Skip to content

Evaluating a Mobile Self-management Application for Patients With COPD Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Evaluating the Feasibility of a Mobile Self-management Application for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04540562
Enrollment
39
Registered
2020-09-07
Start date
2018-11-22
Completion date
2020-04-25
Last updated
2020-09-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Keywords

mHealth, Self-management, Blended care

Brief summary

The objective of the study is to evaluate the effects of a mobile self-management app in clinical practice for recently discharged COPD patients on application use, self-management, anxiety and depression, expectations and experiences, patients' and health care professionals' satisfaction and hospital readmissions.

Detailed description

Usability testing techniques were used to receive feedback on a prototype of the app, before starting the feasibility study. Patients were recruited from a large teaching hospital. The COPD app provided patients with an 8 week self-management program. The application had three views: timeline, information page, and contact page. The start date was each patients' date of discharge. The timeline was classified in 8 weeks, and each week included the lung exacerbation plan, daily and extra medication, information and education and questionnaires. The first week also included a video of a pulmonologist explaining the purpose of the app and additional information about the functionalities of the COPD app. The timeline consisted of the lung exacerbation action plan, medication overview, weekly questionnaires and monitoring, and consultations (video consultation after 4 weeks and face-to-face consultation after 8 weeks).

Interventions

OTHERCOPD app

The COPD app consisted of an 8 week self-management program. The app had three views: timeline, information page, and contact page. The timeline was classified in 8 weeks, and each week included the lung exacerbation plan, daily and extra medication, information and education and questionnaires. The first week also included a video of a pulmonologist explaining the purpose of the app and additional information about the functionalities of the COPD app. A video consultation was planned after after 4 weeks and a face-to-face consultation after 8 weeks.

Sponsors

Rijnstate Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 18 Years * Diagnosed with COPD * Admissions to the hospital for exacerbation * Having (access to) a tablet or smartphone * Working internet connection * Proficiency in using a tablet or smartphone * Ability to read and understand the Dutch language * Signed informed consent * At least one hospitalization for COPD exacerbation in the year preceding the study (outcome was...)

Exclusion criteria

* No exacerbation of COPD * Comorbidities: cancer, severe cognitive or psychiatric comorbidities * No access to a tablet or smartpone

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Use (feasibility)Week 1 through week 20Use based on log data: number of times the app was used per week.
Overall satisfaction (feasibility)Week 20Overall satisfaction was rated on a scale varying from 1 (not satisfied) to 10 (very satisfied). Suggestion for improvement were assessed with an open question.
Satisfaction (feasibility)Week 8Questionnaires were used to assess satisfaction, information and user-friendliness of the app. The items were rated on a 7 point scale, varying from 1 (totally disagree) to 7 (totally agree). Overall satisfaction was rated on a scale from 1 (very unsatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied). Multiple response questions were used to assess if patients missed information in the app. Suggestions for improvement were asked using an open question. Yes/no questions were used to assess satisfaction with video consultation(s) (additional requested video consultations, problems and time saving).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ExpectationsBaselineExpectations with technology: using questions covering constructs of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. The items were rated on a 7 point scale varying from 1 (totally disagree) to 7 (totally agree).
Self-management - change over timeBaseline, week 8 and week 20Self-management using Partner in Health Scale. The items are rated on a 9-point Likert scale varying from 0 (low self-management) to 8 (high self-management).
Experiences with technologyWeek 8Experiences with technology: using questions covering constructs of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. The items were rated on a 7 point scale varying from 1 (totally disagree) to 7 (totally agree).
Anxiety - change over timeWeek 1 until week 8Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Seven items were rated on a 4 points Likert scale, varying from 0 (lowest anxiety level) to 3 (highest anxiety level).
Depression - change over timeWeek 1 and Week 8Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Seven items were rated on a 4 points Likert scale, varying from 0 (lowest depression level) to 3 (highest depression level).
Satisfaction nursesAfter intervention completion, up to 15 months.Questions to assess nurses' experiences with the application, satisfaction, time investment and integration in their work process. The items were rated on a 5 point scale, varying from 1 (totally disagree) to 5 (totally agree). Overall satisfaction was rated on a scale from 1 (not satisfied) to 10 (very satisfied).
Hospital readmissions30 daysHospital admissions for at least 24 hours. The number of hospital admissions was obtained from the Electronic Medical Record. This was compared with the readmission rate from the previous year, November 2017 until November 2018.
UseWeek 8Questions about use of the application: number of times and time in minutes (multiple choice question), use of the different functionalities and which functionality is most important (multiple response question), if patients experienced problems (yes/no), received help using the application (yes/no) and if people in their environment helped them using the app (yes/no).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
PartnerBaselineLiving together with a partner (yes/no question).
Internet use (duration)BaselineMultiple choice question, varying from less than six months to more than 3 years
Frequency internet useBaselineMultiple choice question, varying from every day to never.
Tablet/smartphone skillsBaselineQuestion with 5 point scale varying from 1 (very bad) to 5 (very good).
Help needed to use app on smartphone/tabletBaselineYes/no question. If yes: open question to answer who was asked for help.
EducationBaselineMultiple choice question.
AgeBaselineAge extracted from Electronic Medical Record.
ChildrenBaselineHaving children (yes/no question).

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026