Skip to content

EMI-EHP Weight Management and Type 2 Diabetes Pragmatic Trial

An ObEsity-centric Approach With and Without Anti-obesity Medications ComPared to the Usual-care ApprOach to Management of Patients With Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes in an Employer Setting: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04531176
Acronym
EMPOWER-T2D
Enrollment
74
Registered
2020-08-28
Start date
2020-09-01
Completion date
2023-08-04
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes, Obesity

Brief summary

This is a pragmatic, 24 month, single-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial comparing an obesity-centric approach with a medically-supervised and comprehensive weight loss program (Cleveland Clinic's Endocrinology and Metabolism Institute's Integrated Weight Management Program) augmented by AOMs, vs. an obesity-centric approach with a medically-supervised and comprehensive weight loss program without AOMs, vs. the current usual care approach to general health management. Informed consent will be obtained. IRB approval of the study will be obtained. 300 subjects (employees or spouses covered by our EHP) will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive either an obesity-centric approach with AOM therapy (N=100), an obesity-centric approach without AOM therapy (N=100), or the current usual care approach to general health management (N=100).

Detailed description

Obesity affects nearly 40% of adults in the US and it is responsible for important medical problems including hypertension, dyslipidemia, T2D, depression, coronary heart disease, stroke, osteoarthritis, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), fatty liver disease, and some cancers, to name a few4,5. Obesity is responsible for the development of T2D and hypertension in more than 90% and 50% of cases, respectively6-7. Also more than 70% of patients with obesity have dyslipidemia. The prevalence of depression in patients with obesity is more than 50% and obesity is responsible for causing osteoarthritis in more than 25% of the patients8. Also, in the adult population, the prevalence of OSA is estimated to be \ 25%, and as high as 45% in subjects with obesity9. Patients with obesity have an increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death. In recognition of the biologic basis and seriousness of obesity, several professional health associations and organizations worldwide recognize obesity as a disease10. Even though there is clear evidence in the literature that weight loss is associated with a dramatic improvement of obesity-related comorbidities and the patient's quality of life, in general, clinicians all over the world focus their attention on treating the diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and other comorbidities rather than the obesity itself, concentrating their efforts on improving blood glucose indices, blood pressure and LDL as well as triglycerides, and in many instances, prescribing anti-diabetes and antihypertensive medications that potentiate further weight gain11,12. As a result, clinicians are faced with a rising epidemic of obesity, perpetuating a preexisting epidemic of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome. Obesity is one of the biggest drivers of preventable chronic diseases and healthcare costs in the United States. Currently, estimates for these costs are $210 billion per year. In addition, obesity is associated with job absenteeism and with lower productivity while at work costing approximately $4.3 billion annually12,13. As a person's BMI increases, so do the number of sick days, medical claims and healthcare costs. Individuals who suffer obesity spend 42% more on direct healthcare costs than adults who have a healthy weight. Individuals with grade 1 obesity (BMI between 30 and 35) are more than twice as likely as individuals with BMI \< 30 to be prescribed prescription pharmaceuticals to manage medical conditions14. Reducing obesity, improving nutrition, increasing physical activity, and making lifelong meaningful lifestyle changes can help lower costs through fewer doctor's office visits, tests, prescription drugs, sick days, emergency room visits and admissions to the hospital and lower the risk for a wide range of diseases. A 2008 study by the Urban Institute, The New York Academy of Medicine and Trust for America's Health found that an investment of $10 per person in proven community-based programs to increase physical activity, improve nutrition, and prevent smoking and other tobacco use could save the country more than $16 billion annually within five years. That's a return of $5.60 for every $1 invested15. In spite of these important facts there is a significant, yet much-underutilized role, for structured weight management programs, both with and without use of anti-obesity medications, to improve metabolic control for patients with obesity who have developed comorbidities such as hypertension hyperlipidemia and T2D. Unfortunately, these patients have a much higher risk of developing coronary artery disease and cancer. The medical literature contains ample evidence which demonstrates the positive impact that a lifestyle intervention program augmented by FDA approved AOMs can have on anthropometric and metabolic parameters in patients with obesity who have developed significant comorbidities16-17. Lifestyle intervention, in the form of improving diet, eating behaviors and increasing physical activity, is first-line treatment for obesity and overweight, but the majority of people with obesity and overweight struggle to achieve and maintain their weight loss long-term. We hypothesize that an obesity-centric approach delivered through a medically-supervised and comprehensive weight loss program18, augmented by AOM, as the primary treatment of patients with obesity and T2D, will result in greater and sustainable weight loss, a better metabolic profile, (including glycemic blood pressure and cholesterol control) and improved quality of life (QOL) and treatment satisfaction when compared to an obesity-centric approach without AOM therapy or the current usual care/standard of care comorbidity-centric approach to general health management in patients with obesity and T2D. If confirmed, these findings would be expected to change our future approach to chronic diseases management, and reduce the rates of T2D, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia related complications (including heart disease and cancer) as well as the development of other obesity-related comorbidities, potentially reducing the long-term cost of care

Interventions

Weight Management Program (WMP)

Traditional care

DRUGPhentermine / Topiramate Extended Release Oral Capsule

Medication for chronic weight management (Rx)

DRUGnaltrexone/bupropion extended-release

Medication for chronic weight management (Rx)

Medication for chronic weight management (Rx)

DRUGOrlistat

Medication for chronic weight management (Rx)

Sponsors

The Cleveland Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Gender: men and women 2. Ethnicity: all ethnic groups 3. Age: ≥18, \< 75 years 4. Diagnosis of T2D -A1C within the last 90 days must be \>7.5% 5. Obesity, BMI ≥30 6. An Employee, or the significant other of an employee, that is covered by the Cleveland Clinic Employee Health Plan

Exclusion criteria

1. Type 1 diabetes or known latent autoimmune diabetes of adulthood (LADA) 2. Glomerular Filtration Rate \<30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Equation, CKD-EPI) 3. Current glucocorticoid therapy 4. Currently or within the past 3 months receiving an anti-obesity medication, or any other medication used for the primary intent of weight loss 5. Any condition, unwillingness or inability, not covered by any of the other

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Body Weight Between Baseline and 12 Months12 MonthsAll relevant time points used in the calculation in the Time Frame between baseline and 12 months. Measured in the mean Change in body weight between baseline and 12 months measured in percentage (%) of body weight loss
Mean Change in A1C12 MonthsAll relevant time points used in the calculation in the Time Frame between baseline and 12 months. Measured in the mean change of the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin from baseline to 12 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Obesity-centric Approach + AOM
Participants will receive Cleveland Clinic's Integrated Medical WMP with medication for chronic weight management (Rx) for approximately two years. After discussing with the study doctor, participants will receive one of the following listed 4 drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for long-term weight loss: 1) orlistat, 2) phentermine/topiramate extended-release, 3) naltrexone/bupropion extended-release and 4) liraglutide 3.0 mg Weight Management Program (WMP): Weight Management Program (WMP) Phentermine / Topiramate Extended Release Oral Capsule: Medication for chronic weight management (Rx) naltrexone/bupropion extended-release: Medication for chronic weight management (Rx) liraglutide 3.0 mg: Medication for chronic weight management (Rx) Orlistat: Medication for chronic weight management (Rx)
24
Obesity-centric Approach Without AOM
Participants will receive Cleveland Clinic's Integrated Medical WMP alone for approximately two years. Weight Management Program (WMP): Weight Management Program (WMP)
23
Usual Care Approach (Comorbidity-centric Approach)
Participants will receive the traditional usual care/standard of care approach to T2D, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia management for approximately two years. Traditional care: Traditional care
23
Total70

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyStudy was stopped early242624

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicObesity-centric Approach + AOMObesity-centric Approach Without AOMUsual Care Approach (Comorbidity-centric Approach)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
24 Participants23 Participants23 Participants70 Participants
Age, Continuous53.5 years53.5 years53 years53.5 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants0 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants22 Participants20 Participants62 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants6 Participants7 Participants20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
16 Participants16 Participants16 Participants48 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
24 participants23 participants23 participants70 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants13 Participants13 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants10 Participants10 Participants29 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 240 / 230 / 23
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 240 / 232 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 241 / 230 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change in A1C

All relevant time points used in the calculation in the Time Frame between baseline and 12 months. Measured in the mean change of the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin from baseline to 12 months

Time frame: 12 Months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Obesity-centric Approach + AOMMean Change in A1C-2.18 Percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Obesity-centric Approach Without AOMMean Change in A1C-2.22 Percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Usual Care Approach (Comorbidity-centric Approach)Mean Change in A1C-1.65 Percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
p-value: 0.05t-test, 1 sided
Primary

Mean Change in Body Weight Between Baseline and 12 Months

All relevant time points used in the calculation in the Time Frame between baseline and 12 months. Measured in the mean Change in body weight between baseline and 12 months measured in percentage (%) of body weight loss

Time frame: 12 Months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Obesity-centric Approach + AOMMean Change in Body Weight Between Baseline and 12 Months-8.74 % of body weight
Obesity-centric Approach Without AOMMean Change in Body Weight Between Baseline and 12 Months-6.68 % of body weight
Usual Care Approach (Comorbidity-centric Approach)Mean Change in Body Weight Between Baseline and 12 Months-4.48 % of body weight
p-value: 0.004t-test, 1 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026