Skip to content

Robotic-assisted vs. Open Partial Nephrectomy

ROBOtic-assisted Versus Conventional Open Partial Nephrectomy: a Single-center, Open-label, Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04534998
Acronym
ROBOCOP
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-09-01
Start date
2020-06-15
Completion date
2022-03-15
Last updated
2021-09-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Cell Carcinoma

Brief summary

ROBOCOP is an open-label, randomized controlled feasibility trial comparing robotic-assisted and open partial nephrectomy in preparation for a confirmative phase III randomized controlled trial.

Detailed description

Surgical excision is the gold standard for the treatment for localized kidney cancer. An organ-preserving procedure should be carried out whenever possible in order to maintain kidney function. Partial nephrectomy can be performed through the conventional open technique as well as through a robotic-assisted approach. Although both methods belong to the standard care, there is still no published data from randomized controlled trials in the scientific literature comparing them. The ROBOCOP-trial is designed as a single-center comparison of the two surgical approaches in preparation for a phase III study. 50 patients are to be included in the trial within a period of 15 months. The primary endpoint is feasibility of patient recruitment. In addition, potential primary outcomes for a confirmative trial such as perioperative complications, quality of life, inflammatory response, survival and ergonomic aspects for the operating surgeons will be investigated.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPartial nephrectomy

Partial nephrectomy for localized kidney cancer as curative treatment.

Sponsors

Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Dietmar Hopp Stiftung
CollaboratorOTHER
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* scheduled for elective partial nephrectomy for renal neoplasms * Patient must be at least 18 years old and capable to consent * abdominal MRI or CT scan * curative-intent surgery * robotic-assisted and open approach for surgery are both feasible * ability of patient to understand the goal, consequences and alternatives of participation in the trial * written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* patients with solitary kidney * multiple kidney tumors * emergency intervention, for example because of bleeding or perforation * 2nd malignancy that will make PN needless, this does not include secondary malignancies which are under curative treatment or cases in which death from RCC is more likely * patient belongs to a vulnerable patient group * simultaneous 2nd surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recruitment rate15 monthsProportion of randomized patients in relation to the eligible ones.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kidney function - GFR90 dayspostoperative change in kidney function - glomerular filtration rate (measured in mL/min)
Length of hospital staythroughout patient´s hospital stay, on average 6 daysTotal time of hospital stay
Perioperative complicationsthroughout patient´s hospital stay, on average 6 daysMeasured with 1) the comprehensive complication index (CCI), on a scale from 0 (no complications) to 100 (death) and 2) the Clavien-Dindo classification, which consists of 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V), the first one indicating any deviation from the normal postoperative course, the highest grade indicating death
Postoperative complications90 daysMeasured with 1) the comprehensive complication index (CCI), on a scale from 0 (no complications) to 100 (death) and 2) the Clavien-Dindo classification, which consists of 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V), the first one indicating any deviation from the normal postoperative course, the highest grade indicating death
Self-reported generic health status90 daysPatient-reported generic health status using EQ-5D-5L(EuroQol-5D-5L) questionnaire (the scale ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the highest health status)
Self-reported quality of life assessment of cancer patients90 daysCancer patients will be reporting their quality of life making use of the questionnaire QLQ-C30 (Quality of Life Questionnaire C30) (range 0-100, high scores represent a better quality of life)
Self-reported quality of life in patients with kidney disease90 daysPatients will assess the influence of their kidney disease on everyday activities, work status, social interactions, mental and physical health making use of KDQOL-SF (Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form), ranging from 0 (worst possible health) to 10 (best possible health)
Self-assessment of depression in patients ≥ 65 years old90 daysElderly patients (≥ 65 years old) will report their depression symptoms filling GDS (Geriatric Depression Scale) questionnaire, ranging from 0 to 30, with 0-9 as normal, 10-19 as mildly depressed, and 20-30 as severely depressed.
Self-evaluation of cancer disease´s influence on elderly patients´ life90 daysElderly patients (≥ 65 years old) will evaluate the influence of their cancer disease on their life (activities of daily living, cognition, mood, nutritional status, mobility, polypharmacy and social support), on a scale ranging from 0 to 17, 17 indicating the best outcome possible on quality of life.
Self-assessment of comorbidity in elderly patients90 daysElderly patients (≥ 65 years old) will make use of SCQ (Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire) to assess common comorbidities; a higher score indicates higher comorbidities (range 0-39)
Postoperative self-reported quality of life90 daysParticipants will evaluate their postoperative quality of life on a 0-100 scale, higher scores indicating a better quality of life and return to daily life activities.
Operative timeImmediately after surgerySurgery duration
Inflammatory response - leucocytesthroughout patient´s hospital stay, on average 6 dayspostoperative course of inflammatory parameters (leucocytes, unit of measure: white cells x10\^9/L)
Inflammatory response - C-reactive proteinthroughout patient´s hospital stay, on average 6 dayspostoperative course of inflammatory parameters (c-reactive protein, measured in mg/L)
Inflammatory responsethroughout patient´s hospital stay, on average 6 dayspostoperative course of inflammatory parameters (IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β, VEGF, measured in ng/L)
Surgical ergonomicsImmediately after surgerySurgeons will be asked to evaluate localized muscle pain on a scale from 0 to 10, 10 indicating extreme discomfort
Resection statusup to 5 daysRate of R0/R1 status in each arm
Use of analgesiathroughout patient´s hospital stay, on average 6 daysNeed for pain medications
Trifecta outcomes of partial nephrectomy90 daysTrifecta is defined as no major complication, R0-resection status and ischemia time of less than 25 minutes
Blood lossImmediately after surgeryBlood loss during surgery
Conversion to open surgeryImmediately after surgeryRate of conversion to open surgery
Conversion to radical nephrectomyImmediately after surgeryRate of conversion to radical nephrectomy
Case cost90 daysDRG-related case costs per arm
Kidney function - creatinine90 dayspostoperative change in kidney function - creatinine (measured in mg/dL)

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactKarl-Friedrich Kowalewski, M.D.
karl-friedrich.kowalewski@umm.de00496213832201

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026