Skip to content

Proton Versus Photon Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

A Randomized Phase II Trial Evaluating Toxicity and Efficacy Between Proton and Photon for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04528394
Enrollment
136
Registered
2020-08-27
Start date
2019-04-29
Completion date
2022-06-30
Last updated
2020-08-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Keywords

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, Proton beam therapy, Carbon-ion radiotherapy, Toxicity, Survival, Disease control

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the toxicity and therapeutic efficacy of proton or photon combined with carbon ion radiotherapy for newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Participants will be randomized to 2 arms. Arm 1, participants received photon combined with carbon ion radiotherapy group, Arm 2, participants received proton combined with carbon ion radiotherapy.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to compare the toxicity and therapeutic efficacy of photon or proton combined with carbon ion radiotherapy for newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Participants will be randomized to 2 arms. Arm 1 participants received photon combined with carbon ion radiotherapy (photon: 56 Gy/28 Fx, plus carbon: 15-17.5 gray equivalent \[GyE\]/5 Fx for boost). Arm 2, participants received proton combined with carbon ion radiotherapy (proton: 56 GyE/28 Fx, plus carbon: 15-17.5 GyE/5 Fx for boost). Adverse events will be documented according to CTCAE v4.03.The response of treatment will be evaluated according to RECIST criteria.

Interventions

RADIATIONPhoton

Photon combined with Carbon ion in Arm 1

RADIATIONProton

Proton combined with Carbon ion in Arm 2

RADIATIONCarbon ion

Same dose and fractionation will be used in both arms.

Sponsors

Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pathologically confirmed Nasopharyngeal carcinoma(WHO II/III type). * Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 70 years of age. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score: 0-1. * Adequate laboratory values within 30 dyas of enrollment to study defined as follows: 1) neutrophil \> 2000/mm\^3; 2) platelet \> 100,000/mm\^3; 3) total bilirubin \< 1.5mg/dl; 4) alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase \< 1.5 upper limit of normal; 5) SCr \< 1.5mg/dl; creatinine clearance rate \> 60ml/min. * Willing to accept adequate contraception for women with childbearing potential. * Willing to sign the written informed consent; Informed consent must be signed before the enrollment in the trial.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of distant metastasis. * Received radiotherapy for head and neck before. * Received surgery(except for biopsy) for primary lesion or cervical lymph node. * Previous history of malignant tumor (within 5 years) or simultaneous existence of multiple primary tumors. * Presence of diseases (such as Sjögren syndrome) that may interfere evaluation of xerostomia. * Accompanied with severe major organ dysfunction. * Presence of mental disease that may influence the understanding of informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with treatment-related Xerostomia (≥Grade 2) as assessed by NCI CTCAE v4.03Xerostomia (≥Grade 2) occurred at 6 months after completion of radiotherapyCTCAE refers to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, which is one of the most frequently used criteria for toxicity grading after anti-cancer treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free survival of all patientsFrom randomization to death or disease progression, a median of 3 years.
Local controlFrom randomization to local failure, a median of 3 years.
Overall survival of all patientsFrom randomization to death, a median of 3 years.
Distant controlFrom randomization to distant failure, a median of 3 year.
Treatment-related adverse events as assessed by NCI CTCAE v4.03Time interval from start to 3 months after completion of radiotherapy.Acute and late toxicities induced by radiation therapy other than xerostomia.
Regional controlFrom randomization to regional failure, a median of 3 years.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactLin Kong, MD
lin.kong@sphic.org.cn133XXX
Backup ContactJiyi Hu, MD
jiyi.hu@sphic.org.cn1333XXX

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026