Skip to content

Preoperative Fluoroscopy Guided Hip Articular Branch Blocks and Analgesic Outcomes Following Hip Arthroscopy

Preoperative Fluoroscopy Guided Hip Articular Branch Blocks and Analgesic Outcomes Following Hip Arthroscopy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04538105
Enrollment
0
Registered
2020-09-03
Start date
2021-05-01
Completion date
2022-10-01
Last updated
2021-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Analgesia, Pain, Acute, Surgery, Arthroscopic

Keywords

hip arthroscopy, articular branch block

Brief summary

Arthroscopic hip surgeries are increasingly being performed as both diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. These procedures are considerably painful, thus requiring the proper pain management techniques in order to provide patient satisfaction and sufficient pain control. Articular branch blocks have not been evaluated for their use in hip arthroscopy, but have potential advantages of blocking the sensory innervation of the entire hip joint, with minimal impact on motor innervation compared to alternative blocks. This current study aims to evaluate the efficacy of using preoperative fluoroscopic-guided blockade of articular branches of the femoral and obturator nerves for analgesic management of patients undergoing arthroscopy compared to a saline sham block. The utility of pre-operative hip articular branch block (ABB) prior to hip arthroscopy will provide superior pain management postoperatively compared to a saline sham block. We hypothesize that the ABB (Articular Branch Block) will reduce the area under the NRS pain scores by time curve (AUC) and decreased oral opioid milligram equivalent use in the first 24 hours post-operatively.

Interventions

OTHERControl

Saline Articular Nerve Branch Block

OTHERArticular Branch Block (ABB)

0.5% Bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 (Articular Branch Block)

Sponsors

Rush University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Presenting for Hip Arthroscopy (Diagnostic or Therapeutic) * Pre-operative Numeric Rating Score (NRS) for pain \<8 on a 0 to 10 scale where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain imaginable.

Exclusion criteria

* Allergies to any of the study medications * Anti-coagulation status (INR \> 1.1, PT or APTT \> 1.5 control) * History of Hip Arthroplasty * Infection of Hip * Evidence of tumor * Pregnancy * History of diabetes with HbA1c \> 10% * Prior history of Hip Articular Branch Blockade or Hip Articular Branch PRF Ablation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NRS Pain Scores (NRS)24 hours post-operativelyNumerical Rating Scale is a self-reported pain assessment, in which a patient indicates their current pain level experienced. Patients can rate their pain on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse pain imaginable). Higher scores indicated on this scale may indicate that a patient is experiencing higher pain intensities at that particular point in time. Whereas lower reported scores indicate that the patient is experiencing less intense or minimal pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The QOR-15 (Quality of Recovery)24 hours post-operativelyQuality of Recovery scores will be obtained 24 hours post-operatively. Scores are reported on an 11 point scale (0 to 10), where 0 = none of the time and 10 = all of the time. Higher scores indicated on the Quality of Recovery scale represent a better recovery outcome.
Analgesic medication use24 hours post-operatively

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026