Skip to content

Study of Elafibranor in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC)

A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study and Open-label Long Term Extension to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Elafibranor 80 mg in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Ursodeoxycholic Acid

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04526665
Acronym
ELATIVE
Enrollment
161
Registered
2020-08-26
Start date
2020-09-24
Completion date
2028-12-01
Last updated
2026-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Biliary Cirrhosis

Keywords

Primary Biliary Cholangitis, PBC, Elafibranor

Brief summary

The participants of this study will have confirmed Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) with inadequate response or intolerance to ursodeoxycholic acid (which is a medication used in the management and treatment of cholestatic liver disease). PBC is a slowly progressive disease characterized by damage of the bile ducts in the liver, leading to a buildup of bile acids which causes further damage. The liver damage in PBC may lead to scarring (cirrhosis). PBC may also be associated with multiple symptoms. Many patients with PBC may require liver transplant or may die if the disease progresses and a liver transplant is not done. The main aim of this study is to determine if elafibranor (the study drug) is better than placebo (a dummy treatment) at decreasing the levels of a specific blood test (alkaline phosphatase) that provides information about participant's disease. This study will also evaluate the safety of long-term treatment with elafibranor, as well as the impact on symptoms such as itchy skin (pruritus) and tiredness (fatigue). This study has two main parts: Part 1 will compare a daily dose of elafibranor to a daily dose of placebo and will last between a minimum of one year and a maximum of two years. Part 2, all participants will receive elafibranor for a period of up to 5 years or until the total treatment duration (part 1 and part 2) reaches 6 years, whichever occurs first.

Interventions

Elafibranor 80mg daily

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo daily

Sponsors

Ipsen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

This is a double-blind (DB), randomized, placebo-controlled study followed by an open-label long term extension (LTE)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males or females age of 18 to 75 years (inclusive) * Definite or probable Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) diagnosis * Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥ 1.67x upper limit of normal (ULN) * Total bilirubin (TB) ≤ 2x ULN * Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for at least 12 months (stable dose ≥ 3 months) prior to screening, or unable to tolerate UDCA treatment (no UDCA for ≥ 3 months) prior to screening (per country standard-of-care dosing) * Must have PBC Worst Itch Numeric rating scale (NRS) collected prior to randomization * Females participating in this study must be of non-child bearing potential or must be using highly efficient contraception for the full duration of the study and for 1 month after the last drug intake

Exclusion criteria

* History or presence of other concomitant liver disease * Clinically significant hepatic decompensation, including patients with complications of cirrhosis/portal hypertension * Medical conditions that may cause non-hepatic increases in ALP (e.g., Paget's disease) or which may diminish life expectancy to \< 2 years, including known cancers * Patient has a positive test for HIV Type 1 or 2 at screening, or patient is known to have tested positive for HIV * Evidence of any other unstable or untreated clinically significant disease * History of alcohol abuse * For female patients: known pregnancy or lactating * Use of fibrates and glitazones within 2 months prior to screening * Use of Obeticholic acid (OCA), azathioprine, cyclosporine, methotrexate, mycophenolate, pentoxifylline, budesonide and other systemic corticosteroids (parenteral and oral chronic administration only); potentially hepatotoxic drugs * (including α-methyl-dopa, sodium valproic acid isoniazid, or nitrofurantoin) within 3 months prior to screening * Use of antibodies or immunotherapy directed against interleukins (ILs) or other cytokines or chemokines within 12 months prior to screening * For patients with previous exposure to OCA, OCA should be discontinued 3 months prior to screening * Patients who are currently participating in, plan to participate in, or have participated in an investigational drug study or medical device study containing active substance within 30 days or five half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to screening; for patients with previous exposure to seladelpar, seladelpar should be discontinued 3 months prior to screening * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) values \> 5 x ULN * For patients with AT or TB\>ULN at SV1, variability of AT or TB \> 40% (see section 3.5.1) * Albumin\<3.0 g/dl * Severely advanced patients according to Rotterdam criteria (TB \> ULN and albumin \<LLN) * INR \> 1.3 due to altered hepatic function * CPK \> 2 x ULN * Screening serum creatinine \> 1.5 mg/dl * Significant renal disease, including nephritic syndrome, chronic kidney disease (defined as patients with markers of kidney failure damage or eGFR \< 60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) calculated by Modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) * Platelet count \< 150 x 10\^3/μL * AFP \> 20 ng/mL with 4-phase liver CT or MRI imaging suggesting presence of liver cancer * Known hypersensitivity to the investigational product or to any of the formulation excipients of the elafibranor or placebo tablet Mental instability or incompetence, such that the validity of informed consent or ability to be compliant with the study is uncertain

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on Cholestasis Response at Week 52At Week 52Cholestasis response was defined as alkaline phosphatase (ALP) \< 1.67 x upper limit of normal (ULN) and total bilirubin (TB) \<= ULN and ALP decrease from baseline \>= 15% at Week 52 and based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced intercurrent events (ICEs) (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Key Secondary Endpoint: Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on ALP Normalization at Week 52At Week 52Response to treatment based on normalization of ALP at Week 52 was defined as percentage of participants with ALP =\<1.0× ULN and based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 52Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and Week 52The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake).
Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch NRS Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 24Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and Week 24The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered PRO questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake).
Change From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of ALP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Percentage of Participants With ALP Response From Baseline at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52ALP response was defined as ALP decrease from baseline \>= 10%; ALP decrease from baseline \>= 20% and ALP decrease from baseline \>= 40% at Week 52 and based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 1.5x ULN, ALP Decrease From Baseline >= 40% and TB =<ULN at Week 52At Week 52Response to treatment was according to ALP \< 1.5x ULN, ALP decrease from baseline \>= 40% and TB =\<ULN at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 3x ULN, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) < 2x ULN and TB =< 1 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) (Paris I) at Week 52At Week 52Response to treatment was according to ALP \< 3x ULN, AST \< 2x ULN and TB =\< 1 mg/dL (Paris I) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP =< 1.5x ULN, AST =< 1.5x ULN and TB =< 1 mg/dL (Paris II) at Week 52At Week 52Response to treatment was according to ALP =\< 1.5x ULN, AST =\< 1.5x ULN and TB =\< 1 mg/dL (Paris II) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB Decrease of 15% Change From Baseline at Week 52At Week 52Response to treatment was according to TB decrease of 15% change from baseline at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Normalization of TB (TB =< ULN) and/or Albumin (ALB >= Lower Limit of Normal [LLN]) (Rotterdam) at Week 52At Week 52Response to treatment was according to TB (TB =\< ULN) and/or albumin (ALB \>= LLN) (Rotterdam) at week 52. Participant was considered as responder at Week 52 only if total bilirubin and albumin were normal. The endpoint was analyzed in participants with abnormal total bilirubin (TB \> ULN) or albumin (ALB \< LLN) at baseline. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB ≤0.6 x ULN at Week 52At Week 52Response to treatment was according to TB ≤0.6 x ULN at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP ≤1.67 x ULN and TB ≤1 mg/dL (Momah/ Lindor) at Week 52At Week 52Response to treatment was according to ALP ≤1.67 x ULN and TB ≤1 mg/dL (Momah/ Lindor) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to no Worsening of TB at Week 52At Week 52Response to treatment was according to no worsening of TB, which was defined as level of TB \<ULN or no increase from baseline of more than 0.1 x ULN at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Complete Biochemical Response at Week 52At Week 52Response to treatment according to complete biochemical response which was defined as \<= ULN values of ALP, TB, AST, ALT and ALB, and international normalized ratio (INR) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
PBC 5-, 10- and 15-year Risk Scores Based on United Kingdom (UK)-PBC Score at Week 52At Week 52The UK-PBC risk score was defined by the mean percentage risk that a PBC participant treated with UDCA would develop liver failure requiring liver transplantation in 5, 10, and 15 years from diagnosis. It is calculated from the following equation at week 52 as follows: UK-PBC score = 0.0287854\*(alpEPxULN-1.722136304) - 0.0422873\*(\[{altastEP x ULN/10}\^-1\] - 8.675729006) + 1.4199 \* (LN(bilEPxULN /10)+2.709607778) - 1.960303\*(alb x LLN -1.17673001)-0.4161954\*(plt x LLN -1.873564875). The survival S(t) for any given participants was then calculated by S(t) = S0(t) exp(UK-PBC score). Here, alpEP x ULN=ALP /Upper Level Normal ALP at the timepoint, altastEPxULN=(ALT, AST or TA) /upper level normal of the value at the timepoint, bilEP x ULN=bilirubin /upper level normal bilirubin at the timepoint, alb x LLN=alb /alb lower level normal at baseline and plt x LLN=plt/plt lower level normal at baseline. Lower UK-PBC score predicts lower risk and better prognosis.
Global PBC Study Group (GLOBE) Score at Week 52At Week 52The GLOBE score was a validated risk assessment tool providing an estimate of transplant-free survival for participants with PBC. It was developed by the Global PBC Study Group using Cox regression model on over 4,000 participants with PBC. It is calculated from the following equation at week 52 as follows: GLOBE score = 0.044378 \* age at start of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy + 0.93982 \* LN (TB x ULN) + 0.335648 \* LN (ALP x ULN) - 2.266708 \* ALB x LLN - 0.002581 \* platelet count per 10\^9/L) + 1.216865; where TB x ULN = bilirubin/ULN at the timepoint, ALP x ULN = ALP/ULN at the timepoint, ALB x LLN = ALB/LLN at the timepoint, platelet count per 10\^9/L = platelet count per 10\^9/L at the timepoint. The Lower GLOBE PBC score predicts lower risk and better prognosis.
Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by AST, ALT, GGT, 5'-NT, and fractionated ALP (hepatic) (H1 and H2). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Total and Conjugated Bilirubin at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by total and conjugated bilirubin. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Albumin at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by albumin. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by INR at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by INR. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52Biomarkers of inflammation were assessed as measured by hsCRP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Fibrinogen and Haptoglobin at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52Biomarkers of inflammation were assessed as measured by fibrinogen and haptoglobin. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52Biomarkers of inflammation were assessed as measured by TNF-alpha. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Immune Response as Measured by Immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52Immune response was assessed as measured by IgG and IgM. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52Biomarkers and non-invasive measures of hepatic fibrosis were assessed as measured by ELF: hyaluronic acid \[HA\], type 2 procollagen peptide \[PIINP\], tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1\[TIMP-1\]) and PAI-1. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52Biomarkers and non-invasive measures of hepatic fibrosis were assessed as measured by CK-18 (M30 and M65). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-beta) at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52Biomarkers and non-invasive measures of hepatic fibrosis were assessed as measured by TGF-beta. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Liver Stiffness Measured by Transient Elastography (TE) at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52FibroScan® TE device (Echosens, Paris, France) is a non-invasive technique used to measure liver stiffness, which correlated with fibrosis. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol and triglycerides (TG). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of FPG. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment bile acids and biomarkers of bile acid synthesis. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured by 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of bile acids and biomarkers of bile acid synthesis as measured by C4. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured Fibroblast Growth Factor 19 at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment bile acids and biomarkers of bile acid synthesis as measured by Fibroblast Growth Factor 19. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and at Week 24 and Week 52The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered PRO questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Response to PBC Worst Itch NRS was according to clinically meaningful change at least 30% reduction; one point, two points or three points decrease in score from baseline in participants with a baseline NRS score ≥4. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake).
Percentage of Participants With no Worsening of Pruritus as Measured by the PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and at Week 24 and Week 54The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered PRO questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake). A worsening of Pruritus was defined by a positive change from baseline in PBC Worst Itch NRS score greater than 2 at week 24 and 52.
Change From Baseline in 5-D Itch at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52The 5-D Itch scale is a questionnaire that has been validated in several different diseases. It assesses symptoms in terms of 5 domains: duration: score range 1 (less than 6 hours) to 5 (all day); degree: score range 1 (not present) to 5 (unbearable); duration: score range 1 (less than 6 hours) and 5 (all day); direction: score range 1(completely resolved) and 5 (getting worse); disability: score range 1 (never affects or not applicable) and 5 (delays falling asleep and frequently wakes up at night or always affects this activity) and distribution: where the question was to mark where itching is present in body parts over the last two weeks. Participants rated their symptoms over preceding 2-week period on a 1 to 5 scale, with 5 being the most affected. The 5-D Itch total score ranged between 5 (no pruritus) and 25 (most severe pruritus). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline= last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 7a at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52The PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a consists of seven items that measure both the experience of fatigue and the interference of fatigue on daily activities over the past week. Participants completed the PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a and answered following questions on a scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always) : "How often did you feel tired"; "How often did you experience extreme exhaustion"; "How often did you run out of energy"; "How often did your fatigue limit you at work"; "How often were you too tired to think clearly"; "How often were you too tired to take a bath or shower" and 'How often did you have enough energy to exercise strenuously". T-score values include mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. The PROMIS Fatigue T-score ranged from 29.4 (best) to 83.2 (worst). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52The ESS is a short, self-administered questionnaire that consists of 8 questions asking to rate how likely it is to fall asleep in everyday situations (each question can be scored from 0 to 3 points; '0' indicates no chance of dozing and '3' indicates high chance of dozing). It provides a total score which has been shown to relate to the participant's level of daytime sleepiness (total score range 0 \[no sleepiness\] to 24 points \[significant sleepiness\]). The total score is the sum of all item scores and ranged from 0 (best) to 24 (worst). Higher scores indicated more chances of sleepiness. Participants were asked to complete the ESS with regard to the level of sleepiness they experienced over approximately the past 7 days. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52PBC-40 assess symptoms across 6 domains:symptoms,itch,fatigue,cognitive,emotional and social. Participants responded on verbal response scale,depending on section options range from 'never'/'not at all'/'strongly disagree' to 'always'/'very much'/'strongly agree'.5 items (3/3 in itch domain and 2/10 in social domain)also included a 'does not apply' option.Domains:Symptoms(7 questions)score range 7-35,Itch(3 questions)score range 3-15,Fatigue(11 questions)score range 11-55,Cognitive(6 questions)score range 6-30,Emotional(3 questions)score range 3-15,Social(10 questions)score range 10-50.Score for each domain was provided(total score was not calculated),with each verbal response scale correlating to score of 1-5 per item(0-5 on items with a 'does not apply' option);5=most affected.Individual item scores are summed to give total domain score.Higher scores=worse outcomes.PBC-40 had 4-week recall period.Baseline=last non-missing value on or before first dose of randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Health Utility as Measured by the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52The EQ-5D-5L is a 6-item, standardized questionnaire that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression, and overall health state. The visual analog scale (VAS) of EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is numbered from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicated better outcomes. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scanning at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52DEXA scanning (hip and lumbar) was performed in participants to assess bone mineral density (femoral neck, lumbar and total hip). T-scores were calculated based on actual measured bone density value. The T-score compared a participant's bone density against that of a healthy 30-year-old adult. T-scores were used to determine primary osteoporosis, which exists on its own without any other cause and were divided into 3 categories: low risk, medium risk, and high risk (osteoporosis). T-scores measure the number of minerals in a participant's bone. A participant's level of bone loss was compared to that of a typical, healthy 30-year-old adult. A score ≥-1.0 indicates low risk, medium risk is a score between-2.5 and -1.0, and a high risk/osteoporosis is a score ≤-2.5. A positive change in T-score indicates an improvement in bone mineral density. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Carboxy Terminal Crosslinked Telopeptides of Type 1 Collagen [CTX] at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of serum markers of bone turnover, CTX. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Change From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Type 1 Procollagen Peptide [P1NP]) at Week 52Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of serum markers of bone turnover, P1NP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical OutcomesFrom Day 1 up to Week 52Onset of clinical outcomes were described as a composite endpoint composed of the following: model for end stage liver disease sodium (MELD-Na) \>14 for participants with baseline MELD-Na \<12; liver transplant; uncontrolled ascites requiring treatment; hospitalization for new onset or recurrence of any including, variceal bleed, hepatic encephalopathy defined as West-Haven score of 2 or more and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; and death.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TEAEs were collected from the start of study treatment administration (Day 1) up to DCO date of 01 June 2023, approximately 980 days.An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant who was administered an investigational product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. A TEAE was defined as any AE with onset during TEAE assessment period, or any event started prior to first dose of treatment and worsened or became serious during the TEAE assessment period. An SAE was any AE that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital abnormality/birth defect. An AESI was an AE that might not be serious but was of special importance to a particular treatment or class.
Plasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007Week 4: pre-dose, 0.5 hour, 1.5 hours, between 2-3 hours, 4 hours and 6 hours post-doseBlood samples were collected at specified timepoints to evaluate plasma concentration of Elafibranor and its metabolite GFT1007.

Countries

Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Italy, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORIpsen Medical Director

Ipsen

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This Phase III, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled study followed by an open-label long-term extension (LTE) was conducted in participants with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) at 82 sites in 14 countries (Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Italy, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, and United States). First participant was recruited on 24 September 2020 and data cut-off (DCO) date was 01 June 2023.

Pre-assignment details

This study consisted of a 2- to 12-week screening period, a 52- to 104-week DB period consisting of a 52-week common DB period followed by a variable DB period of up to 52 weeks in duration; a 4- to 5-year LTE period; and a 4-week safety follow-up period after the last dose of study treatment. A total of 161 participants were randomized in 2:1 ratio to receive once daily elafibranor or placebo. Results are presented up to DCO of 01 June 2023.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Elafibranor 80 mg
Participants received elafibranor 80 mg orally once daily before breakfast during the DB period (maximum observed exposure= 104 weeks).
108
Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to elafibranor orally once daily before breakfast during the DB period (maximum observed exposure= 106 weeks).
53
Total161

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicElafibranor 80 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous57.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
56.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
57.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
101 Participants46 Participants147 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
102 Participants52 Participants154 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants1 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 1080 / 53
other
Total, other adverse events
103 / 10847 / 53
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 1087 / 53

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on Cholestasis Response at Week 52

Cholestasis response was defined as alkaline phosphatase (ALP) \< 1.67 x upper limit of normal (ULN) and total bilirubin (TB) \<= ULN and ALP decrease from baseline \>= 15% at Week 52 and based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced intercurrent events (ICEs) (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.

Time frame: At Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on Cholestasis Response at Week 5250.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on Cholestasis Response at Week 523.8 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [7.641, 302.247]Exact Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured by 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of bile acids and biomarkers of bile acid synthesis as measured by C4. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline at Week 52 in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured by 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) at Week 52-7.288 mcg/LStandard Deviation 16.779
PlaceboChange From Baseline at Week 52 in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured by 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) at Week 52-4.044 mcg/LStandard Deviation 12.995
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 5-D Itch at Week 52

The 5-D Itch scale is a questionnaire that has been validated in several different diseases. It assesses symptoms in terms of 5 domains: duration: score range 1 (less than 6 hours) to 5 (all day); degree: score range 1 (not present) to 5 (unbearable); duration: score range 1 (less than 6 hours) and 5 (all day); direction: score range 1(completely resolved) and 5 (getting worse); disability: score range 1 (never affects or not applicable) and 5 (delays falling asleep and frequently wakes up at night or always affects this activity) and distribution: where the question was to mark where itching is present in body parts over the last two weeks. Participants rated their symptoms over preceding 2-week period on a 1 to 5 scale, with 5 being the most affected. The 5-D Itch total score ranged between 5 (no pruritus) and 25 (most severe pruritus). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline= last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in 5-D Itch at Week 52-1.9 Scores on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 5-D Itch at Week 52-0.6 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of ALP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52Week 13-131.8 Units per Liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 74.6
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52Week 39-134.7 Units per Liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 89.8
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52Week 26-126.2 Units per Liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 85.5
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52Week 52-117.7 Units per Liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 96.5
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52Week 4-116.4 Units per Liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 63.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52Week 52-8.8 Units per Liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 91.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52Week 4-14.3 Units per Liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 92.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52Week 13-19.1 Units per Liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 78.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52Week 26-6.0 Units per Liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 75.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52Week 39-20.0 Units per Liter (U/L)Standard Deviation 90.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured Fibroblast Growth Factor 19 at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment bile acids and biomarkers of bile acid synthesis as measured by Fibroblast Growth Factor 19. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured Fibroblast Growth Factor 19 at Week 52-12.89 pg/mLStandard Deviation 80.24
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured Fibroblast Growth Factor 19 at Week 5254.54 pg/mLStandard Deviation 343.47
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment bile acids and biomarkers of bile acid synthesis. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 for each parameter are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Lithocholic acid-0.010 µmol/LStandard Deviation 0.047
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Chenodeoxycholic acid0.177 µmol/LStandard Deviation 0.807
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Cholic acid0.156 µmol/LStandard Deviation 0.656
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Deoxycholic acid-0.027 µmol/LStandard Deviation 0.288
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Glycochenodeoxycholic acid-0.564 µmol/LStandard Deviation 3.31
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Glycocholic acid-0.370 µmol/LStandard Deviation 2.422
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Glycodeoxycholic acid-0.516 µmol/LStandard Deviation 1.247
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Glycolithocholic acid-0.0234 µmol/LStandard Deviation 0.0762
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Taurochenodeoxycholic acid-0.085 µmol/LStandard Deviation 2.495
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Taurocholic acid0.070 µmol/LStandard Deviation 2.059
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Taurodeoxycholic acid-0.0828 µmol/LStandard Deviation 0.4412
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Taurolithocholic acid-0.0098 µmol/LStandard Deviation 0.0424
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Taurodeoxycholic acid-0.0343 µmol/LStandard Deviation 0.3683
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Glycolithocholic acid-0.0187 µmol/LStandard Deviation 0.1768
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Glycodeoxycholic acid-0.266 µmol/LStandard Deviation 2.688
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Chenodeoxycholic acid0.100 µmol/LStandard Deviation 0.527
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Taurocholic acid1.127 µmol/LStandard Deviation 4.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Cholic acid0.027 µmol/LStandard Deviation 0.337
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Lithocholic acid-0.003 µmol/LStandard Deviation 0.047
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Deoxycholic acid-0.039 µmol/LStandard Deviation 0.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Taurolithocholic acid-0.0082 µmol/LStandard Deviation 0.0684
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Glycochenodeoxycholic acid0.581 µmol/LStandard Deviation 4.408
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Taurochenodeoxycholic acid0.857 µmol/LStandard Deviation 3.048
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52Glycocholic acid2.253 µmol/LStandard Deviation 12.291
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) at Week 52

Biomarkers and non-invasive measures of hepatic fibrosis were assessed as measured by CK-18 (M30 and M65). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 for each parameter are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) at Week 52CK-18 M30-70.71 Picomoles per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 444.31
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) at Week 52CK-18 M65-50.02 Picomoles per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 246.28
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) at Week 52CK-18 M30-5.39 Picomoles per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 334.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) at Week 52CK-18 M65-83.73 Picomoles per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 481.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52

Biomarkers and non-invasive measures of hepatic fibrosis were assessed as measured by ELF: hyaluronic acid \[HA\], type 2 procollagen peptide \[PIINP\], tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1\[TIMP-1\]) and PAI-1. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 for each parameter are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52HA7.93 Micrograms per liter (mcg/L)Standard Deviation 80.35
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52PIINP-2.79 Micrograms per liter (mcg/L)Standard Deviation 32.55
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52TIMP-1-3.03 Micrograms per liter (mcg/L)Standard Deviation 51.06
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52PAI-10.053 Micrograms per liter (mcg/L)Standard Deviation 3.032
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52PAI-10.785 Micrograms per liter (mcg/L)Standard Deviation 7.028
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52HA16.36 Micrograms per liter (mcg/L)Standard Deviation 48.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52TIMP-123.26 Micrograms per liter (mcg/L)Standard Deviation 65.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52PIINP-5.60 Micrograms per liter (mcg/L)Standard Deviation 20.03
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-beta) at Week 52

Biomarkers and non-invasive measures of hepatic fibrosis were assessed as measured by TGF-beta. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-beta) at Week 52713.074 pg/mLStandard Deviation 6553.956
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-beta) at Week 52-6172.360 pg/mLStandard Deviation 3279.127
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Fibrinogen and Haptoglobin at Week 52

Biomarkers of inflammation were assessed as measured by fibrinogen and haptoglobin. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 for each parameter are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Fibrinogen and Haptoglobin at Week 52Fibrinogen-1.002 g/LStandard Deviation 1.303
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Fibrinogen and Haptoglobin at Week 52Haptoglobin-0.185 g/LStandard Deviation 0.407
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Fibrinogen and Haptoglobin at Week 52Fibrinogen-0.776 g/LStandard Deviation 1.265
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Fibrinogen and Haptoglobin at Week 52Haptoglobin0.023 g/LStandard Deviation 0.302
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 52

Biomarkers of inflammation were assessed as measured by hsCRP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 52-1.38 mg/LStandard Deviation 6.53
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 520.22 mg/LStandard Deviation 2.64
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Week 52

Biomarkers of inflammation were assessed as measured by TNF-alpha. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Week 52-3.346 Picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 15.442
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Week 52-0.224 Picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.921
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at Week 52

The ESS is a short, self-administered questionnaire that consists of 8 questions asking to rate how likely it is to fall asleep in everyday situations (each question can be scored from 0 to 3 points; '0' indicates no chance of dozing and '3' indicates high chance of dozing). It provides a total score which has been shown to relate to the participant's level of daytime sleepiness (total score range 0 \[no sleepiness\] to 24 points \[significant sleepiness\]). The total score is the sum of all item scores and ranged from 0 (best) to 24 (worst). Higher scores indicated more chances of sleepiness. Participants were asked to complete the ESS with regard to the level of sleepiness they experienced over approximately the past 7 days. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at Week 52-0.3 Scores on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at Week 52-0.5 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of FPG. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52-0.267 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.861
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 520.086 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.381
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health Utility as Measured by the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) at Week 52

The EQ-5D-5L is a 6-item, standardized questionnaire that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression, and overall health state. The visual analog scale (VAS) of EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is numbered from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicated better outcomes. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Health Utility as Measured by the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) at Week 522.5 Scores on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Health Utility as Measured by the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) at Week 521.6 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52

Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by AST, ALT, GGT, 5'-NT, and fractionated ALP (hepatic) (H1 and H2). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 for each parameter are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52AST-2.5 U/LStandard Deviation 17.8
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52ALT-9.7 U/LStandard Deviation 22.1
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52GGT-44.0 U/LStandard Deviation 95.6
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 525'-NT-3.63 U/LStandard Deviation 5.4
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52Hepatic ALP H1-107.68 U/LStandard Deviation 77.17
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52Hepatic ALP H2-11.76 U/LStandard Deviation 14.67
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52Hepatic ALP H1-32.20 U/LStandard Deviation 71.42
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52AST-4.3 U/LStandard Deviation 24.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 525'-NT-2.09 U/LStandard Deviation 10.52
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52ALT-6.3 U/LStandard Deviation 26.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52Hepatic ALP H2-5.20 U/LStandard Deviation 54.83
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52GGT-17.3 U/LStandard Deviation 112.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Albumin at Week 52

Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by albumin. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Albumin at Week 521.0 Grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 2.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Albumin at Week 52-1.2 Grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by INR at Week 52

Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by INR. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by INR at Week 520.028 RatioStandard Deviation 0.148
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by INR at Week 520.035 RatioStandard Deviation 0.131
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Total and Conjugated Bilirubin at Week 52

Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by total and conjugated bilirubin. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 for each parameter are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Total and Conjugated Bilirubin at Week 52Total Bilirubin-0.67 Micromoles per liter (μmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.18
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Total and Conjugated Bilirubin at Week 52Conjugated bilirubin-0.09 Micromoles per liter (μmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.98
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Total and Conjugated Bilirubin at Week 52Total Bilirubin0.87 Micromoles per liter (μmol/L)Standard Deviation 4.29
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Total and Conjugated Bilirubin at Week 52Conjugated bilirubin0.61 Micromoles per liter (μmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.41
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Immune Response as Measured by Immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM at Week 52

Immune response was assessed as measured by IgG and IgM. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 for each parameter are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Immune Response as Measured by Immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM at Week 52IgG-0.423 g/LStandard Deviation 1.591
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Immune Response as Measured by Immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM at Week 52IgM-0.606 g/LStandard Deviation 0.907
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Immune Response as Measured by Immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM at Week 52IgG0.298 g/LStandard Deviation 1.159
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Immune Response as Measured by Immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM at Week 52IgM0.017 g/LStandard Deviation 0.762
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol and triglycerides (TG). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 for each parameter are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52LDL cholesterol-0.428 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.73
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52VLDL cholesterol-0.118 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.159
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52HDL cholesterol0.011 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.364
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52TG-0.268 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.37
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52Total cholesterol-0.532 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.91
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52TG0.031 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.343
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52Total cholesterol-0.318 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.144
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52LDL cholesterol-0.274 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.086
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52HDL cholesterol-0.056 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.399
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52VLDL cholesterol0.015 Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.156
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Liver Stiffness Measured by Transient Elastography (TE) at Week 52

FibroScan® TE device (Echosens, Paris, France) is a non-invasive technique used to measure liver stiffness, which correlated with fibrosis. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Liver Stiffness Measured by Transient Elastography (TE) at Week 52-0.16 Kilopascal (kPa)Standard Deviation 3.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Liver Stiffness Measured by Transient Elastography (TE) at Week 520.35 Kilopascal (kPa)Standard Deviation 6.39
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 7a at Week 52

The PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a consists of seven items that measure both the experience of fatigue and the interference of fatigue on daily activities over the past week. Participants completed the PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a and answered following questions on a scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always) : How often did you feel tired; How often did you experience extreme exhaustion; How often did you run out of energy; How often did your fatigue limit you at work; How often were you too tired to think clearly; How often were you too tired to take a bath or shower and 'How often did you have enough energy to exercise strenuously. T-score values include mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. The PROMIS Fatigue T-score ranged from 29.4 (best) to 83.2 (worst). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 7a at Week 52-2.45 T-score
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 7a at Week 52-1.23 T-score
Secondary

Change From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52

PBC-40 assess symptoms across 6 domains:symptoms,itch,fatigue,cognitive,emotional and social. Participants responded on verbal response scale,depending on section options range from 'never'/'not at all'/'strongly disagree' to 'always'/'very much'/'strongly agree'.5 items (3/3 in itch domain and 2/10 in social domain)also included a 'does not apply' option.Domains:Symptoms(7 questions)score range 7-35,Itch(3 questions)score range 3-15,Fatigue(11 questions)score range 11-55,Cognitive(6 questions)score range 6-30,Emotional(3 questions)score range 3-15,Social(10 questions)score range 10-50.Score for each domain was provided(total score was not calculated),with each verbal response scale correlating to score of 1-5 per item(0-5 on items with a 'does not apply' option);5=most affected.Individual item scores are summed to give total domain score.Higher scores=worse outcomes.PBC-40 had 4-week recall period.Baseline=last non-missing value on or before first dose of randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52Symptoms0.2 Scores on a scale
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52Itch-1.4 Scores on a scale
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52Fatigue-1.5 Scores on a scale
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52Cognitive-0.6 Scores on a scale
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52Emotional-0.8 Scores on a scale
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52Social-1.1 Scores on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52Emotional-0.6 Scores on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52Symptoms-0.9 Scores on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52Cognitive-0.7 Scores on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52Itch-0.2 Scores on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52Social-0.4 Scores on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52Fatigue-1.2 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Carboxy Terminal Crosslinked Telopeptides of Type 1 Collagen [CTX] at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of serum markers of bone turnover, CTX. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Carboxy Terminal Crosslinked Telopeptides of Type 1 Collagen [CTX] at Week 5236.5 pg/mLStandard Deviation 212.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Carboxy Terminal Crosslinked Telopeptides of Type 1 Collagen [CTX] at Week 5244.5 pg/mLStandard Deviation 129.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Type 1 Procollagen Peptide [P1NP]) at Week 52

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of serum markers of bone turnover, P1NP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Type 1 Procollagen Peptide [P1NP]) at Week 52-2.79 mcg/LStandard Deviation 32.55
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Type 1 Procollagen Peptide [P1NP]) at Week 52-5.60 mcg/LStandard Deviation 20.03
Secondary

Change From Baseline in T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scanning at Week 52

DEXA scanning (hip and lumbar) was performed in participants to assess bone mineral density (femoral neck, lumbar and total hip). T-scores were calculated based on actual measured bone density value. The T-score compared a participant's bone density against that of a healthy 30-year-old adult. T-scores were used to determine primary osteoporosis, which exists on its own without any other cause and were divided into 3 categories: low risk, medium risk, and high risk (osteoporosis). T-scores measure the number of minerals in a participant's bone. A participant's level of bone loss was compared to that of a typical, healthy 30-year-old adult. A score ≥-1.0 indicates low risk, medium risk is a score between-2.5 and -1.0, and a high risk/osteoporosis is a score ≤-2.5. A positive change in T-score indicates an improvement in bone mineral density. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 for each parameter are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scanning at Week 52Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density T-score-0.016 T-scoreStandard Deviation 0.402
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scanning at Week 52Lumbar Bone Mineral Density T-score-0.006 T-scoreStandard Deviation 0.487
Elafibranor 80 mgChange From Baseline in T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scanning at Week 52Total Hip Bone Mineral Density T-score0.039 T-scoreStandard Deviation 0.529
PlaceboChange From Baseline in T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scanning at Week 52Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density T-score-0.111 T-scoreStandard Deviation 0.533
PlaceboChange From Baseline in T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scanning at Week 52Lumbar Bone Mineral Density T-score-0.022 T-scoreStandard Deviation 0.405
PlaceboChange From Baseline in T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scanning at Week 52Total Hip Bone Mineral Density T-score-0.371 T-scoreStandard Deviation 0.618
Secondary

Global PBC Study Group (GLOBE) Score at Week 52

The GLOBE score was a validated risk assessment tool providing an estimate of transplant-free survival for participants with PBC. It was developed by the Global PBC Study Group using Cox regression model on over 4,000 participants with PBC. It is calculated from the following equation at week 52 as follows: GLOBE score = 0.044378 \* age at start of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy + 0.93982 \* LN (TB x ULN) + 0.335648 \* LN (ALP x ULN) - 2.266708 \* ALB x LLN - 0.002581 \* platelet count per 10\^9/L) + 1.216865; where TB x ULN = bilirubin/ULN at the timepoint, ALP x ULN = ALP/ULN at the timepoint, ALB x LLN = ALB/LLN at the timepoint, platelet count per 10\^9/L = platelet count per 10\^9/L at the timepoint. The Lower GLOBE PBC score predicts lower risk and better prognosis.

Time frame: At Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgGlobal PBC Study Group (GLOBE) Score at Week 52-1.03 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
PlaceboGlobal PBC Study Group (GLOBE) Score at Week 52-0.62 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Secondary

Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch NRS Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 24

The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered PRO questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake).

Time frame: Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and Week 24

Population: The Pruritus ITT population included all participants from the ITT analysis set with baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS score ≥4. Only those participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Elafibranor 80 mgKey Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch NRS Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 24-1.598 Scores on a scale
PlaceboKey Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch NRS Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 24-1.255 Scores on a scale
p-value: 0.552295% CI: [-1.489, 0.803]MMRM
Secondary

Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 52

The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake).

Time frame: Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and Week 52

Population: The Pruritus ITT population included all participants from the ITT analysis set with baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS score ≥4. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Elafibranor 80 mgKey Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 52-1.930 Scores on a scale
PlaceboKey Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 52-1.146 Scores on a scale
p-value: 0.19795% CI: [-1.986, 0.418]mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM)
Secondary

Key Secondary Endpoint: Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on ALP Normalization at Week 52

Response to treatment based on normalization of ALP at Week 52 was defined as percentage of participants with ALP =\<1.0× ULN and based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.

Time frame: At Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80 mgKey Secondary Endpoint: Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on ALP Normalization at Week 5214.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboKey Secondary Endpoint: Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on ALP Normalization at Week 520 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant who was administered an investigational product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. A TEAE was defined as any AE with onset during TEAE assessment period, or any event started prior to first dose of treatment and worsened or became serious during the TEAE assessment period. An SAE was any AE that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital abnormality/birth defect. An AESI was an AE that might not be serious but was of special importance to a particular treatment or class.

Time frame: TEAEs were collected from the start of study treatment administration (Day 1) up to DCO date of 01 June 2023, approximately 980 days.

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were administered at least one dose of DB study drug irrespective of the treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Elafibranor 80 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TEAEs104 Participants
Elafibranor 80 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TESAEs11 Participants
Elafibranor 80 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)AESIs32 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TEAEs48 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)TESAEs7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)AESIs14 Participants
Secondary

PBC 5-, 10- and 15-year Risk Scores Based on United Kingdom (UK)-PBC Score at Week 52

The UK-PBC risk score was defined by the mean percentage risk that a PBC participant treated with UDCA would develop liver failure requiring liver transplantation in 5, 10, and 15 years from diagnosis. It is calculated from the following equation at week 52 as follows: UK-PBC score = 0.0287854\*(alpEPxULN-1.722136304) - 0.0422873\*(\[{altastEP x ULN/10}\^-1\] - 8.675729006) + 1.4199 \* (LN(bilEPxULN /10)+2.709607778) - 1.960303\*(alb x LLN -1.17673001)-0.4161954\*(plt x LLN -1.873564875). The survival S(t) for any given participants was then calculated by S(t) = S0(t) exp(UK-PBC score). Here, alpEP x ULN=ALP /Upper Level Normal ALP at the timepoint, altastEPxULN=(ALT, AST or TA) /upper level normal of the value at the timepoint, bilEP x ULN=bilirubin /upper level normal bilirubin at the timepoint, alb x LLN=alb /alb lower level normal at baseline and plt x LLN=plt/plt lower level normal at baseline. Lower UK-PBC score predicts lower risk and better prognosis.

Time frame: At Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgPBC 5-, 10- and 15-year Risk Scores Based on United Kingdom (UK)-PBC Score at Week 52UK PBC 5-year risk score0.0102 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.0126
Elafibranor 80 mgPBC 5-, 10- and 15-year Risk Scores Based on United Kingdom (UK)-PBC Score at Week 52UK PBC 10-year risk score0.0330 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.0393
Elafibranor 80 mgPBC 5-, 10- and 15-year Risk Scores Based on United Kingdom (UK)-PBC Score at Week 52UK PBC 15-year risk score0.0593 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.067
PlaceboPBC 5-, 10- and 15-year Risk Scores Based on United Kingdom (UK)-PBC Score at Week 52UK PBC 5-year risk score0.0146 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.0264
PlaceboPBC 5-, 10- and 15-year Risk Scores Based on United Kingdom (UK)-PBC Score at Week 52UK PBC 10-year risk score0.0454 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.0731
PlaceboPBC 5-, 10- and 15-year Risk Scores Based on United Kingdom (UK)-PBC Score at Week 52UK PBC 15-year risk score0.0786 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1109
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ALP Response From Baseline at Week 52

ALP response was defined as ALP decrease from baseline \>= 10%; ALP decrease from baseline \>= 20% and ALP decrease from baseline \>= 40% at Week 52 and based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With ALP Response From Baseline at Week 52ALP response >= 10% decrease from baseline75.5 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With ALP Response From Baseline at Week 52ALP response >= 20% decrease from baseline69.8 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With ALP Response From Baseline at Week 52ALP response >= 40% decrease from baseline54.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ALP Response From Baseline at Week 52ALP response >= 10% decrease from baseline22.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ALP Response From Baseline at Week 52ALP response >= 20% decrease from baseline5.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ALP Response From Baseline at Week 52ALP response >= 40% decrease from baseline0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With no Worsening of Pruritus as Measured by the PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52

The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered PRO questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake). A worsening of Pruritus was defined by a positive change from baseline in PBC Worst Itch NRS score greater than 2 at week 24 and 52.

Time frame: Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and at Week 24 and Week 54

Population: The Pruritus ITT population included all participants from the ITT analysis set with baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS score ≥4.. Only those participants with data collected at Week 24 and Week 54 are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With no Worsening of Pruritus as Measured by the PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 2489.2 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With no Worsening of Pruritus as Measured by the PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 5276.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With no Worsening of Pruritus as Measured by the PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 2486.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With no Worsening of Pruritus as Measured by the PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 5282.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Outcomes

Onset of clinical outcomes were described as a composite endpoint composed of the following: model for end stage liver disease sodium (MELD-Na) \>14 for participants with baseline MELD-Na \<12; liver transplant; uncontrolled ascites requiring treatment; hospitalization for new onset or recurrence of any including, variceal bleed, hepatic encephalopathy defined as West-Haven score of 2 or more and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; and death.

Time frame: From Day 1 up to Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical OutcomesLiver transplant0.0 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical OutcomesHospitalization for new onset or recurrence of Hepatic encephalopathy0.0 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical OutcomesUncontrolled ascites requiring treatment0.9 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical OutcomesHospitalization for new onset or recurrence of Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis0.0 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical OutcomesMeld-Na > 14 while baseline Meld-Na < 120.9 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical OutcomesHospitalization for new onset or recurrence of variceal bleed0.0 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical OutcomesDeath0.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical OutcomesLiver transplant0.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical OutcomesMeld-Na > 14 while baseline Meld-Na < 120.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical OutcomesUncontrolled ascites requiring treatment0.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical OutcomesHospitalization for new onset or recurrence of variceal bleed0.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical OutcomesHospitalization for new onset or recurrence of Hepatic encephalopathy0.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical OutcomesHospitalization for new onset or recurrence of Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis0.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical OutcomesDeath0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52

The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered PRO questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Response to PBC Worst Itch NRS was according to clinically meaningful change at least 30% reduction; one point, two points or three points decrease in score from baseline in participants with a baseline NRS score ≥4. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake).

Time frame: Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and at Week 24 and Week 52

Population: The Pruritus ITT population included all participants from the ITT analysis set with baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS score ≥4. Only those participants with data collected at Weeks 24 and 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 24: 30% reduction from baseline43.6 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 52: 30% reduction from baseline55.6 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 24: One-point decrease from baseline53.8 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 52: One-point decrease from baseline61.1 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 24: Two-point decrease from baseline38.5 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 52: Two-point decrease from baseline47.2 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 24: Three-point decrease from baseline28.2 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 52: Three-point decrease from baseline41.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 52: Three-point decrease from baseline33.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 24: 30% reduction from baseline28.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 24: Two-point decrease from baseline28.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 52: 30% reduction from baseline33.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 24: Three-point decrease from baseline19.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 24: One-point decrease from baseline42.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 52: Two-point decrease from baseline33.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52Week 52: One-point decrease from baseline38.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 1.5x ULN, ALP Decrease From Baseline >= 40% and TB =<ULN at Week 52

Response to treatment was according to ALP \< 1.5x ULN, ALP decrease from baseline \>= 40% and TB =\<ULN at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: At Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 1.5x ULN, ALP Decrease From Baseline >= 40% and TB =<ULN at Week 5237.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 1.5x ULN, ALP Decrease From Baseline >= 40% and TB =<ULN at Week 520.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP =< 1.5x ULN, AST =< 1.5x ULN and TB =< 1 mg/dL (Paris II) at Week 52

Response to treatment was according to ALP =\< 1.5x ULN, AST =\< 1.5x ULN and TB =\< 1 mg/dL (Paris II) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.

Time frame: At Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP =< 1.5x ULN, AST =< 1.5x ULN and TB =< 1 mg/dL (Paris II) at Week 5243.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP =< 1.5x ULN, AST =< 1.5x ULN and TB =< 1 mg/dL (Paris II) at Week 525.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP ≤1.67 x ULN and TB ≤1 mg/dL (Momah/ Lindor) at Week 52

Response to treatment was according to ALP ≤1.67 x ULN and TB ≤1 mg/dL (Momah/ Lindor) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.

Time frame: At Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP ≤1.67 x ULN and TB ≤1 mg/dL (Momah/ Lindor) at Week 5251.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP ≤1.67 x ULN and TB ≤1 mg/dL (Momah/ Lindor) at Week 529.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 3x ULN, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) < 2x ULN and TB =< 1 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) (Paris I) at Week 52

Response to treatment was according to ALP \< 3x ULN, AST \< 2x ULN and TB =\< 1 mg/dL (Paris I) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.

Time frame: At Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 3x ULN, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) < 2x ULN and TB =< 1 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) (Paris I) at Week 5268.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 3x ULN, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) < 2x ULN and TB =< 1 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) (Paris I) at Week 5247.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Complete Biochemical Response at Week 52

Response to treatment according to complete biochemical response which was defined as \<= ULN values of ALP, TB, AST, ALT and ALB, and international normalized ratio (INR) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.

Time frame: At Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Complete Biochemical Response at Week 529.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Complete Biochemical Response at Week 520.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Normalization of TB (TB =< ULN) and/or Albumin (ALB >= Lower Limit of Normal [LLN]) (Rotterdam) at Week 52

Response to treatment was according to TB (TB =\< ULN) and/or albumin (ALB \>= LLN) (Rotterdam) at week 52. Participant was considered as responder at Week 52 only if total bilirubin and albumin were normal. The endpoint was analyzed in participants with abnormal total bilirubin (TB \> ULN) or albumin (ALB \< LLN) at baseline. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.

Time frame: At Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Normalization of TB (TB =< ULN) and/or Albumin (ALB >= Lower Limit of Normal [LLN]) (Rotterdam) at Week 52TB (TB =< ULN)25.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Normalization of TB (TB =< ULN) and/or Albumin (ALB >= Lower Limit of Normal [LLN]) (Rotterdam) at Week 52TB (TB =< ULN)50.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to no Worsening of TB at Week 52

Response to treatment was according to no worsening of TB, which was defined as level of TB \<ULN or no increase from baseline of more than 0.1 x ULN at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.

Time frame: At Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to no Worsening of TB at Week 5285.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to no Worsening of TB at Week 5283.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB ≤0.6 x ULN at Week 52

Response to treatment was according to TB ≤0.6 x ULN at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.

Time frame: At Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB ≤0.6 x ULN at Week 5274.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB ≤0.6 x ULN at Week 5277.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB Decrease of 15% Change From Baseline at Week 52

Response to treatment was according to TB decrease of 15% change from baseline at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

Time frame: At Week 52

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants. Only those participants with data collected at Week 52 are reported.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB Decrease of 15% Change From Baseline at Week 5231.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB Decrease of 15% Change From Baseline at Week 5222.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Plasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to evaluate plasma concentration of Elafibranor and its metabolite GFT1007.

Time frame: Week 4: pre-dose, 0.5 hour, 1.5 hours, between 2-3 hours, 4 hours and 6 hours post-dose

Population: Pharmacokinetics Analysis Set included all participants who were administered at least one dose of elafibranor and have at least one post-dose PK sample. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80 mgPlasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007Elafibranor: Week 4: Pre-dose92.7 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.9
Elafibranor 80 mgPlasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007Elafibranor: Week 4: 0.5 hour post-dose408.2 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 104.1
Elafibranor 80 mgPlasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007Elafibranor: Week 4: 1.5 hours post-dose281.7 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 66.1
Elafibranor 80 mgPlasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007Elafibranor: Week 4: between 2-3 hours post-dose182.0 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 67.8
Elafibranor 80 mgPlasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007Elafibranor: Week 4: 4 hours post-dose127.7 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.7
Elafibranor 80 mgPlasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007Elafibranor: Week 4: 6 hours post-dose117.1 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 53.5
Elafibranor 80 mgPlasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007GFT1007: Week 4: Pre-dose77.3 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 85.6
Elafibranor 80 mgPlasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007GFT1007: Week 4: 0.5 hour post-dose894.6 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 150
Elafibranor 80 mgPlasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007GFT1007: Week 4: 1.5 hours post-dose1707.2 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 52.1
Elafibranor 80 mgPlasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007GFT1007: Week 4: between 2-3 hours post-dose1160.8 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 53.9
Elafibranor 80 mgPlasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007GFT1007: Week 4: 4 hours post-dose655.8 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 54.7
Elafibranor 80 mgPlasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007GFT1007: Week 4: 6 hours post-dose375.7 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 65.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 2, 2026