Skip to content

Clinical Study of Chondro-Gide® for Large Chondral Lesions in the Knee

A ProSpective, MulticEnter, Concurrently Controlled Clinical Study of Chondro-Gide® ArticUlar Cartilage CoveR for the Treatment of Large Chondral Lesions in the KnEe (SECURE)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04537013
Acronym
SECURE
Enrollment
82
Registered
2020-09-03
Start date
2020-08-26
Completion date
2025-09-29
Last updated
2026-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cartilage Disease, Cartilage Injury, Knee Discomfort, Knee Injuries

Keywords

Microfracture, Cartilage, Knee

Brief summary

Multi-center, prospective, concurrently controlled, non-randomized, double-blind (patient and assessor). Treatment of large chondral lesions in the knee with microfracture plus the Chondro-Gide® ACC is non-inferior to treatment of small chondral lesions treated with microfracture alone.

Detailed description

The study evaluates the investigational treatment for treating large chondral lesions of the knee to the control treatment of microfracture alone for treating small lesions.Eligible patients with a large lesion will be treated with microfracture plus the Chondro-Gide® ACC and compared to patients with small lesions that are treated with microfracture alone. Outcome measures to be assessed include patient reported outcomes and freedom from certain adverse events.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMicrofracture

Debridement of cartilage followed by placement of small holes in the effected area to fill the debrided area with marrow and cells.

DEVICEMicrofracture plus placement of Chondro-Gide® ACC

Debridement of cartilage followed by placement of small holes in the effected area to fill the debrided area with marrow and cells, followed by affixing Chondro-Gide® with fibrin glue.

Sponsors

Geistlich Pharma AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Signed written informed consent 2. One symptomatic knee with cartilage defect on the medial femoral condyle, lateral femoral condyle, or trochlea, identified MRI or arthroscopy 3. Between 18 and 55 years of age 4. Subject is willing and able to comply with all study procedures, including visits, diagnostic procedures, and the rehabilitation protocol

Exclusion criteria

1. BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 2. Symptomatic contralateral knee 3. Diagnosis of radiographic osteoarthritis with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3 or more 4. Prior surgical treatment of the cartilage using microfracture, mosaicplasty, or autologous chondrocyte implantation (debridement and lavage are acceptable if the procedure was at least 3 months prior to enrollment) 5. Patella dysplasia 6. Chronic inflammatory arthritis or infectious arthritis 7. History of autoimmune disease or immunodeficiency 8. History of connective tissue disease 9. Intra-articular steroid use within the 3 months prior to enrollment 10. Other intra-articular injections (e.g. hyaluronic acid) within 3 months prior to enrollment 11. The patient is currently being treated with radiation, chemotherapy, immunosuppression or systemic steroid therapy with a dose equivalent to more than 5 mg prednisolone 12. Pregnancy or lack of adequate contraceptives if a female of child-bearing potential 13. Enrolled in another study, involved in the study (as a researcher/investigator/sponsor), or relative of someone directly involved in the study 14. Active infection of the index knee 15. Previous diagnosis of osteoporosis as diagnosed by DEXA, bone densitometry or CT scan 16. Any disorder or impairment that would interfere with evaluation of outcomes measures, such as neurological, degenerative muscular, psychiatric, or cognitive conditions 17. History or current substance or alcohol abuse as defined by the DSM-V 18. Any other medical condition that the investigator determines would interfere with the validity of the study 19. Known allergy to porcine collagen 20. Symptom duration greater than 36 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patients achieving composite clinical success (CCS) at 24 months follow-up, with CCS24 MonthsThe CCS is defined as a patient meeting all of the three following criteria: 1. Improvement in the Pain sub-scale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) between baseline to 24 months follow-up 2. Improvement in function, defined as an improvement in the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score between baseline to 24 months follow-up 3. Freedom from device- or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs) or secondary surgical intervention related to the device, procedure, or treated lesion

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome ScoreBaseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 monthsThe Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a knee-specific instrument, developed to assess the patients' opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS evaluates both short-term and long-term consequences of knee injury. Calculate the mean score of the individual items of each subscale and divide by 4 (the highest possible score for a single answer option). Traditionally in orthopedics, 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates extreme problems.
Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Score3 months, 24 monthsMagnetic Resonance Image (MRI) will be obtain during the course of the study at 3 months and 24 months. MOCART 2.0 scoring will occur by independent assessment using the MOCART score. The score is a 9-part and 29-item scoring system, also resulting in a final cartilage repair tissue score between 0 and 100 points; 0 points represent the worst imaginable score, 100 points represent the best imaginable score.
Patient satisfaction6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months1. Were you satisfied with the procedure? (Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neutral, Somewhat unsatisfied, Unsatisfied) 2. Would you have this procedure again if needed on the other knee? (Definitely yes, Probably yes, Not Sure, Probably Not, Definitely Not)
Tegner Activity Scale6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 monthsThe Tegner activity score is a one-item score that grades activity based on work and sports activities. Tegner activity level scale is a scale that aims to provide a standardized method of grading work and sporting activities. A scale of the highest level activity being 10 and the lowest being 0
Employment statusBaseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 monthsEmployment status will be collected as: Employed full-time, Employed part-time, Not employed due to knee problems, Not employed due to reasons other than knee problems.
EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D)Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 monthsThe EQ-5D measures as a descriptive system comprised of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.

Countries

Canada, Germany, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORFabiana Martinelli

Geistlich Pharma AG

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKevin Plancher, MD

Plancher Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026