Skip to content

Endovenous RFA Versus Ligation and Striping for Varicose Veins

Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation Versus High Ligation and Striping for Treatment of Varicose Veins: a Prospective Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04526626
Enrollment
300
Registered
2020-08-26
Start date
2020-02-01
Completion date
2022-06-30
Last updated
2020-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Varicose Veins of Lower Limb

Keywords

Radiofrequency ablation, High ligation and striping

Brief summary

Varicose vein is a common chronic disease affecting patient's quality of life. High ligation and stripping of the long saphenous vein is the traditional operation for varicose vein. The radiofrequency ablation (RFA) device used for treatment of varicose vein has been available in China since 2014. There are few studies comparing RFA and stripping in the treatment of varicose vein. This study was to investigate the outcomes of RFA and stripping for varicose vein. Patients with varicose veins will be prospectively allocated to RFA group and stripping group. Ultrasound follow-up will be performed to assess recanalization of long saphenous vein at 1 month, 3, 6 and 12 months. Recurrence of varicose vein and improvement of symptoms will also be evaluated. The primary endpoints are technical success, complications and recurrence of varicose vein. Secondary endpoints are duration of operation, blood loss, recovery time, venous clinical severity score, and medical cost. The treatment outcomes will be compared between the RFA group and stripping group. RFA is comparable to traditional stripping in the treatment of varicose vein, however, it is associated quick recovery, lower incidence of complications and higher medical cost.

Interventions

DEVICERadiofrequency ablation for treatment of lower limb varicose veins (ClosureFast, Medtronic)

Thermal injury to long saphenous vein

Sponsors

The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of long saphenous varicose veins

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindicated to operation due to severe comorbidities

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Technical successup to 24 monthsOcclusion of the long saphenous vein
Complications2 weeks after operationDeep vein thrombosis, skin burn
Recurrence of varicose veinup to 24 monthsRecurrence of varicose vein

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026