Skip to content

Study of Biomechanical Parameters of Unloading Braces Used in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis (BIOoSE)

Study of Biomechanical Parameters of Unloading Braces Used in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis (BIOoSE)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04524845
Acronym
BIOoSE
Enrollment
13
Registered
2020-08-24
Start date
2018-02-01
Completion date
2020-03-31
Last updated
2020-08-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

Osteoarthritis is a chronic disease affecting millions of people worldwide, and knee is the second most affected site. Knee osteoarthritis is characterized by knee pain, loss of motion, disability, and muscle weakness, all factors contributing to gait alterations, and impacting greatly the patients quality of life. In the absence of curative treatment, pharmacological and non-pharmacological symptomatic treatments are prescribed to maintain this QoL, and therefore delay surgery to more appropriate window of opportunity later in life. The aim of the study was to investigate the acute effects of three braces, using different unloading strategies, on gait kinematic and kinetic parameters, as well as pain in patients with medial knee ostoeoarthritis.

Interventions

DEVICEUnloading brace

Participants underwent one session of gait analysis. The experimental protocol was divided in four conditions, the control condition without brace (NO), and then three conditions with the different braces tested in a randomized order. For each condition, the participant was fitted with the brace by the same experimenter and equipped with 19/20 retro-reflective markers (without/with brace) on the pelvis and the investigated leg for motion analysis. After a short recording in a fixed standing position (static trial), each participant carried out at least three barefoot walking trials of a few meters long at a self-selected pace. The walking trial was validated if a complete gait cycle occurred on the two 90cm x 90 cm force plates recording the ground reaction forces. After each condition, the participant had to assess knee pain.

DEVICERebel Reliever (RR)

Rebel Reliever (RR) (Thuasne, Levallois Perret, France)

DEVICEAction Reliever

Action Reliever (AR) (Thuasne, Levallois Perret, France)

Sponsors

University Hospital of Saint-Etienne
CollaboratorOTHER
Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité
CollaboratorOTHER
Thuasne
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized, cross-over, open labelled, monocentric, controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* unilateral medial KOA classified II or III on the Kellgren-Lawrence scale * varus misalignment with a joint space of at least two finger breadths * pain level equal or higher than 30 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale * informed written consent

Exclusion criteria

* limited ability to walk * normoaxial knee alignment * intra-articular injection of a local treatment including corticosteroids in the 3 months or hyaluronic acid in the 6 months preceding its inclusion or analgesic or NSAID treatment with a wash-out period equal to 5 half-lives of the drug concerned * undergoing physiotherapy * cognitive disorders or behavioral disorders (opposition, agitation, dementia) * arteriopathy of the lower limbs * skin disorders contraindicating the wearing of rigid orthotics * severe varicosity preventing the regular wearing of unloading brace

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee Adduction MomentDay : 1Main parameter determined from the force platforms: \- Position of the center of gravity By coupling the techniques of kinematic measurement and ground reaction force, we obtain the Moment of Adduction (or KAM) when walking

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adduction/abduction anglesDay: 1Adduction/abduction angles (in particular A1 and A2, corresponding to the two vertical GRF maxima, as well as the adduction angle during standing (A0)), were measured (deg) under each condition.
Impact and propulsive reaction force of the groundDay: 1The impact force and the propulsive reaction force of the ground (N / kg) were measured during walking under each condition. F1 corresponds to the load response peak and F2 to the terminal stance peak during gait,
Perceived painDay: 1The pain is self-assessed by the patient using a visual analogue scale graduated from 0 to 10: the analogue scale is presented to the patients, who will mark the level of pain felt during the works under each of the study conditions.
Walking speedDay: 1The walking distance (km/h) was measured during walking under each condition.
Satisfaction related to the deviceDay: 1A satisfaction survey is filled by the patient in order to assess the positioning of unloading brace, comfort, esthetic and global satisfaction of devices
Step lengthDay: 1The length of the step (m) was measured during walking under each condition.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026