Skip to content

Prediction of TEI Success in Sciatica

Prediction of Transforaminal Epidural Injection Success in Sciatica

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04540068
Acronym
POTEISS
Enrollment
388
Registered
2020-09-07
Start date
2020-11-15
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2025-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lumbar Disc Herniation, Lumbar Radiculopathy, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Keywords

Transforaminal Epidural Injection, Lumbar spine, Prospective cohort study, Prediction of success

Brief summary

Rationale: Treatment with transforaminal epidural injections is part of usual care in patients suffering from lumbar radiculopathy. However, not all patients experience a satisfactory result from this treatment and it is unclear what percentage of patients responds well and if any clinical or radiological factors exist that predict a positive response. Objectives: Primary: to develop a model based on demographic, clinical and radiological parameters for prediction of treatment success after TEI Secondary: to estimate the short-term efficacy of TEI in patients with LDH and spinal stenosis based on pain, functionality and perceived recovery scores, to determine the correlation between clinical and radiological baseline parameters and physical and psychological patient outcome measures, to determine the rate of additional injections and rate of surgery after treatment with TEI, to determine the short-term (cost)effectiveness of TEI on physical and psychological patient outcome measures, and to determine the rate of complications associated with TEI Study design: Prospective cohort study Study population: Patients that are scheduled for TEI as part of usual care suffering from a new episode of lumbar radiculopathy Main study parameters/endpoints: leg and back pain scores at baseline, 30 minutes, 2 and 6 weeks after treatment. ODI, HADS, Quality of Life and PCI at baseline, 2 and 6 weeks after treatment. Perceived recovery at 2 and 6 weeks after treatment. Usage of healthcare at baseline, 2 and 6 weeks after treatment.

Detailed description

Data collection schedule Baseline Weeks of follow-up 30 min. Day 4 Week 2 Week 6 Demographic data ✓ NRS leg pain ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ NRS back pain ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ODI ✓ ✓ ✓ HADS ✓ ✓ ✓ QoL VAS ✓ ✓ ✓ PCI ✓ ✓ ✓ Likert score ✓ ✓ Adjuvant therapy ✓ ✓ ✓ TEI data ✓ ✓

Interventions

Injections above L3 will contain 1,5 ml lidocaine 1% and 10 mg dexamethasone and injections at L3 or below will contain 1,5 ml lidocaine 2% and 40mg methylprednisolone acetate in accordance with current Dutch anesthesiologic guidelines for usual care.

Sponsors

Spaarne Gasthuis
CollaboratorOTHER
Eduard Verheijen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of unilateral lumbar radiculopathy secondary to LDH or one-level spinal stenosis * Diagnosis supported by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings * Scheduled appointment for TEI * Access to e-mail * Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of unilateral lumbar radiculopathy secondary to LDH or one-level spinal stenosis * Age under 18 years * Severe multisegmental spinal disease * Anatomical abnormalities that may complicate the procedure technically (e.g. severe scoliosis) * Active malignancy or infectious disease * Use of immunosuppressive drugs * Use of systemic corticosteroids in preceding 3 months * Previous treatment with TEI for current episode of lumbar radiculopathy * History of lower back surgery at the same lumbar level * Circumstances that prevent treatment with TEI (e.g. use of anticoagulants that cannot be temporarily discontinued, allergy against steroids or local anaesthetic) * Pregnancy * Major language barrier

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numerical Rating Scale Leg Pain2 weeksThe NRS score for leg pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numerical Rating Scale Back Pain30 minutes after treatmentThe NRS score for back pain
Oswestry Disability Index2 weeksThe ODI score for functionality
Global Perceived Effect2 weeksThe degree of patient satisfaction from experienced recovery on a Likert scale
Numerical Rating Scale Leg Pain30 minutes after treatmentThe NRS score for leg pain
Pain Coping Inventory2 weeksAssessment of the pain coping mechanisms of the patient
Visual Analogue Scale Quality of Life2 weeksThe VAS for assessment of Quality of Life
Use of pain medication and physical therapy2 weeksUse of pain medication and physical therapy
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale2 weeksThe HADS score for assessment of anxiety and depression

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactEduard JA Verheijen, MD
e.j.a.verheijen@lumc.nl+3171526746
Backup ContactCarmen LA Vleggeert-Lankamp, MD, PhD
c.l.a.vleggeert-lankamp@lumc.nl+31715262093

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026