Skip to content

Comparison of the Efficacy of Duloxetine and Pregabalin in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis With Mix Type Pain

Comparison of the Efficacy of Duloxetine and Pregabalin in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis With Mix Type Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04532684
Enrollment
66
Registered
2020-08-31
Start date
2016-10-31
Completion date
2020-12-15
Last updated
2021-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Knee osteoartrhritis, Duloxetine, Pregabalin, Pain

Brief summary

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common degenerative joint disorder associated with chronic pain at older age.It is known that patients with osteoarthritis experience nociceptive and neuropathic pain to varying degrees. Addition of molecules targeting neuropathic pain to conventional therapy has been shown to improve treatment response in the management of osteoarthritis.The aim of our study is to evaluate the effect of duloxetine and pregabalin on pain, functional capacity, quality of life, depression, anxiety and sleep patterns in knee osteoarthritis.

Detailed description

A total of 66 patients (aged 40-69) with knee osteoarthritis were randomized into two treatment groups to receive either duloxetine 60mg/day or pregabalin 300mg/day. The patients were evaluated before and one month after treatment and three months after treatment using the visual analog scale (VAS-pain), Neuropathic Pain Diagnostic Questionnaire (DN4), Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis İndeks (WOMAC), Beck Depression Scale (BDS), Beck Anxiety Akalası (BAS), Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).

Interventions

DRUGDuloxetine
DRUGPregabalin

Sponsors

Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double (Participant, Outcome Assesor)

Intervention model description

Randomized prospective clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 40-69 * Diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria * Grade 2-3 knee osteoarthritis according to Kellgren-Lawrence grading system * VAS-pain score: 4 and above * Neuropathic Pain Diagnostic Questionnaire (DN4) score: 4 and above * Body mass index value: 40 and below

Exclusion criteria

* A history of trauma or surgical operation in the knee region * Diabetes mellitus * Fibromyalgia * Inflammatory rheumatic disease * Central or peripheral neurological disorder * Severe cardiac, pulmonary, or malignant disease * Invasive treatment for knee last 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessing Visual Analog Scale Score Change in Patients0.,4., and 12. weeksAll patients were asked to score the severity of their current knee pain on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS).
Neuropthic Pain Diagnostic Questionnaire (DN4)0.,4, and 12. weeksThere are 10 questions in the DN-4 including 7 questions related to pain quality and 3 questions that investigate the presence of tactile sensation, pinprick sensation, and allodynia. A total score 4/10 indicates neuropathic pain.
Assessing Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Score Change in Patients0., 4. and 12. weeksThe WOMAC consists of 24 questions that assess pain, stiffness, and problems with physical activities. The patient answers all questions on a 5-point Likert-type scale, and the total score ranges from 0 and 96.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessing Beck Depression Inventory Score Change in Patients0., 4. and 12. weeksSymptoms of depression were evaluated by means of the Beck Depression Inventory
Assessing Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire Score Change in Patients0.,4.,and 12. weeksThe SF-36 has eight subscales and consists of a total of 36 questions. The subscales are vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health. A score of 0 is equivalent to maximum disability (poor quality of life), and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability (good quality of life).
Assesing Beck Anxiety Inventory Score Change in Patients0.,4.,and 12. weeksCurrent anxiete state of patients was assessed by means of the Beck Anxiety Inventory
Assessing Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Score Change in Patients0.,4.,and 12. weeksSleep quality assessments were performed by means of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026