HIV Prevention Program, Opioid-use Disorder
Conditions
Keywords
People who inject drugs
Brief summary
This is a pilot study of an integrated rapid access HIV prevention program for People who inject drugs (PWID) called iRaPID. The program incorporates same-day access to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and Opioid Agonist Therapy (OAT).
Detailed description
A Hybrid type 1 implementation science design,will be used to pilot test the APN-led iRaPID program while exploring information on its implementation at multiple time points through the study. The hybrid type 1 pilot trial provides an implementation heuristic to assess potential research questions, perhaps more comprehensively, accurately and certainly earlier than could be achieved in a sequential 'intervention-then-preliminary-pilot study' strategy. In this hybrid type 1 pilot trial, the RCT will be utilized to: * Examine feasibility and acceptability among PWID and clinical stakeholders for an adapted APN-delivered, rapid HIV prevention program for PWID (iRaPID) that integrates same-day PrEP and OAT. * Estimate the preliminary efficacy of PrEP and OAT uptake in a pilot randomized controlled trial of the iRaPID vs. treatment as usual strategy in PWID without HIV. To assess future scale-up factors, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will be utilized with the nominal group technique (NGT). It is a conceptual framework developed to guide the assessment of multilevel implementation contexts. The CFIR framework was selected because it provides a structured menu of constructs associated with effective implementation. It consists of 5 domains with 39 underlying constructs. As recommended by Damschroder, in this study 8 CFIR constructs based on the relevancy will be measured. During the NGT, participants will be asked questions related to the multi-level implementation factors that will be based on the sample guide available on http://cfirguide.org but tailored for PWID. After posing each question, participants silently generate individual ideas. Then, using a round-robin elicitation process, each person contributes ideas that are recorded visually. They then engage in group discussion to clarify and evaluate the ideas. Items are then grouped by consensus with duplicate items removed. Then, each participant casts three votes on items as they deem them important. Votes are immediately tallied, ranked based on total number of votes, and the facilitator leads a final discussion to review the results. Sessions will take 60 minutes and be audio-recorded and transcribed.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALiRaPID
Participants randomized to the iRaPID program will receive: a) same-day access to PrEP and OAT and educational counseling by the APN; b) safety-check phone calls/SMS; c) follow-up phone call/SMS; and d) clinical visit at Day 30
OTHERStandard of Care
PWID participants randomized to the training as usual (TAU) will follow the existing clinical guidelines to receive PrEP, OAT, or both.
Sponsors
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
University of Connecticut
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
PWID 1. Age ≥18 years 2. HIV-negative 3. Reporting injection drug use (past 3 months) 4. Substantial ongoing risk for HIV acquisition 5. OUD based on the DSM-V criteria Stakeholders 1. Age ≥18 years 2. APNs, patient navigators, counselors, and administrators who reflect the range of characteristics of staff members that are involved in HIV care to PWID
Exclusion criteria
PWID and stakeholders An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: 1. Unable to provide informed consent 2. Unable to read and understand English
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility - participants screened | 6 months | The number of participants screened will be used as a measure of feasibility |
| Feasibility - participants recruited | 6 months | The number of participants recruited will be used as a measurement of feasibility |
| Feasibility - participants randomized | 6 months | The number of participants randomized will be used as a measurement of feasibility |
| Feasibility - participants retained | 6 months | The number of participants retained will be used as a measurement of feasibility |
| Feasibility - treatment adherence | 6 months | The number of participants that adhere to treatment will be used as a measurement of feasibility |
| Acceptability | 6 months | Acceptability will be measured using a 10-item acceptability rating profile. Acceptability will be based on descriptive statistics from the acceptability measures (score ≥70) and analysis of qualitative data, which will be done using thematic analysis |
| Uptake of PrEP and OAT | 6 month | PrEP uptake proportion at 6-month follow-up will be estimated and compared using linear contrast statement in SAS. |
| Adherence to PrEP | 6 months | Adherence to PrEP will be measured using the visual analogue scale and dried blood spots |
| Persistence on PrEP | 6 months | Persistence on PrEP will be measured by collecting information on refilled within 30 days after exhausting PrEP from previous fill data |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed