Skip to content

NETwork of Linoleic Acid Supplementation in Cystic Fibrosis

Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study of Linoleic Acid Supplementation for 1 Year in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis - Influence on Clinical Status and Metabolism

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04531410
Acronym
NETLACF
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-08-28
Start date
2021-10-25
Completion date
2024-11-05
Last updated
2024-11-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cystic Fibrosis

Keywords

arachidonic acid,, lipid mediators, cytokines, growth, pulmonary function, IGF-1, resting energy expenditure, docosahexaenoic acid

Brief summary

Undernutrition is a common problem in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) despite international consensus that the patients shall be given 120-200% of energy recommendations. Studies imply that one problem might be that the patients are not compensated for the essential fatty acid deficiency (linoleic acid, LA), which is well known in these patients. This deficiency is shown not to be due to fat malabsorption, but related to an increased turnover of arachidonic acid, a transformation product of LA. This abnormality is related to mutations associated with a more severe clinical phenotype. The most common and typical symptom of LA deficiency is poor growth. Studies in animals have further indicated that many of the symptoms in CF are related to the deficiency. A series of recent prospective studies from Wisconsin corroborate the importance of LA for growth. In Sweden LA has been supplemented to most patients since the late 70´, and the condition of patients have been among the leading in the world regarding growth, pulmonary function and survival. Short-term studies have shown better effect of LA supplementation compared to similar supply of energy without including extra LA. There are few long-term studies, performed before the gene was identified, giving very heterogeneous patient groups in regard to genotype, but with some positive results on growth and physiology. It´s of interest that modern personalized extremely expensive therapy with correctors and potentiators for Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator may influence lipid metabolism. LA might thus tentatively be a cheap adjuvant to this modern therapy, but this has to be specially studied. The aim of the study is to find if there are differences in clinical and metabolic outcome between two groups, blindly given similar amount of extra calories, in one group consisting of linoleic acid.The benefit for the patients would be great if the expected positive effect can be proved in the planned study. The treatment will be cheap and without adverse effects. From socioeconomic point of view is would be a great advantage.

Detailed description

Two group of matched children with CF were randomized to two type of oils given 20 g oil and 600 mg DHA daily for one year and anthropometry, pulmonary function, biochemistry, resting energy expenditure, lipid mediators, inflammatory and intestinal markers were studied at start and at 6 months and 1 year. Dietary intake was controlled and life quality recording at start and end of study.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTlinoleic acid supplementation

Oils given daily at morning meal with extra enzymes

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENToleic acid supplementation

Oils given at morning meal with extra enzymes

Sponsors

European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
CollaboratorOTHER
Karolinska Institutet
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The supplement only differ by colour on capsulae, no labelling

Intervention model description

Parallel, double blind, randomized

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Two mutations related to severe clinical status such as dF508, or other stop mutations or class II mutations. Severe status includes pancreatic insufficiency

Exclusion criteria

* Liver cirrhosis and/or portal hypertension, transplantation or on transplantation list, intake of lipid supplements the latest 2 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Growth1 yearchange in BMI, standard deviation score (SDS)
Weight1 yearchange in SDS body weight
Height1 yearchange in SDS height

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life, the patient experience of well being1 yearQuestionaire about health, physical activity, well being (8 items), CFQ-child + CFQ- parents (higher rates are better) The score changes are analysed.The CFQ considers the physical, image, digestive, respiratory, emotional, social, food, treatment, vitality, health, social role and weight domains. Each domain has a score and its sum generates the total score, whose values can vary from 0 to 100 The scores will also be related to measurements.
Pulmonary function1 yearchange in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1 % of predicted)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Influence on sodium status1 yearchange in Sodium in sweat test, mol/L and urine (fractional sodium excretion)
Inflammatory markers1 yearchange in Cytokines, Proximity extension assays (PEA proteomics) picogram/ml
Metabolic marker1 yearChange in serum insulin growth factor -1 (IGF-1, nanogram/ml)
Energy metabolism1 yearChange in resting energy expenditure (REE/kg body weight)
Bone mineral density1 yearChange in total bone mineral density by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), gram/cm\^2
Oral glucose tolerance1 yearMeasure of glucose and insuline after oral glucose loading
Lipid mediators1 yearchange in lipid mediators in blood and urine, ion trap- Mass Spectrometry, picoMol (\> 150 products of both the n-6 and n-3 series)
Clinical infectious status1 yearchange in number exacerbations compare to previous year,

Countries

Italy, Norway, Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026