Skip to content

Added Value of Vein of Marshal Ethanol Infusion Compared to Superior Vena Cava Isolation Alone in Patients Undergoing Repeat Ablation for Recurrent Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Despite Durable PV Isolation

Added Value of Vein of Marshal Ethanol Infusion Compared to Superior Vena Cava Isolation Alone in Patients Undergoing Repeat Ablation for Recurrent Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Despite Durable Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04529785
Acronym
VEIN-AF
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-08-28
Start date
2020-09-11
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2026-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

The superior vena cava (SVC) is one of the most common non pulmonary vein (PV)-triggers for atrial tachyarrhythmias. SVC electrical isolation can be reached by circular radiofrequency (RF)-ablation under close monitoring of the phrenic nerve. However, adding substrate modification and vein of Marshal (VoM) ethanol infusion to the ablation procedure might substantially improve long-term outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the recurrence rate 1 year after the index ablation in patients undergoing a redo ablation for recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) despite durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with either SVC isolation alone or with substrate modification including vein of Marshal ethanolisation in addition to SVC isolation alone

Interventions

PROCEDURESVC only

Patients allocated to this arm will receive an RF ablation with the isolation of the SVC alone

PROCEDURESVC isolation with substrate modification and vein of Marshal ethanol infusion

Patients allocated to this arm will receive an RF ablation with the isolation of the SVC, substrate modification and vein of Marshal ethanol infusion

Sponsors

AZ Sint-Jan AV
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients older than 18 years * Patients scheduled for a repeat ablation of PAF after a previous PVI * Confirmation of lasting pulmonary vein isolation at the time of randomization

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation * Previous ablation with isolation of the SVC, roofline, mitral line or previous vein of Marshal ethanol infusion * Left atrial thrombus. Left atrial appendage thrombus can be determined by preprocedural imaging: CT, transesophageal echocardiography or MRI. * Left ventricular ejection fraction \<35%. * Cardiac surgery within the previous 90 days. * Expecting cardiac transplantation or other cardiac surgery within 180 days. * Coronary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty/stenting within the previous 90 days or myocardial infarction within the previous 60 days. * Documented history of a thromboembolic event within the previous 90 days. * Diagnosed atrial myxoma. * Significant restrictive, constrictive, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with chronic symptoms. * Significant congenital anomaly or medical problem that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude enrollment * Women who are pregnant or who plan to become pregnant during the study. * Acute illness or active infection at time of index procedure * Advanced renal insufficiency * Unstable angina. * History of blood clotting or bleeding abnormalities. * Contraindication to anticoagulation. * Life expectancy less than 1 year. * Presence of a condition that precludes vascular access. * International Normalized Ratio greater than 3.5 within 24 hours of procedure - for patients taking warfarin. * Patient cannot be removed from antiarrhythmic drugs for reasons other than AF. * Unwilling or unable to provide informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia 1 year after the index ablation1 yearComparison of the prevalence of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence 1 year after the index ablation between groups
Safety (complications)During procedureComparison of the number of procedural complications between groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total procedural timeDuring procedureComparison of the procedural time between groups
Fluoroscopy timeDuring procedureComparison of the fluoroscopy time between groups
RF ablation timeDuring procedureComparison of the radiofrequency time between groups

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

CONTACTMichelle Lycke, MSc, PhD
michelle.lycke@azsintjan.be+32 50 45 32 93
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSébastien Knecht, MD, PhD

AZ Sint-Jan AV

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 13, 2026