Skip to content

Online Hemodiafiltration vs Conventional Hemodialysis in Acute Kidney Injury

Evaluation of the Impact of Online Hemodiafiltration vs Conventional Hemodialysis in Acute Kidney Injury on Inflammatory and Clinical Outcomes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04525092
Acronym
HDFAKI
Enrollment
45
Registered
2020-08-25
Start date
2021-01-01
Completion date
2024-12-01
Last updated
2025-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Kidney Injury

Keywords

hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, Acute kidney injury, AKI, Renal replacement therapy, Inflammation

Brief summary

Only limited data exist on the benefit of online hemodiafiltration in patient with Acute kidney injury. The objective of this pilot RCT is to assess the feasibility of a large multicentre RCT to determine whether, in patients with AKI requiring acute renal replacement therapy, does exposure to Online Hemodiafiltration reduce the inflammatory status and improve renal recovery compared to conventional intermittent hemodialysis at the ICU.

Detailed description

Despite sparse data on the advantages of hemodiafiltration over conventional hemodialysis for intermittent dialysis, there is limited data comparing these modalities in AKI from various aetiologies in critically ill patients. As RCTs involving renal replacement therapy at the ICU are exceptionally challenging to complete, thus a rigorous RCT based on appropriate sample size and relevant clinical outcomes is crucial. The objective of this pilot RCT is to assess the feasibility of a larger multicentre RCT to determine whether, in patients with AKI requiring acute renal replacement therapy, does exposure to Post-dilution Hemodiafiltration or Pre-dilution Hemodiafiltration reduce the inflammatory status and improve renal recovery compared to conventional intermittent hemodialysis at the ICU. As post-dilution HDF has never been adequately evaluated in an ICU context, comparison between pre-dilution and post-dilution HDF is also required to confirm feasibility. This proof-of-concept pilot trial will focus on three feasibility endpoints. It will be considered successful if the following criteria are achieved : * Protocol adherence: If ≥85% of overall dialysis sessions are administered per-protocol according to the allocated modality * Adherence to follow-up: If it was possible to obtain end-of-study outcomes in ≥90% of participants, and * Participant accrual: If the average monthly enrolment is 4 or more participants per months.

Interventions

The following parameters: maximum Blood flow rate allowed by vascular access, dialyste rate of 500 mL/min and average convective volume of \>44L/session reinjected in pre-dilution mode. The dialysate composition, net ultrafiltration rate and use of anticoagulation will be prescribed according to participant's characteristics.

Using the following parameters: maximum Blood flow rate allowed by vascular access, dialysate rate of 500 mL/min, no convection. The dialysate composition, net ultrafiltration rate and use of anticoagulation will be prescribed according to participant's characteristics.

DEVICEOnline Post-dilution Hemodiafiltration

The following parameters: maximum Blood flow rate allowed by vascular access, dialyste rate of 500 mL/min and average convective volume of \>22L/session reinjected in pre-dilution mode. The dialysate composition and net ultrafiltration rate will be prescribed according to participant's characteristics. Usage of intra-dialysis anticoagulation is mandatory.

Sponsors

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Pilot, Randomised, Open-label, Parallel Groups (co-intervention, 1:1:1) of three interventions: conventional HD, pre-dilution HDF and post-dilution HDF

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Hospitalised in the ICU * Acute kidney injury stage 3 (KDIGO-AKI Criteria) * Requiring RRT for AKI, as judged by the attending clinician (initiation) or conversion from CRRT to intermittent dialysis * Adult of 18 years or more

Exclusion criteria

* Female subjects who are pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant during the study. * Subjects who are participating in another study involving dialysis interventions * Subjects or relatives/next-of-kin unable to provide written informed consent * Creatinine clearance (CrCl) \< 30 mL/min measured by 24-hour urine collection or eGFR or on chronic dialysis at baseline * Subjects on active immunosuppressive therapy (\>10mg of prednisone, biologic therapies, calcineurin inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors or antimetabolites) * Subjects with active contraindication to anticoagulation during dialysis session * Subjects whose RRT is not part of their life goal

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence to follow-up (feasibility)90 daysIf it was possible to obtain end-of-study outcomes in ≥90% of participants
Participant accrual (feasibility)90 daysIf the average monthly enrolment is 4 or more participants per months
Protocol adherence (feasibility)90 daysIf ≥85% of overall dialysis sessions are administered per-protocol according to the allocated modality

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dialysis dependence90 daysDefined as the receipt of dialysis at day 90
Length of hospitalisation stay90 days(days)
Number of patients with hemodynamic instability during dialysis treatment (first week)7 days(using two definitions): * Defined as systolic blood pressure drop \<90 mmHg requiring intervention (one of the following: increase of vasopressor, Ultrafiltration cessation/reduction, termination of the dialysis session or fluid bolus) * Variations in the vasoactive-inotropic score between pre-dialysis and per-dialysis timepoint
Number of dialysis session complicated by Circuit/filter clotting90 days(proportion)
Total number of days on dialysis90 days(in patients with renal recovery)
Mortality30 days(overall mortality)
End-of-study eGFR90 days(mL/min/1.73m2)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
(Exploratory) Inflammatory serum biomarkers modulationDay 0 and Day 7(Percentage of reduction by clearance of the following biomarkers: C-reactive protein, CCL11, CCL26, Fibroblast growth Factor, GM-CSF, ICAM-1, IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-12/IL-23p40, IL-12p70, IL-13, IL-15, IL-16, IL-17A, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL 2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, CXCL8, CXCL10, CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, CCL13, CCL22, Placental growth factor, Serum Amyloid A, CCL17, Tyrosine kinase 2 (Tie)-2, TNF-α, TNF-β, VCAM-1 and VEGF)
(Exploratory) Phenotype of circulation monocytesDay 0 and Day 7Activation phenotype of circulating monocytes, using variation in the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) by flux-cytometry, measured at randomisation (Day0) and after first week of treatment (Day7)
(Exploratory) Phenotype of circulation neutrophilsDay 0 and Day 7Activation phenotype of circulating neutrophils, using variation in the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) by flux-cytometry, measured at randomisation (Day0) and after first week of treatment (Day7)

Countries

Canada, Ireland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026