Proximal Humeral Fracture
Conditions
Keywords
Proximal Humeral, Fracture, Classifications
Brief summary
Majority of previous classifications based on two-dimensional images to analyze these complicated 3-D fractures. Small or delicate changes in rotation and positioning can result to considerable disagreement in the interpretation of standard radiographs. Therefore, a classification system which had a better reliability and reproducibility for the fractures is warranted and helpful for orthopedic surgeons. Furthermore, CT and 3-D CT construction images with high resolution give a much clearer view of the pattern of proximal humeral fractures. Edelson proposed a new three-dimensional classification for fractures of the proximal humerus. The results concluded that it was a useful in classifying these injuries with reasonable interobserver reliability. It could be hypothesized that patients with proximal humeral fractures would benefit from this 3D classification, but there is a scarcity of application of the classification in large samples. T
Interventions
without intervention
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Whole imaging data ; * Clear record of demographic data; * Three dimensional construction with mimics (with CT of B30); * Patients older than 17 years with displaced PHF occurring less than 3 weeks before allocation and treatment.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with the presence of neurological disease (syringomyelia and); * Open fractures; * Pathological fracture (other than osteoporotic); * Not a resident in the hospital catchment area
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| classification based on Edelson classifications | 2019.01-2022.12 |
Countries
China