Skip to content

Study to Determine Skin Irritation and/or Sensitization Potential of an Antifungal Cream Containing Trolamine (Repeated Insult Patch Test)

HT201321- Repeated Insult Patch Test With Modified Challenge

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04531540
Enrollment
225
Registered
2020-08-28
Start date
2013-09-09
Completion date
2013-10-18
Last updated
2020-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypersensitivity

Brief summary

In this study researcher want to learn more about possible skin reactions such after repeated application of an antifungal cream containing Trolamine. They are especially interested in skin irritations or allergic skin reactions. The study plans to enroll about 225 female or male participants with the age 18 - 79 years. The antifungal test cream will be applied on the back between the shoulder blades of the participants and covered by a special dressing patch. This will be repeated 3 times a week for the first 3 weeks of this study applying the cream on the same area of the back. At each visit the skin will be investigated for redness, dryness and other reactions. After a rest period of two weeks the test cream will be applied on the same skin area as before and on a second new skin area nearby. After 2 and 4 days the two skin areas will again be investigated for redness, dryness and other reactions.

Interventions

Approximately 0.2 g of cream containing butenafine HCl 1% were applied to the upper back skin.

Sponsors

Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must have been aged 18 to 79 years, inclusive; * Female subjects must have produced a negative urine pregnancy test prior to the initiation and also at the completion of the trial; * Subjects must have been capable of understanding and following directions.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who were in ill health or taking medication, other than birth control, which could influence the purpose, integrity or outcome of the trial; * Subjects who had any visible skin disease that might be confused with a skin reaction to the test material; * Subjects who were participating in another clinical trial at this facility or any other facility; * Subjects who used topical or systemic steroids or antihistamines for at least 7 days prior to trial initiation and during the duration of the trial; * Subjects who had a history of adverse reactions to adhesive tape, cosmetics, OTC drugs or other personal care products; * Subjects judged by the PI to be inappropriate for the trial; * Female subjects who were pregnant as evidenced by a urine pregnancy test, planning to become pregnant, or nursing during the course of the trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Irritation Response Evaluation According to Erythema Scoring Scale During Induction Phase - All Enrolled SubjectsAfter 4 weeksPrior to each patch application and after the last patch removal, the test sites were evaluated for gross changes according to the Erythema Scoring Scale: score 0=No visible erythema; score 0.5=Slight, barely perceptible erythema; score 1=Mild erythema; score 2=Moderate erythema; score 3=Marked erythema; score 4=Severe erythema.
Allergic Reaction Evaluation According to Erythema Scoring Scale During Challenge Phase - All Enrolled SubjectsAfter 6 weeksPrior to each patch application and after the last patch removal, the test sites were evaluated for gross changes according to the Erythema Scoring Scale: score 0=No visible erythema; score 0.5=Slight, barely perceptible erythema; score 1=Mild erythema; score 2=Moderate erythema; score 3=Marked erythema; score 4=Severe erythema.
Irritation Response Evaluation According to Erythema Scoring Scale During Induction Phase - All Evaluable SubjectsAfter 4 weeksPrior to each patch application and after the last patch removal, the test sites were evaluated for gross changes according to the Erythema Scoring Scale: score 0=No visible erythema; score 0.5=Slight, barely perceptible erythema; score 1=Mild erythema; score 2=Moderate erythema; score 3=Marked erythema; score 4=Severe erythema.
Allergic Reaction Evaluation According to Erythema Scoring Scale During Challenge Phase - All Evaluable SubjectsAfter 6 weeksPrior to each patch application and after the last patch removal, the test sites were evaluated for gross changes according to the Erythema Scoring Scale: score 0=No visible erythema; score 0.5=Slight, barely perceptible erythema; score 1=Mild erythema; score 2=Moderate erythema; score 3=Marked erythema; score 4=Severe erythema.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study was conducted at single center in the US, between 9 SEP 2013 (first subject first visit) and 18 OCT 2013 (last subject last visit).

Pre-assignment details

A total of 225 subjects were enrolled in the study and 222 received study treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Repeated Insult Patch Test
During the Induction Phase, participants received 0.2 g Butenafine HCl 1% covered by an occlusive patch on the upper back skin test site three times a week for a total of 9 applications. Prior to each patch application and after the last patch removal, the test sites were evaluated for gross changes according to the Erythemal Scoring Scale and if necessary the Additional Scoring system. After 14 days of Rest Phase, on the first day of Challenge Phase, participants received same procedure on original Induction Phase test site and on a virgin test site. The patches were removed and the sites scored 48 hours after application and scored again at 96 hours after application. The test sites were evaluated using the Induction Phase scoring system.
225
Total225

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyFound to be Ineligible1
Overall StudyProtocol Violation3
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRepeated Insult Patch Test
Age, Continuous55.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
23 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
154 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian/African American
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian/American Indian
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian/Hispanic
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
38 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Available
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
159 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
66 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 225
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 225

Outcome results

Primary

Allergic Reaction Evaluation According to Erythema Scoring Scale During Challenge Phase - All Enrolled Subjects

Prior to each patch application and after the last patch removal, the test sites were evaluated for gross changes according to the Erythema Scoring Scale: score 0=No visible erythema; score 0.5=Slight, barely perceptible erythema; score 1=Mild erythema; score 2=Moderate erythema; score 3=Marked erythema; score 4=Severe erythema.

Time frame: After 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Repeated Insult Patch TestAllergic Reaction Evaluation According to Erythema Scoring Scale During Challenge Phase - All Enrolled Subjectsscore=01296 Test site
Repeated Insult Patch TestAllergic Reaction Evaluation According to Erythema Scoring Scale During Challenge Phase - All Enrolled Subjectsscore=0.50 Test site
Primary

Allergic Reaction Evaluation According to Erythema Scoring Scale During Challenge Phase - All Evaluable Subjects

Prior to each patch application and after the last patch removal, the test sites were evaluated for gross changes according to the Erythema Scoring Scale: score 0=No visible erythema; score 0.5=Slight, barely perceptible erythema; score 1=Mild erythema; score 2=Moderate erythema; score 3=Marked erythema; score 4=Severe erythema.

Time frame: After 6 weeks

Population: Subjects who received treatment and completed the trial and had evaluable data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Repeated Insult Patch TestAllergic Reaction Evaluation According to Erythema Scoring Scale During Challenge Phase - All Evaluable Subjectsscore=01296 Test site
Repeated Insult Patch TestAllergic Reaction Evaluation According to Erythema Scoring Scale During Challenge Phase - All Evaluable Subjectsscore=0.50 Test site
Primary

Irritation Response Evaluation According to Erythema Scoring Scale During Induction Phase - All Enrolled Subjects

Prior to each patch application and after the last patch removal, the test sites were evaluated for gross changes according to the Erythema Scoring Scale: score 0=No visible erythema; score 0.5=Slight, barely perceptible erythema; score 1=Mild erythema; score 2=Moderate erythema; score 3=Marked erythema; score 4=Severe erythema.

Time frame: After 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Repeated Insult Patch TestIrritation Response Evaluation According to Erythema Scoring Scale During Induction Phase - All Enrolled Subjectsscore=02182 Test site
Repeated Insult Patch TestIrritation Response Evaluation According to Erythema Scoring Scale During Induction Phase - All Enrolled Subjectsscore=0.52 Test site
Primary

Irritation Response Evaluation According to Erythema Scoring Scale During Induction Phase - All Evaluable Subjects

Prior to each patch application and after the last patch removal, the test sites were evaluated for gross changes according to the Erythema Scoring Scale: score 0=No visible erythema; score 0.5=Slight, barely perceptible erythema; score 1=Mild erythema; score 2=Moderate erythema; score 3=Marked erythema; score 4=Severe erythema.

Time frame: After 4 weeks

Population: Subjects who received treatment and completed the trial and had evaluable data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Repeated Insult Patch TestIrritation Response Evaluation According to Erythema Scoring Scale During Induction Phase - All Evaluable Subjectsscore=02158 Test site
Repeated Insult Patch TestIrritation Response Evaluation According to Erythema Scoring Scale During Induction Phase - All Evaluable Subjectsscore=0.52 Test site

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026