IUD
Conditions
Brief summary
Given the current lack of satisfactory options for the management of IUD insertion pain, could the virtual reality headset be an innovative and effective tool? The objective is to compare the pain experienced during IUD insertion between a group of women wearing a virtual reality helmet and a group not wearing one. Observational, prospective, randomized, open-label, monocentric study.
Interventions
Use of a virtual reality helmet during IUD insertion
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Randomized
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Female adult * Who has benefited from contraceptive counseling * The choice of an IUD (hormonal or copper) * Having signed a written informed consent. * Affiliation to a social security scheme.
Exclusion criteria
* Pre-existing dizzying sensations * Severe facial wounds * History of epilepsy * Persons of full age subject to legal protection (safeguard of justice, curatorship, guardianship), persons deprived of liberty.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| NRS during IUD insertion | 20 minutes | The assessment criterion used is the written self-report numerical scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain, 10 = extremely painful) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stress level difference with virtual reality | 20 minutes | Difference of stress between experimental and control group using self-assessment anxiety scale specially designed for the study, where 0 = non stress and 10 = maximum of stress |
| Satisfaction level difference with virtual reality | 20 minutes | Difference of satisfaction between experimental and control group using self-assessment anxiety scale specially designed for the study, where 0 = not satisfied at all and 10 = totally satisfied |
Countries
France