Skip to content

Comparing the Impact of Mindful Interoceptive Mapping and Mindful Breathing on Pain and Opioid Use

Enhancing Pain Management and Preventing Opioid Misuse by Optimizing Mindfulness Based Interventions for Opioid-Treated Chronic Pain Patients: A Comparison of Mindful Interoceptive Mapping and Mindful Breathing

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04523766
Enrollment
149
Registered
2020-08-24
Start date
2021-06-29
Completion date
2023-09-18
Last updated
2024-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Chronic, Opioid Use

Brief summary

This is a single site, two-arm, parallel group randomized clinical trial comparing the effect of two mindfulness-based interventions (Mindful Interoceptive Mapping vs. Mindfulness of the Breath) on opioid-treated chronic pain patients' pleasant/unpleasant sensation reports and opioid use.

Interventions

The Mindful Breathing intervention will be adapted from a validated, brief mindfulness training model. Participants will be instructed to focus on the sensations of the breath (i.e., at the tip of the nose and in the nostrils, abdomen and back) and, if a pain arises in the body, acknowledge it without judgement and return attention to the breath.

BEHAVIORALMindful Interoceptive Mapping

The MIM intervention will be adapted from the core MORE meditation practice. Participants will be instructed to (1) zoom in to deconstruct pain into its constituent affectively-valenced physical sensations and precisely map each sensation's spatial location, (2) zoom out to broaden the field of attention to include previously neglected sensory elements (i.e., spaces within the body that are absent of sensation and pleasant sensations), and (3) savor any pleasant sensations or experiences occurring during the mindfulness practice.

Sponsors

University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* (1) men/women ≥18 years of age, * (2) current chronic low back pain condition determined by physician assessment (e.g., ICD-10 codes M54.5, M54.4, M54.3), * (3) reporting pain ≥3 on 0-10 scale with opioid medication, and * (4) long-term opioid pharmacotherapy (\>3 months of use).

Exclusion criteria

* (1) formal mindfulness training (e.g., MBSR/MBRP), * (2) current cancer diagnosis, * (3) psychosis, suicidality, and moderate/severe substance use disorder in the past year as assessed with the MINI, and * (4) unstable illness, as judged by a physician, that may interfere with treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Immediate Change in Pleasant Sensation RatiosImmediately before and immediately after the final mindfulness training session, approximately 30 minutesThe Multidimensional Assessment of Pleasant and Painful Sensations (MAPPS) is an outline of a human body overlaid by a grid of 786 sensation pixels that was developed using the Qualtrics online survey platform, which can be recreated on any device capable of supporting a web-browser. Mouse clicks allow respondents to identify locations (i.e., grid pixels) on the manikin where they feel both pleasant and unpleasant sensations. Clicking once in any grid pixel turns that location blue, indicating a pleasant sensation. Clicking twice in any grid pixel turns that location red, indicating an unpleasant sensation. A ratio of pleasant to unpleasant sensations is derived from MAPPS.
Longer-Term Change in Pleasant Sensation RatiosAt baseline and posttreatment, approximately 1.5 monthsThe Multidimensional Assessment of Pleasant and Painful Sensations (MAPPS) is an outline of a human body overlaid by a grid of 786 sensation pixels that was developed using the Qualtrics online survey platform, which can be recreated on any device capable of supporting a web-browser. Mouse clicks allow respondents to identify locations (i.e., grid pixels) on the manikin where they feel both pleasant and unpleasant sensations. Clicking once in any grid pixel turns that location blue, indicating a pleasant sensation. Clicking twice in any grid pixel turns that location red, indicating an unpleasant sensation. A ratio of pleasant to unpleasant sensations is derived from MAPPS.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Opioid Medication DesireImmediately before and immediately after the final mindfulness training session, approximately 30 minutesSingle-item Numeric Rating Scale (0-10), with 0 indicating no desire for opioid medication and 10 representing the an intense desire for opioid medication.
Change in Pain IntensityImmediately before and immediately after the final mindfulness training session, approximately 30 minutesSingle-item Numeric Rating Scale (0-10), with 0 indicating no pain and 10 representing the an most intense pain imaginable.
Change in Opioid UseAt baseline and 1-month follow-up, approximately 3 monthsOpioid Use will be assessed with a timeline follow-back procedure.
Change in Pain Functional InterferenceAt pretreatment and 1-month follow-up, approximately 3 monthsPain functional interference will be assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026