Skip to content

Comparative Study Between CellFX and Electrodessication in Sebaceous Hyperplasia (SH) Lesions

A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Comparison IDE Study Between the Pulse Biosciences CellFX System and Electrodessication (Hyfrecator Electrosurgical) for the Treatment of Sebaceous Hyperplasia (SH) Lesions

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04539886
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-09-07
Start date
2020-09-28
Completion date
2021-11-18
Last updated
2024-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sebaceous Hyperplasia, Skin Abnormalities, Skin Lesion

Keywords

CellFX, Nano-Pulse Stimulation, NPS, Clearance

Brief summary

This study is designed as a multi-center, single-blinded, prospective, randomized, study to compare the safety and effectiveness of the CellFX System to the comparator group, Electrodessication for the treatment of SH lesions in healthy adult subjects.

Detailed description

This SH comparative study will evaluate safety and efficacy in a split face design using the CellFX System and pre-defined energy profile for all primary and secondary treatments based on Fitzpatrick Skin Types and tip size. The comparator group will be treated with the same standardized intralesional electrodesiccation procedure conducted by all participating clinical sites. Subjects with 4-10 qualifying SH lesions on the face except the scalp, nose and within the orbital region will be enrolled. Each subject will be evaluated by the blinded site investigator at 7-days, 30-days, and 60-days post-initial CellFX and Electrodessication treatments. At the 30-day follow-up visit, lesions will be evaluate using Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), for eligibility to receive an additional treatment. In case of a second treatment, the subject will be evaluated by the blinded site investigator at 30-days and 60-days post-retreatment. Photography of the study lesions will be captured along with the blinded site investigator assessments at all visits.

Interventions

CellFX System consists of a console combined with a handpiece and coupled with a sterile single patient-use treatment tip (1.5 x 1.5mm, 2.5 x 2.5mm, and 5.0 x 5.0mm)

DEVICEIntralesional Electrodesiccation

Hyfrecator electrosurgical unit with a non-insulated needle-shaped electrode

Sponsors

Pulse Biosciences, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The Principal Investigator will select a sub investigator to be the blinded investigator to classify healing characteristics and aesthetic appearance of each subject's selected lesions at baseline and treated lesions post treatment and at 7-days, 30-days, and 60-days following the last CellFX treatment or Electrodessication. This sub investigator will be blinded to the treatment assignment. The subject may not be blinded to the treatment assignment.

Intervention model description

Subjects will be randomized to receiving the two treatments in a split-face design with CellFX being used on only one side of the face and Electrodessication on the other side. The randomization assignment will include the type of treatment and which side of the face.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is at least 21 and no older than 80 years of age. * Subject gives voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this clinical investigation and from whom consent has been obtained. * Subject must comply with study procedures including follow-up visits. * Subject is willing to have SH lesions treated in a single treatment session and understands that their lesion(s) may undergo a second treatment session at a subsequent visit. * Subject must have a minimum of four SH lesions and up to 10 SH lesions to be treated and the subject must have at least two SH lesions located on each side of the face. * For study purposes, the SH lesions must be no greater than 2 mm in height and must not exceed 5 mm x 5 mm at their largest dimension. The subject's lesions cannot be located within the eye orbit, nose, or scalp. * Subject consents to have photographs taken of the SH lesion(s). * Subject agrees to refrain from using all other lesion removal products or treatments (e.g. retinols, retinoids, and exfoliating products) to the treated SH lesions or any new SH lesions during the study period. * Subject agrees to refrain from prolonged sun exposure during the study period.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has an implantable electronic medical device.(i.e., pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator) * Subject has an active infection or history of infection in designated test area within 90 days prior to first treatment. * Subject is not willing or able to sign the Informed Consent. * Subject is known to be immune compromised. * Subject is prone to developing hypertrophic scars or to be a keloid producer. * Subject has allergies to Lidocaine or Lidocaine-like products. * Subject is employed by the sponsor, clinic site, or entity associated with the conduct of the study. * Have any condition or situation which, in the Investigator's opinion, puts the subject at significant risk, could confound the study results, or may interfere significantly with the subject's participation in the study. * Use of any other investigational drug, therapy, or device within the past 30 days of enrollment or concurrent participation in another research study. * Subject was previously treated with CellFX for SH lesions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Lesions With Improvement as Assessed With the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)60 days post last CellFX or Electrodessication treatment, up to a maximum of 3 months.Percentage of SH Lesions with Improvement as Assessed by Blinded Investigator During Live Assessments based on Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). The Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale ranges from 1=Very Much Improved or Excellent Corrective Result to 5=Worsened Appearance Compared with Original Condition. The primary effectiveness endpoint of improvement at 60-days post-last treatment as assessed live by the blinded site investigator using the 5-point GAIS
Percentage of Lesions With Hyperpigmentation, Hypopigmentation and Scarring as Assessed by Blinded Investigator During Live Assessments60 days post last CellFX or Electrodessication treatment, up to a maximum of 3 months.The first co-primary safety endpoint includes the percentage of lesions showing hyperpigmentation and scarring as assessed by the blinded Investigator at 60 days after the last treatment with CellFX or Electrodessication
Percentage of Lesions With Skin Textual Changes as Assessed by Blinded Investigator During Live Skin Assessment30 days post last CellFX or Electrodessication treatment, up to a maximum of 2 monthsThe second co-primary safety endpoint of skin textural changes including; flaking, erythema, crusting, scabbing, or other skin irregularities was assessed by the blinded site investigator at 30 days post last CellFX or Electrodessication treatment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, split-face design in a total of 60 participants with a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 10 SH lesions.

Pre-assignment details

Not applicable, since randomization occurred at the time of enrollment, defined as the time when intervention of the device occurred.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
All participants received prospective, randomized, single-blinded treatments using the CellFX System and Intralesional Electrodessication in a split-face study design. Participants were randomized to receive an initial treatment and a possible secondary treatment at 30 days with either the CellFX System on 1 side of the face and electrodessication on the other side. The CellFX System consists of an electrical pulse console (similar to devices used to electro-coagulate tissue) combined with a handpiece which is held by the clinician during application of pulses to the skin surface. The handpiece is coupled to a sterile, single patient-use non-insulated treatment tip. Once the electrical pulse console is turned on and a predetermined treatment energy setting is selected, a sequence of preprogrammed electrical pulses is administered to an area of skin directly beneath the treatment tip. The active comparator was electrodessication using the Hyfrecator electrosurgical unit with a non-insulated needle-shaped tip.
60
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Continuous55.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
56 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type Class
Class II
46 Participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type Class
Class III
14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
55 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 590 / 59
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 590 / 59
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 590 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Lesions With Hyperpigmentation, Hypopigmentation and Scarring as Assessed by Blinded Investigator During Live Assessments

The first co-primary safety endpoint includes the percentage of lesions showing hyperpigmentation and scarring as assessed by the blinded Investigator at 60 days after the last treatment with CellFX or Electrodessication

Time frame: 60 days post last CellFX or Electrodessication treatment, up to a maximum of 3 months.

Population: Subjects with 2.5mm lesions

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Participants Treated With CellFX SystemPercentage of Lesions With Hyperpigmentation, Hypopigmentation and Scarring as Assessed by Blinded Investigator During Live Assessments15.1 percentage of lesions
Participants Treated With Intralesional ElectrodessicationPercentage of Lesions With Hyperpigmentation, Hypopigmentation and Scarring as Assessed by Blinded Investigator During Live Assessments11.1 percentage of lesions
Primary

Percentage of Lesions With Improvement as Assessed With the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)

Percentage of SH Lesions with Improvement as Assessed by Blinded Investigator During Live Assessments based on Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). The Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale ranges from 1=Very Much Improved or Excellent Corrective Result to 5=Worsened Appearance Compared with Original Condition. The primary effectiveness endpoint of improvement at 60-days post-last treatment as assessed live by the blinded site investigator using the 5-point GAIS

Time frame: 60 days post last CellFX or Electrodessication treatment, up to a maximum of 3 months.

Population: 2.5mm SH lesions were assessed at 60-days post-last treatment of the lesion with either CellFX or Electrodessication by blinded Investigator during live assessments using Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). The Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale ranges from 1=Very Much Improved or Excellent Corrective Result to 5=Worsened Appearance Compared with Original Condition.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Participants Treated With CellFX SystemPercentage of Lesions With Improvement as Assessed With the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)76.2 percentage of lesions
Participants Treated With Intralesional ElectrodessicationPercentage of Lesions With Improvement as Assessed With the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)75.5 percentage of lesions
Primary

Percentage of Lesions With Skin Textual Changes as Assessed by Blinded Investigator During Live Skin Assessment

The second co-primary safety endpoint of skin textural changes including; flaking, erythema, crusting, scabbing, or other skin irregularities was assessed by the blinded site investigator at 30 days post last CellFX or Electrodessication treatment.

Time frame: 30 days post last CellFX or Electrodessication treatment, up to a maximum of 2 months

Population: Subjects with 2.5mm lesions with Pre-specified safety margin (95% CIU\<15%)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Participants Treated With CellFX SystemPercentage of Lesions With Skin Textual Changes as Assessed by Blinded Investigator During Live Skin Assessment6.87 percentage of lesions
Participants Treated With Intralesional ElectrodessicationPercentage of Lesions With Skin Textual Changes as Assessed by Blinded Investigator During Live Skin Assessment10.2 percentage of lesions

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026