Skip to content

Bobath and Vojta Therapy for DS

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Bobath Therapy and Vojta Technique in Babies With Down Syndrome Aged 0-24 Months: A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04536506
Enrollment
23
Registered
2020-09-02
Start date
2019-09-26
Completion date
2020-01-26
Last updated
2020-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Down Syndrome, Motor Performance, Bobath Therapy, Vojta Technique

Keywords

infant with Down Syndrome, Bobath therapy, Vojta technique

Brief summary

Different physiotherapy approaches and education programs are applied to minimize motor and mental impairment in children with Down syndrome (DS). The present study was conducted with the aim of comparing the effectiveness of two different physiotherapy approaches in babies with Down syndrome in the early period. A total of 23 babies with DS aged between 0-24 months were included in the study. Infants were randomly divided to two groups: Bobath therapy (BT) group included 12 infants (6 girls and 6 boys) and Vojta technique (VT) group included 11 infants (4 girls and 7 boys). The infants were applied a total of 12 sessions of physiotherapy (twice weekly during 6 weeks). Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) was used for comparison of motor development level before and after the therapy. Emotional status of the mothers was evaluated with Beck Depression Scale (BDS) and quality of life was evaluated with Nottigham Health Profile (NHP).

Interventions

OTHERVojta technique

Vojta group received the following three times weekly for 12 weeks: 1. Reflex crawling, 2. First stage of reflex turning, 3. Second stage of reflex turning. Stimuli (pressure and stretch) for 30-60 sec were given by using the main stimulus points and auxiliary stimulus points together.

Bobath group received 45 min of sessions three times weekly for 12 weeks. An individual program was scheduled for each case following pre-assessment. It was targeted to enable normal posture, facilitation of corrective balance and protective responses and development of normal movement patterns

Sponsors

Pamukkale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
0 Months to 24 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* being between 0 and 2 years * being diagnosed with DS

Exclusion criteria

* having an additional neuro-motor disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Alberta Infant Motor Scale12 weeksAlberta Infant Motor Scale is a tool which evaluates the infants from baby to independently walking children and measures delay in motor performance, enables families and clinicians to obtain data about motor performance of the infant, compares motor performance before and after therapy. The child is observed when performing spontaneous behaviors with a certain postural control. The scale measures weight transfer, posture and anti-gravity movements at supine, prone, sitting and standing positions with 58 items. The child receives 1 point for the movements he/she can perform and 0 point for the ones that he/she cannot perform. It is a reliable test with norm reference and suitable for clinical use due to taking short time.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Beck Depression Scale12 weeksBeck Depression Scale is a scale used for evaluating emotional status of the mothers and it was arranged so as to include the symptoms of depression. Items of the scale were prepared based on clinical observations and data, not based on any hypothetical opinion. The Likert type scale is composed of 21 symptom categories. Each symptom category is scored between 0 and 3 with the highest possible score of 63. Higher scores indicates more severe depression.
Nottingham Health Profile12 weeksNottingham Health Profile was used for assessment of quality of life of the mothers. This is a scale which is commonly used in clinical practice and includes 38 items that evaluate quality of life in 6 sections (pain, energy level, social isolation, emotional reaction, physical activity). Ratio of the yes answers is evaluated and each section is scored between 0 and 100 where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst score

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026