Primary Biliary Cirrhosis
Conditions
Keywords
Primary Biliary Cholangitis, PBC, Elafibranor
Brief summary
The participants of this study will have confirmed Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) with inadequate response or intolerance to ursodeoxycholic acid (which is a medication used in the management and treatment of cholestatic liver disease). PBC is a slowly progressive disease characterized by damage of the bile ducts in the liver, leading to a buildup of bile acids which causes further damage. The liver damage in PBC may lead to scarring (cirrhosis). PBC may also be associated with multiple symptoms. Many patients with PBC may require liver transplant or may die if the disease progresses and a liver transplant is not done. The main aim of this study is to determine if elafibranor (the study drug) is better than placebo (a dummy treatment) at decreasing the levels of a specific blood test (alkaline phosphatase) that provides information about participant's disease. This study will also evaluate the safety of long-term treatment with elafibranor, as well as the impact on symptoms such as itchy skin (pruritus) and tiredness (fatigue). This study has two main parts: Part 1 will compare a daily dose of elafibranor to a daily dose of placebo and will last between a minimum of one year and a maximum of two years. Part 2, all participants will receive elafibranor for a period of up to 5 years or until the total treatment duration (part 1 and part 2) reaches 6 years, whichever occurs first.
Interventions
Elafibranor 80mg daily
Placebo daily
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
This is a double-blind (DB), randomized, placebo-controlled study followed by an open-label long term extension (LTE)
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Males or females age of 18 to 75 years (inclusive) * Definite or probable Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) diagnosis * Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥ 1.67x upper limit of normal (ULN) * Total bilirubin (TB) ≤ 2x ULN * Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for at least 12 months (stable dose ≥ 3 months) prior to screening, or unable to tolerate UDCA treatment (no UDCA for ≥ 3 months) prior to screening (per country standard-of-care dosing) * Must have PBC Worst Itch Numeric rating scale (NRS) collected prior to randomization * Females participating in this study must be of non-child bearing potential or must be using highly efficient contraception for the full duration of the study and for 1 month after the last drug intake
Exclusion criteria
* History or presence of other concomitant liver disease * Clinically significant hepatic decompensation, including patients with complications of cirrhosis/portal hypertension * Medical conditions that may cause non-hepatic increases in ALP (e.g., Paget's disease) or which may diminish life expectancy to \< 2 years, including known cancers * Patient has a positive test for HIV Type 1 or 2 at screening, or patient is known to have tested positive for HIV * Evidence of any other unstable or untreated clinically significant disease * History of alcohol abuse * For female patients: known pregnancy or lactating * Use of fibrates and glitazones within 2 months prior to screening * Use of Obeticholic acid (OCA), azathioprine, cyclosporine, methotrexate, mycophenolate, pentoxifylline, budesonide and other systemic corticosteroids (parenteral and oral chronic administration only); potentially hepatotoxic drugs * (including α-methyl-dopa, sodium valproic acid isoniazid, or nitrofurantoin) within 3 months prior to screening * Use of antibodies or immunotherapy directed against interleukins (ILs) or other cytokines or chemokines within 12 months prior to screening * For patients with previous exposure to OCA, OCA should be discontinued 3 months prior to screening * Patients who are currently participating in, plan to participate in, or have participated in an investigational drug study or medical device study containing active substance within 30 days or five half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to screening; for patients with previous exposure to seladelpar, seladelpar should be discontinued 3 months prior to screening * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) values \> 5 x ULN * For patients with AT or TB\>ULN at SV1, variability of AT or TB \> 40% (see section 3.5.1) * Albumin\<3.0 g/dl * Severely advanced patients according to Rotterdam criteria (TB \> ULN and albumin \<LLN) * INR \> 1.3 due to altered hepatic function * CPK \> 2 x ULN * Screening serum creatinine \> 1.5 mg/dl * Significant renal disease, including nephritic syndrome, chronic kidney disease (defined as patients with markers of kidney failure damage or eGFR \< 60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) calculated by Modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) * Platelet count \< 150 x 10\^3/μL * AFP \> 20 ng/mL with 4-phase liver CT or MRI imaging suggesting presence of liver cancer * Known hypersensitivity to the investigational product or to any of the formulation excipients of the elafibranor or placebo tablet Mental instability or incompetence, such that the validity of informed consent or ability to be compliant with the study is uncertain
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on Cholestasis Response at Week 52 | At Week 52 | Cholestasis response was defined as alkaline phosphatase (ALP) \< 1.67 x upper limit of normal (ULN) and total bilirubin (TB) \<= ULN and ALP decrease from baseline \>= 15% at Week 52 and based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced intercurrent events (ICEs) (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Key Secondary Endpoint: Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on ALP Normalization at Week 52 | At Week 52 | Response to treatment based on normalization of ALP at Week 52 was defined as percentage of participants with ALP =\<1.0× ULN and based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. |
| Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 52 | Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and Week 52 | The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake). |
| Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch NRS Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 24 | Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and Week 24 | The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered PRO questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake). |
| Change From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52 | Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of ALP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Percentage of Participants With ALP Response From Baseline at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | ALP response was defined as ALP decrease from baseline \>= 10%; ALP decrease from baseline \>= 20% and ALP decrease from baseline \>= 40% at Week 52 and based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 1.5x ULN, ALP Decrease From Baseline >= 40% and TB =<ULN at Week 52 | At Week 52 | Response to treatment was according to ALP \< 1.5x ULN, ALP decrease from baseline \>= 40% and TB =\<ULN at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 3x ULN, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) < 2x ULN and TB =< 1 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) (Paris I) at Week 52 | At Week 52 | Response to treatment was according to ALP \< 3x ULN, AST \< 2x ULN and TB =\< 1 mg/dL (Paris I) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP =< 1.5x ULN, AST =< 1.5x ULN and TB =< 1 mg/dL (Paris II) at Week 52 | At Week 52 | Response to treatment was according to ALP =\< 1.5x ULN, AST =\< 1.5x ULN and TB =\< 1 mg/dL (Paris II) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB Decrease of 15% Change From Baseline at Week 52 | At Week 52 | Response to treatment was according to TB decrease of 15% change from baseline at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Normalization of TB (TB =< ULN) and/or Albumin (ALB >= Lower Limit of Normal [LLN]) (Rotterdam) at Week 52 | At Week 52 | Response to treatment was according to TB (TB =\< ULN) and/or albumin (ALB \>= LLN) (Rotterdam) at week 52. Participant was considered as responder at Week 52 only if total bilirubin and albumin were normal. The endpoint was analyzed in participants with abnormal total bilirubin (TB \> ULN) or albumin (ALB \< LLN) at baseline. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB ≤0.6 x ULN at Week 52 | At Week 52 | Response to treatment was according to TB ≤0.6 x ULN at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP ≤1.67 x ULN and TB ≤1 mg/dL (Momah/ Lindor) at Week 52 | At Week 52 | Response to treatment was according to ALP ≤1.67 x ULN and TB ≤1 mg/dL (Momah/ Lindor) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to no Worsening of TB at Week 52 | At Week 52 | Response to treatment was according to no worsening of TB, which was defined as level of TB \<ULN or no increase from baseline of more than 0.1 x ULN at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Complete Biochemical Response at Week 52 | At Week 52 | Response to treatment according to complete biochemical response which was defined as \<= ULN values of ALP, TB, AST, ALT and ALB, and international normalized ratio (INR) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. |
| PBC 5-, 10- and 15-year Risk Scores Based on United Kingdom (UK)-PBC Score at Week 52 | At Week 52 | The UK-PBC risk score was defined by the mean percentage risk that a PBC participant treated with UDCA would develop liver failure requiring liver transplantation in 5, 10, and 15 years from diagnosis. It is calculated from the following equation at week 52 as follows: UK-PBC score = 0.0287854\*(alpEPxULN-1.722136304) - 0.0422873\*(\[{altastEP x ULN/10}\^-1\] - 8.675729006) + 1.4199 \* (LN(bilEPxULN /10)+2.709607778) - 1.960303\*(alb x LLN -1.17673001)-0.4161954\*(plt x LLN -1.873564875). The survival S(t) for any given participants was then calculated by S(t) = S0(t) exp(UK-PBC score). Here, alpEP x ULN=ALP /Upper Level Normal ALP at the timepoint, altastEPxULN=(ALT, AST or TA) /upper level normal of the value at the timepoint, bilEP x ULN=bilirubin /upper level normal bilirubin at the timepoint, alb x LLN=alb /alb lower level normal at baseline and plt x LLN=plt/plt lower level normal at baseline. Lower UK-PBC score predicts lower risk and better prognosis. |
| Global PBC Study Group (GLOBE) Score at Week 52 | At Week 52 | The GLOBE score was a validated risk assessment tool providing an estimate of transplant-free survival for participants with PBC. It was developed by the Global PBC Study Group using Cox regression model on over 4,000 participants with PBC. It is calculated from the following equation at week 52 as follows: GLOBE score = 0.044378 \* age at start of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy + 0.93982 \* LN (TB x ULN) + 0.335648 \* LN (ALP x ULN) - 2.266708 \* ALB x LLN - 0.002581 \* platelet count per 10\^9/L) + 1.216865; where TB x ULN = bilirubin/ULN at the timepoint, ALP x ULN = ALP/ULN at the timepoint, ALB x LLN = ALB/LLN at the timepoint, platelet count per 10\^9/L = platelet count per 10\^9/L at the timepoint. The Lower GLOBE PBC score predicts lower risk and better prognosis. |
| Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by AST, ALT, GGT, 5'-NT, and fractionated ALP (hepatic) (H1 and H2). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Total and Conjugated Bilirubin at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by total and conjugated bilirubin. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Albumin at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by albumin. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by INR at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by INR. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | Biomarkers of inflammation were assessed as measured by hsCRP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Fibrinogen and Haptoglobin at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | Biomarkers of inflammation were assessed as measured by fibrinogen and haptoglobin. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | Biomarkers of inflammation were assessed as measured by TNF-alpha. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Immune Response as Measured by Immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | Immune response was assessed as measured by IgG and IgM. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | Biomarkers and non-invasive measures of hepatic fibrosis were assessed as measured by ELF: hyaluronic acid \[HA\], type 2 procollagen peptide \[PIINP\], tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1\[TIMP-1\]) and PAI-1. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | Biomarkers and non-invasive measures of hepatic fibrosis were assessed as measured by CK-18 (M30 and M65). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-beta) at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | Biomarkers and non-invasive measures of hepatic fibrosis were assessed as measured by TGF-beta. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Liver Stiffness Measured by Transient Elastography (TE) at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | FibroScan® TE device (Echosens, Paris, France) is a non-invasive technique used to measure liver stiffness, which correlated with fibrosis. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol and triglycerides (TG). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of FPG. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment bile acids and biomarkers of bile acid synthesis. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured by 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of bile acids and biomarkers of bile acid synthesis as measured by C4. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured Fibroblast Growth Factor 19 at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment bile acids and biomarkers of bile acid synthesis as measured by Fibroblast Growth Factor 19. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and at Week 24 and Week 52 | The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered PRO questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Response to PBC Worst Itch NRS was according to clinically meaningful change at least 30% reduction; one point, two points or three points decrease in score from baseline in participants with a baseline NRS score ≥4. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake). |
| Percentage of Participants With no Worsening of Pruritus as Measured by the PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and at Week 24 and Week 54 | The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered PRO questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake). A worsening of Pruritus was defined by a positive change from baseline in PBC Worst Itch NRS score greater than 2 at week 24 and 52. |
| Change From Baseline in 5-D Itch at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | The 5-D Itch scale is a questionnaire that has been validated in several different diseases. It assesses symptoms in terms of 5 domains: duration: score range 1 (less than 6 hours) to 5 (all day); degree: score range 1 (not present) to 5 (unbearable); duration: score range 1 (less than 6 hours) and 5 (all day); direction: score range 1(completely resolved) and 5 (getting worse); disability: score range 1 (never affects or not applicable) and 5 (delays falling asleep and frequently wakes up at night or always affects this activity) and distribution: where the question was to mark where itching is present in body parts over the last two weeks. Participants rated their symptoms over preceding 2-week period on a 1 to 5 scale, with 5 being the most affected. The 5-D Itch total score ranged between 5 (no pruritus) and 25 (most severe pruritus). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline= last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 7a at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | The PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a consists of seven items that measure both the experience of fatigue and the interference of fatigue on daily activities over the past week. Participants completed the PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a and answered following questions on a scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always) : "How often did you feel tired"; "How often did you experience extreme exhaustion"; "How often did you run out of energy"; "How often did your fatigue limit you at work"; "How often were you too tired to think clearly"; "How often were you too tired to take a bath or shower" and 'How often did you have enough energy to exercise strenuously". T-score values include mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. The PROMIS Fatigue T-score ranged from 29.4 (best) to 83.2 (worst). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | The ESS is a short, self-administered questionnaire that consists of 8 questions asking to rate how likely it is to fall asleep in everyday situations (each question can be scored from 0 to 3 points; '0' indicates no chance of dozing and '3' indicates high chance of dozing). It provides a total score which has been shown to relate to the participant's level of daytime sleepiness (total score range 0 \[no sleepiness\] to 24 points \[significant sleepiness\]). The total score is the sum of all item scores and ranged from 0 (best) to 24 (worst). Higher scores indicated more chances of sleepiness. Participants were asked to complete the ESS with regard to the level of sleepiness they experienced over approximately the past 7 days. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | PBC-40 assess symptoms across 6 domains:symptoms,itch,fatigue,cognitive,emotional and social. Participants responded on verbal response scale,depending on section options range from 'never'/'not at all'/'strongly disagree' to 'always'/'very much'/'strongly agree'.5 items (3/3 in itch domain and 2/10 in social domain)also included a 'does not apply' option.Domains:Symptoms(7 questions)score range 7-35,Itch(3 questions)score range 3-15,Fatigue(11 questions)score range 11-55,Cognitive(6 questions)score range 6-30,Emotional(3 questions)score range 3-15,Social(10 questions)score range 10-50.Score for each domain was provided(total score was not calculated),with each verbal response scale correlating to score of 1-5 per item(0-5 on items with a 'does not apply' option);5=most affected.Individual item scores are summed to give total domain score.Higher scores=worse outcomes.PBC-40 had 4-week recall period.Baseline=last non-missing value on or before first dose of randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Health Utility as Measured by the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | The EQ-5D-5L is a 6-item, standardized questionnaire that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression, and overall health state. The visual analog scale (VAS) of EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is numbered from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicated better outcomes. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scanning at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | DEXA scanning (hip and lumbar) was performed in participants to assess bone mineral density (femoral neck, lumbar and total hip). T-scores were calculated based on actual measured bone density value. The T-score compared a participant's bone density against that of a healthy 30-year-old adult. T-scores were used to determine primary osteoporosis, which exists on its own without any other cause and were divided into 3 categories: low risk, medium risk, and high risk (osteoporosis). T-scores measure the number of minerals in a participant's bone. A participant's level of bone loss was compared to that of a typical, healthy 30-year-old adult. A score ≥-1.0 indicates low risk, medium risk is a score between-2.5 and -1.0, and a high risk/osteoporosis is a score ≤-2.5. A positive change in T-score indicates an improvement in bone mineral density. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Carboxy Terminal Crosslinked Telopeptides of Type 1 Collagen [CTX] at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of serum markers of bone turnover, CTX. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Change From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Type 1 Procollagen Peptide [P1NP]) at Week 52 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52 | Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of serum markers of bone turnover, P1NP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication. |
| Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Outcomes | From Day 1 up to Week 52 | Onset of clinical outcomes were described as a composite endpoint composed of the following: model for end stage liver disease sodium (MELD-Na) \>14 for participants with baseline MELD-Na \<12; liver transplant; uncontrolled ascites requiring treatment; hospitalization for new onset or recurrence of any including, variceal bleed, hepatic encephalopathy defined as West-Haven score of 2 or more and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; and death. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) | TEAEs were collected from the start of study treatment administration (Day 1) up to DCO date of 01 June 2023, approximately 980 days. | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant who was administered an investigational product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. A TEAE was defined as any AE with onset during TEAE assessment period, or any event started prior to first dose of treatment and worsened or became serious during the TEAE assessment period. An SAE was any AE that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital abnormality/birth defect. An AESI was an AE that might not be serious but was of special importance to a particular treatment or class. |
| Plasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007 | Week 4: pre-dose, 0.5 hour, 1.5 hours, between 2-3 hours, 4 hours and 6 hours post-dose | Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to evaluate plasma concentration of Elafibranor and its metabolite GFT1007. |
Countries
Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Italy, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States
Contacts
Ipsen
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This Phase III, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled study followed by an open-label long-term extension (LTE) was conducted in participants with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) at 82 sites in 14 countries (Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Italy, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, and United States). First participant was recruited on 24 September 2020 and data cut-off (DCO) date was 01 June 2023.
Pre-assignment details
This study consisted of a 2- to 12-week screening period, a 52- to 104-week DB period consisting of a 52-week common DB period followed by a variable DB period of up to 52 weeks in duration; a 4- to 5-year LTE period; and a 4-week safety follow-up period after the last dose of study treatment. A total of 161 participants were randomized in 2:1 ratio to receive once daily elafibranor or placebo. Results are presented up to DCO of 01 June 2023.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg Participants received elafibranor 80 mg orally once daily before breakfast during the DB period (maximum observed exposure= 104 weeks). | 108 |
| Placebo Participants received placebo matched to elafibranor orally once daily before breakfast during the DB period (maximum observed exposure= 106 weeks). | 53 |
| Total | 161 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Elafibranor 80 mg | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 57.5 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 | 56.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3 | 57.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Not Reported | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 101 Participants | 46 Participants | 147 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 102 Participants | 52 Participants | 154 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 6 Participants | 1 Participants | 7 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 2 / 108 | 0 / 53 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 103 / 108 | 47 / 53 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 11 / 108 | 7 / 53 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on Cholestasis Response at Week 52
Cholestasis response was defined as alkaline phosphatase (ALP) \< 1.67 x upper limit of normal (ULN) and total bilirubin (TB) \<= ULN and ALP decrease from baseline \>= 15% at Week 52 and based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced intercurrent events (ICEs) (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Time frame: At Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on Cholestasis Response at Week 52 | 50.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on Cholestasis Response at Week 52 | 3.8 Percentage of participants |
Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured by 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) at Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of bile acids and biomarkers of bile acid synthesis as measured by C4. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured by 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) at Week 52 | -7.288 mcg/L | Standard Deviation 16.779 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured by 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) at Week 52 | -4.044 mcg/L | Standard Deviation 12.995 |
Change From Baseline in 5-D Itch at Week 52
The 5-D Itch scale is a questionnaire that has been validated in several different diseases. It assesses symptoms in terms of 5 domains: duration: score range 1 (less than 6 hours) to 5 (all day); degree: score range 1 (not present) to 5 (unbearable); duration: score range 1 (less than 6 hours) and 5 (all day); direction: score range 1(completely resolved) and 5 (getting worse); disability: score range 1 (never affects or not applicable) and 5 (delays falling asleep and frequently wakes up at night or always affects this activity) and distribution: where the question was to mark where itching is present in body parts over the last two weeks. Participants rated their symptoms over preceding 2-week period on a 1 to 5 scale, with 5 being the most affected. The 5-D Itch total score ranged between 5 (no pruritus) and 25 (most severe pruritus). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline= last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in 5-D Itch at Week 52 | -1.9 Scores on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in 5-D Itch at Week 52 | -0.6 Scores on a scale |
Change From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of ALP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52 | Week 13 | -131.8 Units per Liter (U/L) | Standard Deviation 74.6 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52 | Week 39 | -134.7 Units per Liter (U/L) | Standard Deviation 89.8 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52 | Week 26 | -126.2 Units per Liter (U/L) | Standard Deviation 85.5 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52 | Week 52 | -117.7 Units per Liter (U/L) | Standard Deviation 96.5 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52 | Week 4 | -116.4 Units per Liter (U/L) | Standard Deviation 63.1 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52 | Week 52 | -8.8 Units per Liter (U/L) | Standard Deviation 91.2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52 | Week 4 | -14.3 Units per Liter (U/L) | Standard Deviation 92.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52 | Week 13 | -19.1 Units per Liter (U/L) | Standard Deviation 78.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52 | Week 26 | -6.0 Units per Liter (U/L) | Standard Deviation 75.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52 | Week 39 | -20.0 Units per Liter (U/L) | Standard Deviation 90.1 |
Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured Fibroblast Growth Factor 19 at Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment bile acids and biomarkers of bile acid synthesis as measured by Fibroblast Growth Factor 19. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured Fibroblast Growth Factor 19 at Week 52 | -12.89 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 80.24 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured Fibroblast Growth Factor 19 at Week 52 | 54.54 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 343.47 |
Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment bile acids and biomarkers of bile acid synthesis. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 for each parameter are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Lithocholic acid | -0.010 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.047 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Chenodeoxycholic acid | 0.177 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.807 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Cholic acid | 0.156 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.656 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Deoxycholic acid | -0.027 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.288 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Glycochenodeoxycholic acid | -0.564 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 3.31 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Glycocholic acid | -0.370 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 2.422 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Glycodeoxycholic acid | -0.516 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 1.247 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Glycolithocholic acid | -0.0234 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.0762 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Taurochenodeoxycholic acid | -0.085 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 2.495 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Taurocholic acid | 0.070 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 2.059 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Taurodeoxycholic acid | -0.0828 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.4412 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Taurolithocholic acid | -0.0098 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.0424 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Taurodeoxycholic acid | -0.0343 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.3683 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Glycolithocholic acid | -0.0187 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.1768 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Glycodeoxycholic acid | -0.266 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 2.688 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Chenodeoxycholic acid | 0.100 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.527 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Taurocholic acid | 1.127 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 4.38 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Cholic acid | 0.027 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.337 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Lithocholic acid | -0.003 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.047 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Deoxycholic acid | -0.039 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Taurolithocholic acid | -0.0082 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.0684 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Glycochenodeoxycholic acid | 0.581 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 4.408 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Taurochenodeoxycholic acid | 0.857 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 3.048 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52 | Glycocholic acid | 2.253 µmol/L | Standard Deviation 12.291 |
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) at Week 52
Biomarkers and non-invasive measures of hepatic fibrosis were assessed as measured by CK-18 (M30 and M65). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 for each parameter are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) at Week 52 | CK-18 M30 | -70.71 Picomoles per liter (pmol/L) | Standard Deviation 444.31 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) at Week 52 | CK-18 M65 | -50.02 Picomoles per liter (pmol/L) | Standard Deviation 246.28 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) at Week 52 | CK-18 M30 | -5.39 Picomoles per liter (pmol/L) | Standard Deviation 334.22 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) at Week 52 | CK-18 M65 | -83.73 Picomoles per liter (pmol/L) | Standard Deviation 481.3 |
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52
Biomarkers and non-invasive measures of hepatic fibrosis were assessed as measured by ELF: hyaluronic acid \[HA\], type 2 procollagen peptide \[PIINP\], tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1\[TIMP-1\]) and PAI-1. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 for each parameter are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52 | HA | 7.93 Micrograms per liter (mcg/L) | Standard Deviation 80.35 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52 | PIINP | -2.79 Micrograms per liter (mcg/L) | Standard Deviation 32.55 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52 | TIMP-1 | -3.03 Micrograms per liter (mcg/L) | Standard Deviation 51.06 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52 | PAI-1 | 0.053 Micrograms per liter (mcg/L) | Standard Deviation 3.032 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52 | PAI-1 | 0.785 Micrograms per liter (mcg/L) | Standard Deviation 7.028 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52 | HA | 16.36 Micrograms per liter (mcg/L) | Standard Deviation 48.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52 | TIMP-1 | 23.26 Micrograms per liter (mcg/L) | Standard Deviation 65.03 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52 | PIINP | -5.60 Micrograms per liter (mcg/L) | Standard Deviation 20.03 |
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-beta) at Week 52
Biomarkers and non-invasive measures of hepatic fibrosis were assessed as measured by TGF-beta. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-beta) at Week 52 | 713.074 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 6553.956 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-beta) at Week 52 | -6172.360 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 3279.127 |
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Fibrinogen and Haptoglobin at Week 52
Biomarkers of inflammation were assessed as measured by fibrinogen and haptoglobin. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 for each parameter are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Fibrinogen and Haptoglobin at Week 52 | Fibrinogen | -1.002 g/L | Standard Deviation 1.303 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Fibrinogen and Haptoglobin at Week 52 | Haptoglobin | -0.185 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.407 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Fibrinogen and Haptoglobin at Week 52 | Fibrinogen | -0.776 g/L | Standard Deviation 1.265 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Fibrinogen and Haptoglobin at Week 52 | Haptoglobin | 0.023 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.302 |
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 52
Biomarkers of inflammation were assessed as measured by hsCRP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 52 | -1.38 mg/L | Standard Deviation 6.53 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 52 | 0.22 mg/L | Standard Deviation 2.64 |
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Week 52
Biomarkers of inflammation were assessed as measured by TNF-alpha. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Week 52 | -3.346 Picograms per milliliter (pg/mL) | Standard Deviation 15.442 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Week 52 | -0.224 Picograms per milliliter (pg/mL) | Standard Deviation 0.921 |
Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at Week 52
The ESS is a short, self-administered questionnaire that consists of 8 questions asking to rate how likely it is to fall asleep in everyday situations (each question can be scored from 0 to 3 points; '0' indicates no chance of dozing and '3' indicates high chance of dozing). It provides a total score which has been shown to relate to the participant's level of daytime sleepiness (total score range 0 \[no sleepiness\] to 24 points \[significant sleepiness\]). The total score is the sum of all item scores and ranged from 0 (best) to 24 (worst). Higher scores indicated more chances of sleepiness. Participants were asked to complete the ESS with regard to the level of sleepiness they experienced over approximately the past 7 days. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at Week 52 | -0.3 Scores on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at Week 52 | -0.5 Scores on a scale |
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of FPG. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52 | -0.267 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.861 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52 | 0.086 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.381 |
Change From Baseline in Health Utility as Measured by the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) at Week 52
The EQ-5D-5L is a 6-item, standardized questionnaire that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression, and overall health state. The visual analog scale (VAS) of EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is numbered from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicated better outcomes. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Health Utility as Measured by the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) at Week 52 | 2.5 Scores on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Health Utility as Measured by the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) at Week 52 | 1.6 Scores on a scale |
Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52
Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by AST, ALT, GGT, 5'-NT, and fractionated ALP (hepatic) (H1 and H2). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 for each parameter are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52 | AST | -2.5 U/L | Standard Deviation 17.8 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52 | ALT | -9.7 U/L | Standard Deviation 22.1 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52 | GGT | -44.0 U/L | Standard Deviation 95.6 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52 | 5'-NT | -3.63 U/L | Standard Deviation 5.4 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52 | Hepatic ALP H1 | -107.68 U/L | Standard Deviation 77.17 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52 | Hepatic ALP H2 | -11.76 U/L | Standard Deviation 14.67 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52 | Hepatic ALP H1 | -32.20 U/L | Standard Deviation 71.42 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52 | AST | -4.3 U/L | Standard Deviation 24.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52 | 5'-NT | -2.09 U/L | Standard Deviation 10.52 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52 | ALT | -6.3 U/L | Standard Deviation 26.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52 | Hepatic ALP H2 | -5.20 U/L | Standard Deviation 54.83 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52 | GGT | -17.3 U/L | Standard Deviation 112.7 |
Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Albumin at Week 52
Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by albumin. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Albumin at Week 52 | 1.0 Grams per liter (g/L) | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Albumin at Week 52 | -1.2 Grams per liter (g/L) | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by INR at Week 52
Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by INR. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by INR at Week 52 | 0.028 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.148 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by INR at Week 52 | 0.035 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.131 |
Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Total and Conjugated Bilirubin at Week 52
Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by total and conjugated bilirubin. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 for each parameter are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Total and Conjugated Bilirubin at Week 52 | Total Bilirubin | -0.67 Micromoles per liter (μmol/L) | Standard Deviation 3.18 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Total and Conjugated Bilirubin at Week 52 | Conjugated bilirubin | -0.09 Micromoles per liter (μmol/L) | Standard Deviation 1.98 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Total and Conjugated Bilirubin at Week 52 | Total Bilirubin | 0.87 Micromoles per liter (μmol/L) | Standard Deviation 4.29 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Total and Conjugated Bilirubin at Week 52 | Conjugated bilirubin | 0.61 Micromoles per liter (μmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.41 |
Change From Baseline in Immune Response as Measured by Immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM at Week 52
Immune response was assessed as measured by IgG and IgM. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 for each parameter are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Immune Response as Measured by Immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM at Week 52 | IgG | -0.423 g/L | Standard Deviation 1.591 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Immune Response as Measured by Immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM at Week 52 | IgM | -0.606 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.907 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Immune Response as Measured by Immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM at Week 52 | IgG | 0.298 g/L | Standard Deviation 1.159 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Immune Response as Measured by Immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM at Week 52 | IgM | 0.017 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.762 |
Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol and triglycerides (TG). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 for each parameter are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52 | LDL cholesterol | -0.428 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52 | VLDL cholesterol | -0.118 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.159 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52 | HDL cholesterol | 0.011 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.364 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52 | TG | -0.268 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52 | Total cholesterol | -0.532 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.91 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52 | TG | 0.031 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.343 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52 | Total cholesterol | -0.318 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 1.144 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52 | LDL cholesterol | -0.274 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 1.086 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52 | HDL cholesterol | -0.056 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.399 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52 | VLDL cholesterol | 0.015 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.156 |
Change From Baseline in Liver Stiffness Measured by Transient Elastography (TE) at Week 52
FibroScan® TE device (Echosens, Paris, France) is a non-invasive technique used to measure liver stiffness, which correlated with fibrosis. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Liver Stiffness Measured by Transient Elastography (TE) at Week 52 | -0.16 Kilopascal (kPa) | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Liver Stiffness Measured by Transient Elastography (TE) at Week 52 | 0.35 Kilopascal (kPa) | Standard Deviation 6.39 |
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 7a at Week 52
The PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a consists of seven items that measure both the experience of fatigue and the interference of fatigue on daily activities over the past week. Participants completed the PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a and answered following questions on a scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always) : How often did you feel tired; How often did you experience extreme exhaustion; How often did you run out of energy; How often did your fatigue limit you at work; How often were you too tired to think clearly; How often were you too tired to take a bath or shower and 'How often did you have enough energy to exercise strenuously. T-score values include mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. The PROMIS Fatigue T-score ranged from 29.4 (best) to 83.2 (worst). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 7a at Week 52 | -2.45 T-score |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 7a at Week 52 | -1.23 T-score |
Change From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52
PBC-40 assess symptoms across 6 domains:symptoms,itch,fatigue,cognitive,emotional and social. Participants responded on verbal response scale,depending on section options range from 'never'/'not at all'/'strongly disagree' to 'always'/'very much'/'strongly agree'.5 items (3/3 in itch domain and 2/10 in social domain)also included a 'does not apply' option.Domains:Symptoms(7 questions)score range 7-35,Itch(3 questions)score range 3-15,Fatigue(11 questions)score range 11-55,Cognitive(6 questions)score range 6-30,Emotional(3 questions)score range 3-15,Social(10 questions)score range 10-50.Score for each domain was provided(total score was not calculated),with each verbal response scale correlating to score of 1-5 per item(0-5 on items with a 'does not apply' option);5=most affected.Individual item scores are summed to give total domain score.Higher scores=worse outcomes.PBC-40 had 4-week recall period.Baseline=last non-missing value on or before first dose of randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52 | Symptoms | 0.2 Scores on a scale |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52 | Itch | -1.4 Scores on a scale |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52 | Fatigue | -1.5 Scores on a scale |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52 | Cognitive | -0.6 Scores on a scale |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52 | Emotional | -0.8 Scores on a scale |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52 | Social | -1.1 Scores on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52 | Emotional | -0.6 Scores on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52 | Symptoms | -0.9 Scores on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52 | Cognitive | -0.7 Scores on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52 | Itch | -0.2 Scores on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52 | Social | -0.4 Scores on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52 | Fatigue | -1.2 Scores on a scale |
Change From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Carboxy Terminal Crosslinked Telopeptides of Type 1 Collagen [CTX] at Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of serum markers of bone turnover, CTX. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Carboxy Terminal Crosslinked Telopeptides of Type 1 Collagen [CTX] at Week 52 | 36.5 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 212.6 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Carboxy Terminal Crosslinked Telopeptides of Type 1 Collagen [CTX] at Week 52 | 44.5 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 129.7 |
Change From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Type 1 Procollagen Peptide [P1NP]) at Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of serum markers of bone turnover, P1NP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Type 1 Procollagen Peptide [P1NP]) at Week 52 | -2.79 mcg/L | Standard Deviation 32.55 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Type 1 Procollagen Peptide [P1NP]) at Week 52 | -5.60 mcg/L | Standard Deviation 20.03 |
Change From Baseline in T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scanning at Week 52
DEXA scanning (hip and lumbar) was performed in participants to assess bone mineral density (femoral neck, lumbar and total hip). T-scores were calculated based on actual measured bone density value. The T-score compared a participant's bone density against that of a healthy 30-year-old adult. T-scores were used to determine primary osteoporosis, which exists on its own without any other cause and were divided into 3 categories: low risk, medium risk, and high risk (osteoporosis). T-scores measure the number of minerals in a participant's bone. A participant's level of bone loss was compared to that of a typical, healthy 30-year-old adult. A score ≥-1.0 indicates low risk, medium risk is a score between-2.5 and -1.0, and a high risk/osteoporosis is a score ≤-2.5. A positive change in T-score indicates an improvement in bone mineral density. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 for each parameter are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scanning at Week 52 | Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density T-score | -0.016 T-score | Standard Deviation 0.402 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scanning at Week 52 | Lumbar Bone Mineral Density T-score | -0.006 T-score | Standard Deviation 0.487 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Change From Baseline in T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scanning at Week 52 | Total Hip Bone Mineral Density T-score | 0.039 T-score | Standard Deviation 0.529 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scanning at Week 52 | Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density T-score | -0.111 T-score | Standard Deviation 0.533 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scanning at Week 52 | Lumbar Bone Mineral Density T-score | -0.022 T-score | Standard Deviation 0.405 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scanning at Week 52 | Total Hip Bone Mineral Density T-score | -0.371 T-score | Standard Deviation 0.618 |
Global PBC Study Group (GLOBE) Score at Week 52
The GLOBE score was a validated risk assessment tool providing an estimate of transplant-free survival for participants with PBC. It was developed by the Global PBC Study Group using Cox regression model on over 4,000 participants with PBC. It is calculated from the following equation at week 52 as follows: GLOBE score = 0.044378 \* age at start of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy + 0.93982 \* LN (TB x ULN) + 0.335648 \* LN (ALP x ULN) - 2.266708 \* ALB x LLN - 0.002581 \* platelet count per 10\^9/L) + 1.216865; where TB x ULN = bilirubin/ULN at the timepoint, ALP x ULN = ALP/ULN at the timepoint, ALB x LLN = ALB/LLN at the timepoint, platelet count per 10\^9/L = platelet count per 10\^9/L at the timepoint. The Lower GLOBE PBC score predicts lower risk and better prognosis.
Time frame: At Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Global PBC Study Group (GLOBE) Score at Week 52 | -1.03 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Placebo | Global PBC Study Group (GLOBE) Score at Week 52 | -0.62 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch NRS Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 24
The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered PRO questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake).
Time frame: Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and Week 24
Population: The Pruritus ITT population included all participants from the ITT analysis set with baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS score ≥4. Only those participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch NRS Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 24 | -1.598 Scores on a scale |
| Placebo | Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch NRS Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 24 | -1.255 Scores on a scale |
Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 52
The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake).
Time frame: Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and Week 52
Population: The Pruritus ITT population included all participants from the ITT analysis set with baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS score ≥4. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 52 | -1.930 Scores on a scale |
| Placebo | Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 52 | -1.146 Scores on a scale |
Key Secondary Endpoint: Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on ALP Normalization at Week 52
Response to treatment based on normalization of ALP at Week 52 was defined as percentage of participants with ALP =\<1.0× ULN and based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Time frame: At Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Key Secondary Endpoint: Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on ALP Normalization at Week 52 | 14.8 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Key Secondary Endpoint: Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on ALP Normalization at Week 52 | 0 Percentage of participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant who was administered an investigational product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. A TEAE was defined as any AE with onset during TEAE assessment period, or any event started prior to first dose of treatment and worsened or became serious during the TEAE assessment period. An SAE was any AE that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital abnormality/birth defect. An AESI was an AE that might not be serious but was of special importance to a particular treatment or class.
Time frame: TEAEs were collected from the start of study treatment administration (Day 1) up to DCO date of 01 June 2023, approximately 980 days.
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered at least one dose of DB study drug irrespective of the treatment received.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) | TEAEs | 104 Participants |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) | TESAEs | 11 Participants |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) | AESIs | 32 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) | TEAEs | 48 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) | TESAEs | 7 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) | AESIs | 14 Participants |
PBC 5-, 10- and 15-year Risk Scores Based on United Kingdom (UK)-PBC Score at Week 52
The UK-PBC risk score was defined by the mean percentage risk that a PBC participant treated with UDCA would develop liver failure requiring liver transplantation in 5, 10, and 15 years from diagnosis. It is calculated from the following equation at week 52 as follows: UK-PBC score = 0.0287854\*(alpEPxULN-1.722136304) - 0.0422873\*(\[{altastEP x ULN/10}\^-1\] - 8.675729006) + 1.4199 \* (LN(bilEPxULN /10)+2.709607778) - 1.960303\*(alb x LLN -1.17673001)-0.4161954\*(plt x LLN -1.873564875). The survival S(t) for any given participants was then calculated by S(t) = S0(t) exp(UK-PBC score). Here, alpEP x ULN=ALP /Upper Level Normal ALP at the timepoint, altastEPxULN=(ALT, AST or TA) /upper level normal of the value at the timepoint, bilEP x ULN=bilirubin /upper level normal bilirubin at the timepoint, alb x LLN=alb /alb lower level normal at baseline and plt x LLN=plt/plt lower level normal at baseline. Lower UK-PBC score predicts lower risk and better prognosis.
Time frame: At Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | PBC 5-, 10- and 15-year Risk Scores Based on United Kingdom (UK)-PBC Score at Week 52 | UK PBC 5-year risk score | 0.0102 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.0126 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | PBC 5-, 10- and 15-year Risk Scores Based on United Kingdom (UK)-PBC Score at Week 52 | UK PBC 10-year risk score | 0.0330 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.0393 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | PBC 5-, 10- and 15-year Risk Scores Based on United Kingdom (UK)-PBC Score at Week 52 | UK PBC 15-year risk score | 0.0593 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.067 |
| Placebo | PBC 5-, 10- and 15-year Risk Scores Based on United Kingdom (UK)-PBC Score at Week 52 | UK PBC 5-year risk score | 0.0146 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.0264 |
| Placebo | PBC 5-, 10- and 15-year Risk Scores Based on United Kingdom (UK)-PBC Score at Week 52 | UK PBC 10-year risk score | 0.0454 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.0731 |
| Placebo | PBC 5-, 10- and 15-year Risk Scores Based on United Kingdom (UK)-PBC Score at Week 52 | UK PBC 15-year risk score | 0.0786 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1109 |
Percentage of Participants With ALP Response From Baseline at Week 52
ALP response was defined as ALP decrease from baseline \>= 10%; ALP decrease from baseline \>= 20% and ALP decrease from baseline \>= 40% at Week 52 and based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With ALP Response From Baseline at Week 52 | ALP response >= 10% decrease from baseline | 75.5 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With ALP Response From Baseline at Week 52 | ALP response >= 20% decrease from baseline | 69.8 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With ALP Response From Baseline at Week 52 | ALP response >= 40% decrease from baseline | 54.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ALP Response From Baseline at Week 52 | ALP response >= 10% decrease from baseline | 22.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ALP Response From Baseline at Week 52 | ALP response >= 20% decrease from baseline | 5.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With ALP Response From Baseline at Week 52 | ALP response >= 40% decrease from baseline | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With no Worsening of Pruritus as Measured by the PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52
The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered PRO questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake). A worsening of Pruritus was defined by a positive change from baseline in PBC Worst Itch NRS score greater than 2 at week 24 and 52.
Time frame: Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and at Week 24 and Week 54
Population: The Pruritus ITT population included all participants from the ITT analysis set with baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS score ≥4.. Only those participants with data collected at Week 24 and Week 54 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With no Worsening of Pruritus as Measured by the PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 24 | 89.2 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With no Worsening of Pruritus as Measured by the PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 52 | 76.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With no Worsening of Pruritus as Measured by the PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 24 | 86.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With no Worsening of Pruritus as Measured by the PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 52 | 82.6 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Outcomes
Onset of clinical outcomes were described as a composite endpoint composed of the following: model for end stage liver disease sodium (MELD-Na) \>14 for participants with baseline MELD-Na \<12; liver transplant; uncontrolled ascites requiring treatment; hospitalization for new onset or recurrence of any including, variceal bleed, hepatic encephalopathy defined as West-Haven score of 2 or more and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; and death.
Time frame: From Day 1 up to Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Outcomes | Liver transplant | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Outcomes | Hospitalization for new onset or recurrence of Hepatic encephalopathy | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Outcomes | Uncontrolled ascites requiring treatment | 0.9 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Outcomes | Hospitalization for new onset or recurrence of Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Outcomes | Meld-Na > 14 while baseline Meld-Na < 12 | 0.9 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Outcomes | Hospitalization for new onset or recurrence of variceal bleed | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Outcomes | Death | 0.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Outcomes | Liver transplant | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Outcomes | Meld-Na > 14 while baseline Meld-Na < 12 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Outcomes | Uncontrolled ascites requiring treatment | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Outcomes | Hospitalization for new onset or recurrence of variceal bleed | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Outcomes | Hospitalization for new onset or recurrence of Hepatic encephalopathy | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Outcomes | Hospitalization for new onset or recurrence of Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Outcomes | Death | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52
The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered PRO questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Response to PBC Worst Itch NRS was according to clinically meaningful change at least 30% reduction; one point, two points or three points decrease in score from baseline in participants with a baseline NRS score ≥4. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake).
Time frame: Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and at Week 24 and Week 52
Population: The Pruritus ITT population included all participants from the ITT analysis set with baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS score ≥4. Only those participants with data collected at Weeks 24 and 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 24: 30% reduction from baseline | 43.6 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 52: 30% reduction from baseline | 55.6 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 24: One-point decrease from baseline | 53.8 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 52: One-point decrease from baseline | 61.1 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 24: Two-point decrease from baseline | 38.5 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 52: Two-point decrease from baseline | 47.2 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 24: Three-point decrease from baseline | 28.2 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 52: Three-point decrease from baseline | 41.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 52: Three-point decrease from baseline | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 24: 30% reduction from baseline | 28.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 24: Two-point decrease from baseline | 28.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 52: 30% reduction from baseline | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 24: Three-point decrease from baseline | 19.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 24: One-point decrease from baseline | 42.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 52: Two-point decrease from baseline | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52 | Week 52: One-point decrease from baseline | 38.9 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 1.5x ULN, ALP Decrease From Baseline >= 40% and TB =<ULN at Week 52
Response to treatment was according to ALP \< 1.5x ULN, ALP decrease from baseline \>= 40% and TB =\<ULN at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: At Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 1.5x ULN, ALP Decrease From Baseline >= 40% and TB =<ULN at Week 52 | 37.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 1.5x ULN, ALP Decrease From Baseline >= 40% and TB =<ULN at Week 52 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP =< 1.5x ULN, AST =< 1.5x ULN and TB =< 1 mg/dL (Paris II) at Week 52
Response to treatment was according to ALP =\< 1.5x ULN, AST =\< 1.5x ULN and TB =\< 1 mg/dL (Paris II) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Time frame: At Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP =< 1.5x ULN, AST =< 1.5x ULN and TB =< 1 mg/dL (Paris II) at Week 52 | 43.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP =< 1.5x ULN, AST =< 1.5x ULN and TB =< 1 mg/dL (Paris II) at Week 52 | 5.7 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP ≤1.67 x ULN and TB ≤1 mg/dL (Momah/ Lindor) at Week 52
Response to treatment was according to ALP ≤1.67 x ULN and TB ≤1 mg/dL (Momah/ Lindor) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Time frame: At Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP ≤1.67 x ULN and TB ≤1 mg/dL (Momah/ Lindor) at Week 52 | 51.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP ≤1.67 x ULN and TB ≤1 mg/dL (Momah/ Lindor) at Week 52 | 9.4 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 3x ULN, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) < 2x ULN and TB =< 1 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) (Paris I) at Week 52
Response to treatment was according to ALP \< 3x ULN, AST \< 2x ULN and TB =\< 1 mg/dL (Paris I) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Time frame: At Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 3x ULN, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) < 2x ULN and TB =< 1 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) (Paris I) at Week 52 | 68.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 3x ULN, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) < 2x ULN and TB =< 1 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) (Paris I) at Week 52 | 47.2 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Complete Biochemical Response at Week 52
Response to treatment according to complete biochemical response which was defined as \<= ULN values of ALP, TB, AST, ALT and ALB, and international normalized ratio (INR) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Time frame: At Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Complete Biochemical Response at Week 52 | 9.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Complete Biochemical Response at Week 52 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Normalization of TB (TB =< ULN) and/or Albumin (ALB >= Lower Limit of Normal [LLN]) (Rotterdam) at Week 52
Response to treatment was according to TB (TB =\< ULN) and/or albumin (ALB \>= LLN) (Rotterdam) at week 52. Participant was considered as responder at Week 52 only if total bilirubin and albumin were normal. The endpoint was analyzed in participants with abnormal total bilirubin (TB \> ULN) or albumin (ALB \< LLN) at baseline. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Time frame: At Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Normalization of TB (TB =< ULN) and/or Albumin (ALB >= Lower Limit of Normal [LLN]) (Rotterdam) at Week 52 | TB (TB =< ULN) | 25.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Normalization of TB (TB =< ULN) and/or Albumin (ALB >= Lower Limit of Normal [LLN]) (Rotterdam) at Week 52 | TB (TB =< ULN) | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to no Worsening of TB at Week 52
Response to treatment was according to no worsening of TB, which was defined as level of TB \<ULN or no increase from baseline of more than 0.1 x ULN at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Time frame: At Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to no Worsening of TB at Week 52 | 85.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to no Worsening of TB at Week 52 | 83.0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB ≤0.6 x ULN at Week 52
Response to treatment was according to TB ≤0.6 x ULN at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Time frame: At Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB ≤0.6 x ULN at Week 52 | 74.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB ≤0.6 x ULN at Week 52 | 77.4 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB Decrease of 15% Change From Baseline at Week 52
Response to treatment was according to TB decrease of 15% change from baseline at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Time frame: At Week 52
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB Decrease of 15% Change From Baseline at Week 52 | 31.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB Decrease of 15% Change From Baseline at Week 52 | 22.6 Percentage of participants |
Plasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to evaluate plasma concentration of Elafibranor and its metabolite GFT1007.
Time frame: Week 4: pre-dose, 0.5 hour, 1.5 hours, between 2-3 hours, 4 hours and 6 hours post-dose
Population: Pharmacokinetics Analysis Set included all participants who were administered at least one dose of elafibranor and have at least one post-dose PK sample. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Plasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007 | Elafibranor: Week 4: Pre-dose | 92.7 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.9 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Plasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007 | Elafibranor: Week 4: 0.5 hour post-dose | 408.2 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 104.1 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Plasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007 | Elafibranor: Week 4: 1.5 hours post-dose | 281.7 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 66.1 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Plasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007 | Elafibranor: Week 4: between 2-3 hours post-dose | 182.0 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 67.8 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Plasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007 | Elafibranor: Week 4: 4 hours post-dose | 127.7 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.7 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Plasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007 | Elafibranor: Week 4: 6 hours post-dose | 117.1 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 53.5 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Plasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007 | GFT1007: Week 4: Pre-dose | 77.3 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 85.6 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Plasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007 | GFT1007: Week 4: 0.5 hour post-dose | 894.6 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 150 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Plasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007 | GFT1007: Week 4: 1.5 hours post-dose | 1707.2 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.1 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Plasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007 | GFT1007: Week 4: between 2-3 hours post-dose | 1160.8 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 53.9 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Plasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007 | GFT1007: Week 4: 4 hours post-dose | 655.8 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 54.7 |
| Elafibranor 80 mg | Plasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007 | GFT1007: Week 4: 6 hours post-dose | 375.7 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 65.9 |