Skip to content

Relationship of Patient-Specific Functional Scale With Shoulder Functions: A Prospective Study

Relationship of Patient-Specific Functional Scale With Shoulder Functions in Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Program Applied to Patients With Shoulder Problems

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04538118
Enrollment
36
Registered
2020-09-03
Start date
2019-01-05
Completion date
2019-05-25
Last updated
2020-09-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Disability Physical, Frozen Shoulder, Humeral Fractures, Pain, Shoulder, Rotator Cuff Tears, Shoulder Impingement

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to examine the relationship between the Patient- Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) and shoulder functions in the physiotherapy and rehabilitation program applied to patients with shoulder problems.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALShoulder disability

Shoulder disability was evaluated with Patient-specific functional scale, the disabilities of the shoulder, arm and hand questionnaire, and the upper extremity functional index. First assessment was applied when patients came to physical therapy clinic at first. Second assessment was repeated after 6 weeks.

DEVICEShoulder Range of Motion

Shoulder range of motion was evaluated with universal goniometer. First assessment was applied when patients came to physical therapy clinic at first. Second assessment was repeated after 6 weeks.

BEHAVIORALPain Intensity

Pain intensity was evaluated with Numeric Pain Rating Scale. First assessment was applied when patients came to physical therapy clinic at first. Second assessment was repeated after 6 weeks.

Sponsors

Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* having a shoulder pathology * being volunteer * having shoulder pain at least 3 months * being literate

Exclusion criteria

* having more than one upper extremity pathology * having an upper extremity pathology involving the neck and trunk * having a neurological finding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disability6 weeksDisability was evaluated with Patient-Specific Functional Scale.Patients nominate 3 to 5 activities that they are unable to do or having difficulty doing because of their injury or problem. These activities are rated on an 11-point scale, where 0 is unable to perform the activity and 10 is able to perform the activity at preinjury level.
Activity Limitation6 weeksActivity limitation was evaluated with The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand. Scale score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
Functional Disorder6 weeksDisability was evaluated with Upper-Extremity Functional Index.Twenty prescribed upper extremity activities are rated by patients according to a 5-point scale, where 0 is extreme difficulty or unable to perform the activity, and 4 is no difficulty. Higher scores mean better outcome scores.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Intensity6 weeksPain was evaluated with Numeric Pain Rating Scale. It requires the patient to rate their pain on a defined scale. 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
Range of Motion6 weeksShoulder range of motion was evaluated with universal goniometer

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026