Skip to content

Use Test: Dermowas Body Lotion pH 4 vs. pH 5.8

Use Test: Dermowas Body Lotion pH 4 vs. pH 5.8

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04538183
Enrollment
25
Registered
2020-09-04
Start date
2017-12-04
Completion date
2018-06-30
Last updated
2020-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Brief summary

The objective of the study was to examine whether normalizing of the pH by acidification through topical treatment helps to strengthen the skin barrier, to induce epidermal differentiation and to reduce inflammation in healthy individuals.

Detailed description

Previous studies have shown that an emollient adjusted to pH 4 has favorable effects to the skin of aged individuals. The objective of the study was to examine whether normalizing of the pH by acidification through topical treatment helps to strengthen the skin barrier, to induce epidermal differentiation and to reduce Inflammation. The effect of a cosmetic oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion adjusted to pH 4 in comparison to the same emulsion adjusted to pH 5.8 on the integrity of the skin barrier and the mechanical stability was examined in healthy volunteers from age 18 to 75 years.

Interventions

OTHERWO 5000

WO 5000

OTHERWO 5001

WO 5001

Sponsors

Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The test areas were 5 x 5 cm squares on both inner (volar) forearms. The areas were randomized and double-blinded (regarding the two test products). For randomization, the permutated orthogonal Latin square method was used on condition that both test areas are always contralateral.

Intervention model description

Exploratory, Randomized, Double-blind (regarding the two test products), Intra-individual comparison

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female volunteers (75 % women and 25 % men) * Aged 18 - 75 years * Healthy skin * Informed consent was given

Exclusion criteria

* Atopic diathesis, atopic dermatitis and other skin diseases with a disrupted skin barrier * Dermatitis and other skin diseases in the test site * Birthmarks, tattoos, scars and other abnormalities in the test site, which may influence the measurements * Women: pregnancy and breastfeeding * Known contact sensitization * Severe systemic diseases * Regular use of sauna and solarium * Intensive UV exposure * Topical use of drugs in the test site four weeks before and during the study * Systemic administration of anti-inflammatory, immune-modulating and antibiotic drugs * Previous participation in other studies within the last month before the study * Alcohol and drug misuse * Missing awareness and inability to follow the instructions of the study staff * Other reasons which according to the study leader speak against the participation in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of transepidermal water loss (TEWL)Change from day 1 (before application) to day 30Tewameter TM300, Courage & Khazaka, Köln
Change of skin hydrationChange from day 1 (before application) to day 30Corneometer CM 825, Courage & Khazaka, Köln
Change of erythemaChange from Day 1 to day 30 + 2 hours (after tape-stripping), measured over 3 timepoints (Day 1, day 30 and day 30 +2 hours (after tape stripping)Visible score adapted from Frosch and Kligman: 0 = no redness, 0.5 = very slight redness, 1 = slight patchy or diffuse redness, 2 = moderate even redness, 3 = profound redness
Change of pHChange from Baseline to day 31, measured over 5 time points (Day 1, day 30, day 30+3 hours, day 30+6 hours and day 31)pH-Meter 910, Courage & Khazaka, Köln
Tape-strippingDay 31Number of the tape-strips until a threefold increase in TEWL compared to unstripped baseline value is reached. (D-Squame® (DSQ), CuDerm Corporation, Dallas)
Corneocyte sizeDay 31After staining with Nile Red by immunofluorescence microscopy and digital imaging
Amount of the cytokine IL-1αDay 31Determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Amount of antimicrobial peptide hBD-2Day 31Determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026