 8 in Fasting Plasma Glucose, Adiponectin, and Body WeightAdiponectin5.70 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 14.556
PlaceboPercent Change in Baseline to Week 8 in Fasting Plasma Glucose, Adiponectin, and Body WeightBody Weight-0.14 percent change from BaselineStandard Error 0.654
Comparison: MMRM analysis of fasting plasma glucose comparison between pegozafermin pooled versus placebo pooled group.p-value: 0.809MMRM
Comparison: MMRM analysis of adiponectin comparison between pegozafermin pooled versus placebo pooled group.p-value: <0.001MMRM
Comparison: MMRM analysis of body weight comparison between pegozafermin pooled versus placebo pooled group.p-value: 0.973MMRM

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026