Skip to content

PEP Flute-selfcare in COVID-19

PEP Flute-selfcare to Prevent Respiratory Deterioration and Hospitalization Among COVID-19 Patients: a Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04530435
Acronym
PEP-CoV
Enrollment
378
Registered
2020-08-28
Start date
2020-10-06
Completion date
2021-09-01
Last updated
2022-03-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2

Keywords

COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Respiratory symptoms, Positive expiratory pressure, Positive expiratory pressure flute, Airway clearance techniques

Brief summary

Most research on the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 disease relate to screening measures, development of vaccines and optimising treatment of hospitalised patients. It is likely that this pandemic will be ongoing for several years until a high level of immunity is reached in the population or a vaccine has been developed. Thus, there is a need of measures to help the SARS-CoV-2 infected individual at home to overcome the course of disease with less symptoms and strain. A Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEP) flute is feasible for home use and it is possible that regular use of PEP flute may prevent the progression of respiratory symptoms in non-hospitalized individuals with COVID-19 disease. The primary objective of the study is to examine the effect of PEP flute use among SARS-CoV-2 infected, non-hospitalized patients on self-reported change in COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score during 30 days of follow-up. The secondary objectives are to compare the development in hospitalization rates and use of antibiotics in the intervention group and the control group during the follow-up period.

Detailed description

It is hypothesized that the PEP flute has positive effects on SARS-CoV-2 infected individual's self-reported respiratory symptoms such as dyspnoea, coughing and perceived mucus clearance through beneficial effects on lung function and airway clearance. Furthermore, the investigators expect a lower rate of hospitalization and use of antibiotics in the intervention group as compared to the control group. Finally, potential subgroup effects by gender, age, comorbidity and BMI at study entry will be explored for all outcomes. Based upon a sample size estimation the investigators assess that inclusion of 200 participants in each intervention arm will be an adequate number. Based on the present testing strategy and COVID-19 incidence, current expectations are that two months should be enough to recruit 400 patients. The investigators will allow for recruitment to the end of December 2020, but will terminate enrolment at n = 400. Link to detailed protocol paper will be added once published.

Interventions

DEVICEPEP flute

Participants are advised to use a PEP flute at least three times daily at an appropriate resistance. Ideally, each session consists of 15 breaths (for approximately 1 minute) repeated twice at an upright position.

Sponsors

Hvidovre University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Bispebjerg Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation where possible. This is of outmost importance, and participants are requested not to disclose their allocation when outcomes are assessed. To test the blinding efficacy, the outcome assessors are asked what treatment strategy they think a patient has received after assessments.

Intervention model description

This study is designed as a randomised, controlled, open-label trial with two parallel groups and a primary endpoint of CAT-score after 30 days of intervention. Randomization lists will be computer-generated using an appropriate statistical software and based upon permuted random blocks. The allocation ratio will be 1:1 stratified for the following baseline conditions: * Sex * Age (≥60 and \<60 years)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Positive SARS-CoV-2 * Symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection e.g. fever, cough and shortness of breath. * Access to use a smartphone * Can reply to a questionnaire (sent on email, text messages or via telephone interview) in Danish * Given informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years. * Any condition or impairment that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes a potential participant unsuitable for participation or which obstruct participation, such as psychiatric disorders. * Hospitalised patients or citizens living in nursing homes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-reported CAT-score (COPD Assessment Test)Day 30.CAT-scores will be measured using a telephone administered questionnaire. The CAT-score is validated to evaluate symptoms in COPD patients. Eight items covers symptoms of cough, sputum, chest pain, dyspnoea, activities of daily living at home, feeling safe at home despite symptoms (modified for the present study from feeling safe at leaving home despite symptoms), sleep quality and vigour. The eight items sum up to a range of 0-40 with higher scores indicating more respiratory impairment. Although validated for COPD-use, the CAT-scale is considered useful in the present study because several of the items (dyspnoea, cough, fatigue, sputum and pleuritic chest pain) previously have been used as outcome variables in pneumonia studies. The outcome assessment can be taken within + 1 week for the scheduled visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospital admissionsUp to day 30, 90 and 180.Will be obtained from the Danish National Patient Registry, from which also data of comorbidity will be retrieved.
Use of antibioticsUp to day 30, 90 and 180.Will be obtained from the Danish National Prescription Registry.
Self-reported CAT-score (COPD Assessment Test)Day 90, Day 180.CAT-scores will be measured using a telephone or email-administered questionnaire. The outcome assessment can be taken within + 1 week for the scheduled visit.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serious Adverse EventsDuring treatment, up to 30 days.Assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE).
General and respiratory symptomsDay 30, 90, Day 180.Measured according to the COVIDmeter from Statens Serum Institut using a telephone or email-administered questionnaire. The outcome assessment can be taken within + 1 week for the scheduled visit.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026