Skip to content

Multicentric Prospective Validation of a Universal Test to Quantify Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, Danaparoid and Fondaparinux Levels

Multicentric Prospective Validation of a Universal Test to Quantify Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, Danaparoid and Fondaparinux Levels

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04539301
Acronym
UniXa
Enrollment
2100
Registered
2020-09-04
Start date
2021-04-01
Completion date
2024-05-01
Last updated
2024-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anticoagulation, Atrial Fibrillation, Venous Thromboembolism

Keywords

Anticoagulants (MeSH), Blood Coagulation Tests (MeSH), Drug monitoring (MeSH), Factor Xa Inhibitors (MeSH), Heparin (MeSH)

Brief summary

Despite their usefulness in perioperative and acute care settings, factor-Xa inhibitors-specific assays are scarcely available, contrary to heparin anti-Xa assay. The investigators aimed at assessing whether the widely used heparin anti-Xa assay can quantify the apixaban, rivaroxaban, fondaparinux and danaparoid levels.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTEstimated anticoagulant level (conversion factor x anti-Xa activity)

Estimated anticoagulant level (conversion factor x anti-Xa activity)

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: * Blood sample from adult patients treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban or danaparoid or fondaparinux

Exclusion criteria

: * Patients treated with unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Agreement between measured and estimated levels of each factor-Xa inhibitor2 yearsAn estimated anticoagulant level between 80 and 120% of the value obtained by the reference method (specific assay) will be deemed clinically acceptable, i.e. the patient's management would have been the same.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluation of the performance of the estimated anticoagulant level method by an inter-laboratory comparison program2 years
Cost comparison (estimated anticoagulant level method versus specific dosage)2 years

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactElodie BOISSIER
elodie.boissier@chu-nantes.fr330240165465
Backup ContactAnnick COULON
bp-prom-regl@chu-nantes.fr330253482835

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026