Skip to content

REVITALIZE: A Telehealth Intervention for Women With Advanced Ovarian Cancer and PARP Inhibitor-Related Fatigue

REVITALIZE: A Telehealth Intervention for Women With Advanced Ovarian Cancer and PARP Inhibitor-Related Fatigue

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04525183
Enrollment
49
Registered
2020-08-25
Start date
2020-12-02
Completion date
2022-08-09
Last updated
2024-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coping Behavior, Coping Skills, Fatigue, Ovarian Cancer

Keywords

Ovarian Cancer, Fatigue, Coping Behavior, Coping Skills

Brief summary

This study is testing whether a 6 week skills-based telehealth intervention can help ovarian cancer patients experiencing PARP inhibitor-related fatigue reduce the impact of fatigue on their daily life and activities.

Detailed description

This is a two-arm, multicenter pilot randomized controlled trial to compare the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of REVITALIZE, a 6-week Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) telehealth intervention vs. enhanced usual care (EUC) in fatigued patients with ovarian cancer on maintenance PARPi. The intervention is called REVITALIZE, and it is a structured, skills-based intervention for providing support, knowledge, and skills for coping with fatigue. This type of intervention has been used in other studies to treat symptoms such as pain, migraines, or worry. This research is being done to develop this program at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and the University of Pennsylvania's Abramson Cancer Center, and to get patient feedback on the telehealth intervention to improve it for a future study. The study is also making a preliminary determinations as to whether REVITALIZE does improve psychological flexibility and fatigue-related interference and reduces fatigue, psychological distress, and fear of cancer recurrence, while improving overall quality of life (QOL). The study will pre-pilot the REVITALIZE intervention in up to 5 patients at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI). This run-in phase serves to test and refine the newly developed 6-week ACT intervention in a smaller sample size prior to initiating the randomized control trial (RCT) portion of the study. After the ACT intervention has been tested and refined, the study will enroll and randomize 40 fatigued patients with advanced ovarian cancer on maintenance PARPi at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and the Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania. Participants will be randomized to receive either a 6-week ACT intervention or enhanced usual care (educational materials). The study anticipates enrolling approximately 20 patients at each site, and 20 patients will be enrolled to each study arm. The ACT intervention will be delivered by masters' level psychologists at The University of Colorado Boulder. It is expected participants will remain in the study for the duration of the intervention and follow-up assessments, which is approximately 3 months. The Funding Organization for this study is the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the Research Funding Provider is AstraZeneca.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALEnhanced Usual Care (EOC)

Educational materials

BEHAVIORALREVITALIZE ACT Intervention

Six 60-75 minute telehealth sessions approximately once a week for 6-8 weeks

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
National Comprehensive Cancer Network
CollaboratorNETWORK
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women ≥18 years of age who have been diagnosed with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma. * Receiving PARPI inhibitors for ≥ 2 months. * Able to read/speak English. * Have an Eastern Oncology Group (ECOG) performance of 0-2. * Report moderate-severe fatigue in the past week (average score ≥4 on a Fatigue Symptom Inventory scale of 0-10)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with an untreated clinical condition or comorbid illness (e.g. anemia, hypothyroidism) that could explain their fatigue. * Patients with chronic severe fatigue that pre-dates their use of PARPi. * The following special populations will be excluded from this research: * Adults unable to consent * Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers) * Pregnant women * Prisoners

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fatigue InterferenceChange from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeksChanges in fatigue interference were measured using the validated 7-item interference scale of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory scale. Interference items assessed the degree to which fatigue interfered with general levels of activity, ability to bathe and dress, normal work activity, ability to concentrate, relations with others, enjoyment of life, and mood. Fatigue interference was scored on an 11-point scale, ranging from 0 (no interference) to 10 (extreme interference). Interference items were summed to obtain a total perceived interference score, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue interference.
Current FatigueChange from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeksThe Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI), is a 14-item self-report measure designed to assess the severity, frequency, and daily pattern of fatigue as well as its perceived interference with quality of life. Severity is measured on separate 11-point scales (0=not at all fatigued; 10=as fatigued as I could be) that assess most, least, and average fatigue in the past week as well as current fatigue. Frequency is measured as the number of days in the past week (0-7) that respondents felt fatigued as well as the extent of each day on average they felt fatigued (0=none of the day; 10=the entire day). Perceived interference is measured on separate 11-point scales (0=no interference; 10=extreme interference) that assess the degree to which fatigue in the past week was judged to interfere with general level of activity, ability to bathe and dress, normal work activity, ability to concentrate, relations with others, enjoyment of life, and mood. Higher FSI scores are associated with worse outcomes.
Fatigue SeverityChange from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeksThe Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI), is a 14-item self-report measure designed to assess the severity, frequency, and daily pattern of fatigue as well as its perceived interference with quality of life. Severity is measured on separate 11-point scales (0=not at all fatigued; 10=as fatigued as I could be) that assess most, least, and average fatigue in the past week as well as current fatigue. Frequency is measured as the number of days in the past week (0-7) that respondents felt fatigued as well as the extent of each day on average they felt fatigued (0=none of the day; 10=the entire day). Perceived interference is measured on separate 11-point scales (0=no interference; 10=extreme interference) that assess the degree to which fatigue in the past week was judged to interfere with general level of activity, ability to bathe and dress, normal work activity, ability to concentrate, relations with others, enjoyment of life, and mood. Higher FSI scores are associated with worse outcomes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Emotional Distress: Anxiety SymptomsChange from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeksEmotional distress was assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7), which is a reliable and validated self-report measure to assess anxiety symptoms. For the GAD-7, respondents rated how often they have been bothered by 7 anxiety symptoms over the past 2 weeks using the following scale: 0 = Not at all; 1 = Several Days; 2 = Over half the days; and 3 = Nearly every day. Respondents also answer a question to assess the duration of their anxiety symptoms. The scale is scored 0-21, where 0-4 is minimal anxiety, 5-9 is mild anxiety, 10-14 is moderate anxiety, and scores \>15 is severe anxiety. Using a cut-off of 8 the GAD-7 has a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 76% for diagnosis generalized anxiety disorder.
Fear of Cancer RecurrenceChange from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeksFear of cancer recurrence will be measured using the 42-item Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI). This survey has been validated across diverse cancer populations, has strong psychometric qualities, and is the most comprehensive multidimensional scale of FCR available.\[36, 37\] Items are scored on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all or never) to 4 (a great deal or all the time). Higher scores indicate higher FCR. The FCRI is both internally consistent (Cronbach's α=0.75 to 0.91 across subscales) and stable over a two-week interval (ρ = 0.58 to 0.83 across subscales). It also has convergent validity with other standardized measures of FCR (ρ = 0.66 to 0.77) and discriminant validity with QOL amongst a large sample (n = 600) of Canadian cancer patients with varying tumor types.
Participant Quality of LifeChange from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeksParticipants' quality of life (QOL) was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Cancer (FACT-O), which has demonstrated internal consistency, reliability, and validity. This measure is composed of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scale, with an ovarian cancer-specific subscale (OCS) included. The measure is divided into five primary QOL domains: physical well-being (7-items, scored 0-28), social/family well-being (7-items, scored 0-28), emotional well-being (6-items, scored 0-24), functional well-being (7-items, scored 0-28), and additional concerns (OCS subscale, 12-items, scored 0-44). Participants rated each QOL domain item based on the past 7 days as: 0) Not at all; 1) A little bit; 2) Somewhat, 3) Quite a bit, and 4) Very much. Subscales can be analyzed separately or aggregated to produce a total score which is scored 0-152 with higher scores signifying better quality of life.
Emotional Distress: Depressive SymptomsChange from baseline to 4-weeks, 8-weeks, and 12-weeksWe assessed emotional distress with the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), which is a reliable and validated self-report measure to assess depressive symptoms. For the PHQ-8, respondents rated how often they have been bothered by 8 symptoms of depression over the past 2 weeks using the following scale: 0 = Not at all; 1 = Several Days; 2 = Over half the days; and 3 = Nearly every day. The scale is totaled (range 0-24) where total scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent cutpoints for mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression, respectively.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
AdherenceChange from baseline to 12-weeksWe examined the number of participants who required reductions in the dose of their PARP inhibitor during the trial.
Psychological FlexibilityChange from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeksWe will measure changes in psychological flexibility (ACT processes) using the Acceptance and Action Cancer questionnaire, which is a 18-item measure adapted from the widely validated AAQ-II and diabetes-adapted AAQ towards cancer specific items. Numerous adaptations of the AAQ towards specific clinical targets have been shown to produce valid measures that mediate ACT outcomes for the specific population. The scale is scored by totaling the individual items (scale: 18-126). Lower scores reflect more psychological flexibility.
Fatigue Self-EfficacyChange from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeksSelf-efficacy concerning fatigue (i.e. the belief in one's capabilities to execute behaviors) was measured with the 7-item Self-Efficacy Scale (SES28). Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale, and total scores range from 4 to 28. Higher scores indicate a greater sense of control over fatigue.
CatastrophizingChange from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeksWe assessed participants tendency to catastrophize about their fatigue using the Fatigue Catastrophizing Survey (FCS). Patients rate each question on a 5-point scale (1=never true to 5=all of the time) to indicate how often each item is true for them when they've experienced fatigue. The scale is scored by totaling the 10 items (range 10-50, where higher scores mean more severe fatigue catastrophizing). In prior research, more catastrophizing (as indicated by higher scores on the FCS) were associated with significantly greater fatigue.
Experiential AvoidanceChange from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeksExperiential avoidance will be measured using the Brief Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ) which only includes 15-items and covers all dimensions of experiential avoidance, including: behavioral avoidance, distress aversion, procrastination, distraction and suppression, repression and denial, and distress endurance. The scale is scored by totaling individual items (range 15-90), where higher scores reflect more avoidance. This measure is internally consistent and has been broadly associated with psychopathology and quality of life.
Value: ProgressChange from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeksWe will use the 10-item Valuing Questionnaire (VQ) to assess personal values enactment during the past two weeks. Respondents rate on a 6 point scale (0 not at all true to 6 completely true) how often each item was true for them during the past two weeks and evaluate using a two-factor scale; the Progress scale and Obstruction scale. The scale is scored by totaling 5 individual items (scored 0-30), where higher progress scores are associated with positive affect, satisfaction with life, purpose in life and mastery and self-acceptance.
Valuing: ObstructionChange from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeksWe will use the 10-item Valuing Questionnaire (VQ) to assess personal values enactment during the past two weeks. Respondents rate on a 6 point scale (0 not at all true to 6 completely true) how often each item was true for them during the past two weeks and evaluate using a two-factor scale; the Progress scale and Obstruction scale. The VQ Obstruction subscale is scored by totaling the sum of 5 items (scored 0-30) Higher VQ Obstruction scores are associated with more depressive symptoms and negative affect.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)
Participants randomized to EUC will receive educational materials developed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) about fatigue and exercise during cancer treatment.
23
REVITALIZE ACT Intervention
Participants randomized to the REVITALIZE acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) will receive 6 weekly sessions lasting approximately 60-75-minutes over a 6-8 week period, delivered face-to-face using iPads, computers or tablets, and a HIPAA-compliant platform (Zoom for Healthcare). If participants have difficulty connecting to the platform, telephone sessions are permitted.
21
Total44

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyRecurrent disease before starting on study001
Overall StudyStudy non-compliance001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject003

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicREVITALIZE ACT InterventionTotalEnhanced Usual Care (EUC)
Age, Continuous63.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
62.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
61.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
Education
College or higher
16 Participants31 Participants15 Participants
Education
High school or less
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Education
Some college
3 Participants9 Participants6 Participants
Employment
Disabled
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Employment
Full-time/part-time
6 Participants16 Participants10 Participants
Employment
Other
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Employment
Retired
11 Participants22 Participants11 Participants
Employment
Unemployed
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Germline mutation
No
9 Participants22 Participants13 Participants
Germline mutation
Yes
12 Participants22 Participants10 Participants
Ovarian cancer stage
Stage III
12 Participants24 Participants12 Participants
Ovarian cancer stage
Stage I-II
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Ovarian cancer stage
Stage IV
5 Participants12 Participants7 Participants
PARP inhibitor indication
Maintenance after first line
12 Participants20 Participants8 Participants
PARP inhibitor indication
Maintenance for platinum-sensitive recurrence
5 Participants19 Participants14 Participants
PARP inhibitor indication
Other
4 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Asian/non-Hispanic
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Other/non-Hispanic
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
White/non-Hispanic
20 Participants40 Participants20 Participants
Relationship status
Divorced/separated
4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Relationship status
Married/Cohabitating
14 Participants31 Participants17 Participants
Relationship status
Single, never married
1 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Relationship status
Widowed/other
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants44 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Time on PARP inhibitor453.2 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 290.1
390.8 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 299.5
333.9 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 302.9
Time since diagnosis2.2 years2.5 years2.6 years

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 230 / 21
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 230 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 230 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Current Fatigue

The Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI), is a 14-item self-report measure designed to assess the severity, frequency, and daily pattern of fatigue as well as its perceived interference with quality of life. Severity is measured on separate 11-point scales (0=not at all fatigued; 10=as fatigued as I could be) that assess most, least, and average fatigue in the past week as well as current fatigue. Frequency is measured as the number of days in the past week (0-7) that respondents felt fatigued as well as the extent of each day on average they felt fatigued (0=none of the day; 10=the entire day). Perceived interference is measured on separate 11-point scales (0=no interference; 10=extreme interference) that assess the degree to which fatigue in the past week was judged to interfere with general level of activity, ability to bathe and dress, normal work activity, ability to concentrate, relations with others, enjoyment of life, and mood. Higher FSI scores are associated with worse outcomes.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Current FatigueWeek 124.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Current FatigueBaseline4.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Current FatigueWeek 43.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.23
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Current FatigueWeek 84.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionCurrent FatigueWeek 84.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionCurrent FatigueWeek 122.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionCurrent FatigueWeek 44.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.32
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionCurrent FatigueBaseline4.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.57
Primary

Fatigue Interference

Changes in fatigue interference were measured using the validated 7-item interference scale of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory scale. Interference items assessed the degree to which fatigue interfered with general levels of activity, ability to bathe and dress, normal work activity, ability to concentrate, relations with others, enjoyment of life, and mood. Fatigue interference was scored on an 11-point scale, ranging from 0 (no interference) to 10 (extreme interference). Interference items were summed to obtain a total perceived interference score, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue interference.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Fatigue InterferenceBaseline3.76 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 2.04
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Fatigue InterferenceWeek 42.80 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 1.93
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Fatigue InterferenceWeek 82.73 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 2.1
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Fatigue InterferenceWeek 122.96 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 2.06
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionFatigue InterferenceWeek 121.32 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 1.14
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionFatigue InterferenceBaseline3.52 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 1.77
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionFatigue InterferenceWeek 82.43 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 1.34
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionFatigue InterferenceWeek 42.56 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 1.25
Primary

Fatigue Severity

The Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI), is a 14-item self-report measure designed to assess the severity, frequency, and daily pattern of fatigue as well as its perceived interference with quality of life. Severity is measured on separate 11-point scales (0=not at all fatigued; 10=as fatigued as I could be) that assess most, least, and average fatigue in the past week as well as current fatigue. Frequency is measured as the number of days in the past week (0-7) that respondents felt fatigued as well as the extent of each day on average they felt fatigued (0=none of the day; 10=the entire day). Perceived interference is measured on separate 11-point scales (0=no interference; 10=extreme interference) that assess the degree to which fatigue in the past week was judged to interfere with general level of activity, ability to bathe and dress, normal work activity, ability to concentrate, relations with others, enjoyment of life, and mood. Higher FSI scores are associated with worse outcomes.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Fatigue SeverityBaseline5.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.21
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Fatigue SeverityWeek 43.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Fatigue SeverityWeek 84.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.75
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Fatigue SeverityWeek 124.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.81
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionFatigue SeverityWeek 123.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.35
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionFatigue SeverityBaseline5.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionFatigue SeverityWeek 84.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionFatigue SeverityWeek 44.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.43
Secondary

Emotional Distress: Anxiety Symptoms

Emotional distress was assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7), which is a reliable and validated self-report measure to assess anxiety symptoms. For the GAD-7, respondents rated how often they have been bothered by 7 anxiety symptoms over the past 2 weeks using the following scale: 0 = Not at all; 1 = Several Days; 2 = Over half the days; and 3 = Nearly every day. Respondents also answer a question to assess the duration of their anxiety symptoms. The scale is scored 0-21, where 0-4 is minimal anxiety, 5-9 is mild anxiety, 10-14 is moderate anxiety, and scores \>15 is severe anxiety. Using a cut-off of 8 the GAD-7 has a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 76% for diagnosis generalized anxiety disorder.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Emotional Distress: Anxiety SymptomsBaseline5.84 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 4.88
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Emotional Distress: Anxiety SymptomsWeek 45.51 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 4.5
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Emotional Distress: Anxiety SymptomsWeek 86.14 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 5.34
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Emotional Distress: Anxiety SymptomsWeek 125.32 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 4.91
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionEmotional Distress: Anxiety SymptomsWeek 122.83 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 1.76
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionEmotional Distress: Anxiety SymptomsBaseline5.85 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 4.75
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionEmotional Distress: Anxiety SymptomsWeek 83.94 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 3.36
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionEmotional Distress: Anxiety SymptomsWeek 44.12 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 2.71
Secondary

Emotional Distress: Depressive Symptoms

We assessed emotional distress with the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), which is a reliable and validated self-report measure to assess depressive symptoms. For the PHQ-8, respondents rated how often they have been bothered by 8 symptoms of depression over the past 2 weeks using the following scale: 0 = Not at all; 1 = Several Days; 2 = Over half the days; and 3 = Nearly every day. The scale is totaled (range 0-24) where total scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent cutpoints for mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression, respectively.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 4-weeks, 8-weeks, and 12-weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Emotional Distress: Depressive SymptomsBaseline7.14 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 4.05
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Emotional Distress: Depressive Symptoms8 weeks6.13 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 4.24
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Emotional Distress: Depressive Symptoms4 weeks6.17 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 4.66
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Emotional Distress: Depressive Symptoms12 weeks6.13 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 4.24
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionEmotional Distress: Depressive Symptoms12 weeks3.98 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 2.12
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionEmotional Distress: Depressive SymptomsBaseline7.14 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 3.88
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionEmotional Distress: Depressive Symptoms4 weeks4.60 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 2.41
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionEmotional Distress: Depressive Symptoms8 weeks4.27 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 2.02
Secondary

Fear of Cancer Recurrence

Fear of cancer recurrence will be measured using the 42-item Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI). This survey has been validated across diverse cancer populations, has strong psychometric qualities, and is the most comprehensive multidimensional scale of FCR available.\[36, 37\] Items are scored on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all or never) to 4 (a great deal or all the time). Higher scores indicate higher FCR. The FCRI is both internally consistent (Cronbach's α=0.75 to 0.91 across subscales) and stable over a two-week interval (ρ = 0.58 to 0.83 across subscales). It also has convergent validity with other standardized measures of FCR (ρ = 0.66 to 0.77) and discriminant validity with QOL amongst a large sample (n = 600) of Canadian cancer patients with varying tumor types.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Fear of Cancer RecurrenceBaseline88.2 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 27.2
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Fear of Cancer RecurrenceWeek 481.5 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 27.7
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Fear of Cancer RecurrenceWeek 881.0 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 30.4
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Fear of Cancer RecurrenceWeek 1278.6 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 26.1
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionFear of Cancer RecurrenceWeek 1266.9 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 23.1
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionFear of Cancer RecurrenceBaseline83.6 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 20.2
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionFear of Cancer RecurrenceWeek 874.0 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 23
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionFear of Cancer RecurrenceWeek 472.9 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 19.8
Secondary

Participant Quality of Life

Participants' quality of life (QOL) was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Cancer (FACT-O), which has demonstrated internal consistency, reliability, and validity. This measure is composed of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scale, with an ovarian cancer-specific subscale (OCS) included. The measure is divided into five primary QOL domains: physical well-being (7-items, scored 0-28), social/family well-being (7-items, scored 0-28), emotional well-being (6-items, scored 0-24), functional well-being (7-items, scored 0-28), and additional concerns (OCS subscale, 12-items, scored 0-44). Participants rated each QOL domain item based on the past 7 days as: 0) Not at all; 1) A little bit; 2) Somewhat, 3) Quite a bit, and 4) Very much. Subscales can be analyzed separately or aggregated to produce a total score which is scored 0-152 with higher scores signifying better quality of life.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Participant Quality of LifeWeek 464.09 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 14.1
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Participant Quality of LifeBaseline60.39 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 12.7
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Participant Quality of LifeWeek 863.30 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 15.01
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Participant Quality of LifeWeek 1261.63 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 14.6
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionParticipant Quality of LifeWeek 1269.81 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 11.01
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionParticipant Quality of LifeWeek 866.37 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 12.09
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionParticipant Quality of LifeBaseline60.76 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 11.43
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionParticipant Quality of LifeWeek 464.15 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 12.05
Other Pre-specified

Adherence

We examined the number of participants who required reductions in the dose of their PARP inhibitor during the trial.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 12-weeks

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)AdherenceDose reduction4 Participants
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)AdherenceNo dose reduction17 Participants
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionAdherenceDose reduction1 Participants
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionAdherenceNo dose reduction14 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Catastrophizing

We assessed participants tendency to catastrophize about their fatigue using the Fatigue Catastrophizing Survey (FCS). Patients rate each question on a 5-point scale (1=never true to 5=all of the time) to indicate how often each item is true for them when they've experienced fatigue. The scale is scored by totaling the 10 items (range 10-50, where higher scores mean more severe fatigue catastrophizing). In prior research, more catastrophizing (as indicated by higher scores on the FCS) were associated with significantly greater fatigue.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)CatastrophizingBaseline19.07 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 8.86
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)CatastrophizingWeek 417.35 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 5.62
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)CatastrophizingWeek 817.71 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 6.76
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)CatastrophizingWeek 1217.57 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 6.11
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionCatastrophizingWeek 1213.20 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 2.81
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionCatastrophizingBaseline17.58 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 7.13
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionCatastrophizingWeek 815.33 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 4.62
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionCatastrophizingWeek 415.09 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 4.01
Other Pre-specified

Experiential Avoidance

Experiential avoidance will be measured using the Brief Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ) which only includes 15-items and covers all dimensions of experiential avoidance, including: behavioral avoidance, distress aversion, procrastination, distraction and suppression, repression and denial, and distress endurance. The scale is scored by totaling individual items (range 15-90), where higher scores reflect more avoidance. This measure is internally consistent and has been broadly associated with psychopathology and quality of life.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Experiential AvoidanceBaseline40.17 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 9.57
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Experiential Avoidance4 weeks40.26 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 11.43
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Experiential Avoidance8 weeks39.64 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 9.62
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Experiential Avoidance12 weeks41.41 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 11.61
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionExperiential Avoidance12 weeks33.40 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 12.39
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionExperiential AvoidanceBaseline40.90 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 13.43
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionExperiential Avoidance8 weeks36.08 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 12.07
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionExperiential Avoidance4 weeks35.80 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 11.49
Other Pre-specified

Fatigue Self-Efficacy

Self-efficacy concerning fatigue (i.e. the belief in one's capabilities to execute behaviors) was measured with the 7-item Self-Efficacy Scale (SES28). Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale, and total scores range from 4 to 28. Higher scores indicate a greater sense of control over fatigue.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Fatigue Self-EfficacyBaseline19.48 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 3.22
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Fatigue Self-EfficacyWeek 819.74 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 3.26
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Fatigue Self-EfficacyWeek 420.39 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 3.2
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Fatigue Self-EfficacyWeek 1220.09 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 3.5
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionFatigue Self-EfficacyWeek 1222.27 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 2.84
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionFatigue Self-EfficacyBaseline19.90 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 2.19
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionFatigue Self-EfficacyWeek 421.73 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 2.66
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionFatigue Self-EfficacyWeek 821.93 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 3.13
Other Pre-specified

Psychological Flexibility

We will measure changes in psychological flexibility (ACT processes) using the Acceptance and Action Cancer questionnaire, which is a 18-item measure adapted from the widely validated AAQ-II and diabetes-adapted AAQ towards cancer specific items. Numerous adaptations of the AAQ towards specific clinical targets have been shown to produce valid measures that mediate ACT outcomes for the specific population. The scale is scored by totaling the individual items (scale: 18-126). Lower scores reflect more psychological flexibility.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Psychological FlexibilityBaseline51.11 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 18.23
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Psychological Flexibility4 weeks49.25 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 18.11
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Psychological Flexibility8 weeks47.64 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 20.68
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Psychological Flexibility12 weeks49.08 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 18.26
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionPsychological Flexibility12 weeks36.31 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 10.75
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionPsychological FlexibilityBaseline48.26 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 16.06
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionPsychological Flexibility8 weeks43.12 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 16.3
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionPsychological Flexibility4 weeks41.56 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 16.62
Other Pre-specified

Value: Progress

We will use the 10-item Valuing Questionnaire (VQ) to assess personal values enactment during the past two weeks. Respondents rate on a 6 point scale (0 not at all true to 6 completely true) how often each item was true for them during the past two weeks and evaluate using a two-factor scale; the Progress scale and Obstruction scale. The scale is scored by totaling 5 individual items (scored 0-30), where higher progress scores are associated with positive affect, satisfaction with life, purpose in life and mastery and self-acceptance.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Value: ProgressBaseline22.91 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 5.14
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Value: Progress4 weeks20.78 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 7.15
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Value: Progress8 weeks22.67 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 6.26
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Value: Progress12 weeks23.00 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 5.16
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionValue: Progress12 weeks25.27 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 5.15
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionValue: ProgressBaseline23.93 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 4.61
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionValue: Progress8 weeks26.00 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 4
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionValue: Progress4 weeks23.28 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 5.97
Other Pre-specified

Valuing: Obstruction

We will use the 10-item Valuing Questionnaire (VQ) to assess personal values enactment during the past two weeks. Respondents rate on a 6 point scale (0 not at all true to 6 completely true) how often each item was true for them during the past two weeks and evaluate using a two-factor scale; the Progress scale and Obstruction scale. The VQ Obstruction subscale is scored by totaling the sum of 5 items (scored 0-30) Higher VQ Obstruction scores are associated with more depressive symptoms and negative affect.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Valuing: ObstructionBaseline11.72 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 5.03
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Valuing: Obstruction4 weeks11.26 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 5.45
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Valuing: Obstruction8 weeks10.35 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 5.12
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC)Valuing: Obstruction12 weeks12.13 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 5.47
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionValuing: Obstruction12 weeks9.87 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 4.49
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionValuing: ObstructionBaseline11.93 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 4.75
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionValuing: Obstruction8 weeks8.93 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 4.43
REVITALIZE ACT InterventionValuing: Obstruction4 weeks10.47 score on a scale (describing the units)Standard Deviation 4.37

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026